Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

First-Order Mathematical Modeling of Brain Swelling in Focal Cerebral Ischemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Translational Stroke Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Edema is an important part of the pathophysiology of stroke. However, it remains unclear how brain swelling may influence the progression and measurement of infarction after cerebral ischemia. Initial studies in a mouse model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion demonstrated that infarction grew from 24 to 72 h after stroke onset. Comparison of 24-h versus 72-h brains suggested that tissue swelling developed in both infarcted and non-infarcted ipsilateral regions. Volumes of infarction differed, depending on the method of calculation: direct, indirect, or normalized. A simple first-order model was constructed dividing total brain into three subsets, comprising normal contralateral tissue, non-infarcted ipsilateral tissue, and infarcted ipsilateral tissue. Each subset was then defined as a ratio of original volumes plus additional swollen volumes. By changing the relative portion of swelling assigned to infarct versus non-infarct, our model demonstrated that direct, indirect, and normalized calculations led to different thresholds for matching absolute infarct volumes. In this proof-of-principle study, we described a mathematical model to simulate the distribution of brain swelling and infarct development over time. Our findings suggest that accurate quantitation of infarct volumes depends on relative distributions of edema that may occur in both infarcted as well as non-infarcted brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. del Zoppo GJ (2009) Inflammation and the neurovascular unit in the setting of focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience 158:972–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA (1999) Pathobiology of ischemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci 22:391–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lo EH, Dalkara T, Moskowitz MA (2003) Mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:399–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vosler PS, Chen J (2009) Potential molecular targets for translational stroke research. Stroke 40:S119–S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardutzky J, Schwab S (2007) Antiedema therapy in ischemic stroke. Stroke 38:3084–3094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoff J, Keep R, Xi G, Hua Y (eds) (2006) Brain Edema XIII

  7. Jin G, Tsuji K, Xing C, Yang YG, Wang X, Lo EH (2009) CD47 gene knockout protects against transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Exp Neurol 217:165–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin TN, Yong YH, Wa G, Khan M, Hsu CY (1993) Effect of brain edema on infarct volume in a focal ischemia model in rats. Stroke 24:117–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swanson RA, Morton MT, Tsao-Wu G, Savalos RA, Davidson C, Sharp FR (1990) A semiautomated method for measuring brain infarct volume. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 10:290–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takano K, Tatlisumak T, Formato JE, Carano RA, Bergmann AG, Pullan LM, Bare TM, Sotak CH, Fisher M (1997) Glycine site antagonist attenuates infarct size in experimental focal ischemia. Postmortem and diffusion mapping studies. Stroke 28:1255–1262; discussion 1263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klatzo I (1987) Pathophysiological aspects of brain edema. Acta Neuropathol 72:236–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimelberg HK (1995) Current concepts of brain edema: review of laboratory investigations. J Neurosurg 83:1051–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simard JM, Kent TA, Chen M, Tarasov KV, Gerzanich V (2007) Brain oedema in focal ischaemia: molecular pathophysiology and theoretical implications. Lancet Neurol 6:258–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manley GT, Binder DK, Papadopoulos MC, Verkman AS (2004) New insights into water transport and edema in the central nervous system from phenotype analysis of aquaporin-4 null mice. Neuroscience 129:983–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Zhang H, Feustel PJ, Kimelberg HK (2008) DCPIB, a specific inhibitor of volume regulated anion channels (VRACs), reduces infarct size in MCAo and the release of glutamate in the ischemic cortical penumbra. Exp Neurol 210:514–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberg GA (2002) Matrix metalloproteinases in neuroinflammation. Glia 39:279–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simard JM, Yurovsky V, Tsymbalyuk N, Melnichenko L, Ivanova S, Gerzanich V (2009) Protective effect of delayed treatment with low-dose glibenclamide in three models of ischemic stroke. Stroke 40:604–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported in part by grants from the NIH and the AHA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eng H. Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jin, G., Sun, P.Z., Singhal, A.B. et al. First-Order Mathematical Modeling of Brain Swelling in Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Transl. Stroke Res. 1, 65–70 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-009-0009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-009-0009-5

Keywords

Navigation