Skip to main content
Log in

Stent implantation for May–Thurner syndrome with acute deep venous thrombosis: acute and long-term results from the ATOMIC (AcTive stenting for May–Thurner Iliac Compression syndrome) registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outcomes of stent implantation in managing May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) are not well understood. To clarify the acute and long-term outcomes of stent implantation in patients with MTS having acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT), we retrospectively investigated consecutive 59 patients from 10 hospitals in Japan who were treated with stents for left iliac vein stenosis with acute DVT. Stents were considered successful if the stent was patent at discharge, which in turn was defined as patient success. The primary endpoint for the study was stent patency, and the secondary endpoint was recurrence of DVT and development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) during follow-up. The patient success was achieved in 56 patients (95%). Clinical follow-up was conducted for 50 patients (89%) for a median duration of 40 months (range 8–165 months). Among them, 44 patients (79%) were followed up using imaging modalities. During this period, stent occlusion was revealed in four patients (9%), and one patient was successfully treated using balloon angioplasty. Primary and secondary patency rates were 84% at 19 months and 93% at 20 months, respectively. Recurrence of DVT was documented in 3 (8%) patients. PTS was evaluated from 36 patients. Three patients (8%) had PTS; however, none of the patients had severe PTS. This multicenter retrospective study of the use of stents for treating patients with MTS having acute DVT demonstrated good acute and long-term outcomes and long-term stent patency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okrent D, Messersmith R, Buckman J. Transcatheter fibrinolytic therapy and angioplasty for left iliofemoral venous thrombosis. JVIR. 1991;2:195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mickley V, Schwagierek R, Rilinger N, Gorich J, Sunder-Plassmann L. Left iliac venous thrombosis caused by venous spur: treatment with thrombectomy and stent implantation. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:492–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Sullivan GJ, Semba CP, Bittner CA, Kee CA, Razavi MK, Sze DY, et al. Endovascular management of iliac vein compression (May–Thurner) syndrome. JVIR. 2000;11:823–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hurst DR, Forauer AR, Bloom JR, Greenfield LJ, Wakefield TW, Williams DM. Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliocaval compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:106–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raju S, Neglen P. High prevalence of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in chronic venous disease: a permissive role in pathogenicity. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:136–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartung O, Benmiloud F, Barthelemy P, Dubuc M, Boufi M, Alimi YS. Late results of surgical venous thrombectomy with iliocaval stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:381–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahnken AH, Thomson K, Haan M, O’Sullivan GJ. CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines on iliocaval stenting. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:889–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P, Rossi L, Marchiori A, Piccioli A, et al. The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Haematologica. 1997;82(4):423–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson M, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials. A consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuda A, Yamada N, Ogihara Y, Tsuji A, Ota S, Ishikura K, et al. Early and long-term outcomes of venous stent implantation for iliac venous stenosis after catheter-directed thrombosis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Circ J. 2014;78:1234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Funatsu A, Nakamura S. Stent implantation for iliac compression syndrome with acute deep venous thrombosis. Jpn Phlebol. 2012;23:283–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, Cynamon J, Labropoulos N, Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology. 1999;211:39–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas BC, Patra S, Nagesh CM, Reddy B, Manjunath CN. Catheter-directed thrombolysis along with mechanical thromboaspiration versus anticoagulation alone in the management of lower limb deep venous thrombosis—a comparative study. Int J Angiol. 2014;23:247–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizuno A, Anzai H, Utsunomiya M, Yajima J, Ohta H, Ando H, et al Real clinical practice of catheter therapy for deep venous thrombosis: periprocedural and 6-months outcomes from the EDO registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015;30:251–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberg I, Kaufman J, Jaff MR. Inferior vena cava filters. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2013;6:539–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bashir R, Zack CJ, Zhao H, Comerota AJ, Bove AA. Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1494–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Julian JA, Kahn SR, Jaff MR, Cohen DJ, et al. for the ATTRACT Trial Investigators. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2240–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Haig Y, Enden T, Grøtta O, Kløw NE, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, et al. on hebalf of the CaVenT Study Group. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3:64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Funatsu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards and ethics committee of each participating hospital, and posted for eligible patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Funatsu, A., Anzai, H., Komiyama, K. et al. Stent implantation for May–Thurner syndrome with acute deep venous thrombosis: acute and long-term results from the ATOMIC (AcTive stenting for May–Thurner Iliac Compression syndrome) registry. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 34, 131–138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0532-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0532-y

Keywords

Navigation