Notes
A survey of European/US users, conducted by the London Business School in 1992, showed that confidentiality was listed as the most important benefit in international commercial arbitration. Bagner 2001.
Kerr 1985.
For more information concerning arbitration centers in Asia, see Greenberg 2010.
Lewis 2011.
For example, Hong Kong was not known as a center for arbitrations until recent years after a long-time enormous effort. In 1978–1980, only nearly fourteen arbitrations per year were conducted here. See Williams 1982.
References
Bagner H (2001) Confidentiality: a fundamental principle in international commercial arbitration? J Int Arbitr 18(2):243
Greenberg S (2010) International commercial arbitration: an Asia-Pacific perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 505–511
Kerr M (1985) Arbitration and the courts: the UNCITRAL model law. Int Comp Law Quart 34(1):1
Lewis B (2011) Racing tigers: Hong Kong steps up the battle with Singapore to claim Asia’s arbitration crown. Legal Week, London
Williams A (1982) Law reform: Hong Kong arbitration. Int Bus Law 10:317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y. Macau: an ideal location for international commercial arbitration?. China-EU Law J 4, 243–245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-015-0057-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-015-0057-0