Abstract
In recent years, prostate cancer (PCa) has seen an increasing prevalence, particularly among middle-aged and older men, positioning it as a significant health concern. Current PCa screening predominantly utilizes prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, digital rectal examination (DRE), and the Gleason scoring system. However, these diagnostic methods can sometimes be imprecise. Research has identified that specific microRNAs (miRNAs) exhibit altered expression levels in PCa patients, suggesting their potential as biomarkers for both diagnosis and prognosis. Furthermore, advancements in integrating miRNAs with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) have shown promising results in PCa treatment, potentially serving as micro-markers for TCM syndrome differentiation and treatment effectiveness. Recent developments in anti-cancer therapies that target miRNAs have also been implemented in clinical settings, laying the groundwork for personalized and precise treatment strategies for PCa. This review aims to summarize the expression patterns of miRNAs in PCa patients and explore their roles in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) poses a serious challenge to men's health, characterized by malignant growth within the prostate. This disease ranks second in the global incidence of cancer in men [1]. Notably, in recent years, the incidence of PCa has gradually increased in China, with a higher prevalence observed in urban areas compared to rural regions. This demographic shift highlights the evolving trends in PCa epidemiology and emphasizes the importance of targeted screening measures to effectively meet the needs of different populations. Of concern is the higher risk faced by individuals aged 65 years and older, who often have advanced PCa at the time of diagnosis [2, 3]. This demographic vulnerability highlights the urgent need for proactive screening efforts, particularly for older men, to promote early detection and timely intervention to improve treatment outcomes and reduce mortality. Despite the availability of multiple diagnostic methods such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, clinical staging, and Gleason scoring, accurately predicting disease progression and guiding clinical treatment remain a major challenge. Although PSA level is a widely used biomarker in PCa testing, the traditional threshold of 4 ng/ml has limitations in sensitivity and may lead to missed diagnoses [4]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more nuanced and comprehensive methods for PCa diagnosis and risk stratification. Innovative technologies such as genomic analysis and liquid biopsy are expected to improve the accuracy and reliability of PCa diagnosis. By analyzing genetic alterations and circulating tumor biomarkers, these cutting-edge approaches can provide valuable insights into tumor biology and disease progression, paving the way for more personalized therapeutic strategies based on individual patient needs.
The biological significance of miRNAs in tumorigenesis has garnered considerable attention in recent years. A burgeoning body of evidence underscores the involvement of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of various malignant tumors, including PCa [5,6,7,8]. Consequently, miRNAs play a pivotal role in facilitating the diagnosis, precision treatment, and prognosis management of these diseases. In response to the intricate molecular landscape of PCa, our research team developed the Qilan Formulation (patent No.: ZL 201310492315.8), grounded in the understanding of PCa pathogenesis characterized by the “imbalance of qi and blood, and complex coexistence of cold and heat.” We have substantiated that the Qilan Formulation exhibits notable efficacy in both the prevention and treatment of PCa. This compound formulation, derived from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), exerts its therapeutic effects through the modulation of multiple targets, thereby achieving comprehensive regulatory effects. Building upon the recognized role of miRNAs in PCa progression, we hypothesized that TCM may influence PCa proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and apoptosis by modulating the miRNA-mediated signaling pathway. Accordingly, this article provides a concise overview of miRNA expression patterns and their applications in PCa diagnosis and TCM treatment. By synthesizing existing literature, our aim is to furnish valuable literature support for ongoing research endeavors in this domain.
2 Overview of miRNAs
MicroRNAs are short, single-stranded, noncoding RNA molecules typically comprised of 20–24 nucleotides. These molecules are encoded by endogenous genes and are ubiquitously present in eukaryotic organisms. The biogenesis of miRNAs begins with the transcription of miRNA genes into primary RNA (Pri-RNA) in the nucleus by RNA polymerase II. Subsequently, these Pri-RNAs are cleaved into precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), which adopt a hairpin-like structure, by the Nuclear RNase III Drosha. The pre-miRNAs are then transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by the export protein exportin-5 [9]. Once in the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNAs undergo further processing by the ribonuclease Dicer, resulting in the formation of a miRNA duplex. Among these duplexes, a mature single-stranded miRNA is selectively incorporated into Argonaute (AGO) proteins within the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). This interaction culminates in the assembly of a functional miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC), which serves to modulate sequence-specific target genes [10]. This intricate regulatory mechanism underscores the pivotal role of miRNAs in post-transcriptional gene regulation and cellular homeostasis.
The mechanism of action of miRNAs exhibits notable divergence between plants and animals [11]. In plants, miRNAs typically engage in base-pairing interactions with messenger RNAs (mRNAs) that display perfect or near-perfect complementarity. This interaction facilitates the cleavage and subsequent degradation of target mRNAs through a mechanism known as RNA interference (RNAi). In mammals, most miRNAs do not exhibit complete complementarity to their mRNA targets. Instead, they predominantly exert their regulatory effects by repressing translation and inducing mRNA degradation. However, the precise mechanism underlying miRNA-mediated translational repression remains a subject of debate and controversy [12, 13]. miRNAs primarily recognize specific binding sites within the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of their target mRNAs. They can also interact with the 5′-UTR, and intriguingly, may even upregulate translation under certain growth inhibitory conditions [14,15,16]. Due to the diverse rules governing the interaction between miRNAs and their target mRNAs, individual miRNAs have the capacity to regulate multiple target genes [17, 18]. Conversely, distinct miRNAs may also converge on regulating a specific gene, adding another layer of complexity to miRNA-mediated gene regulation [11]. This intricate network of miRNA-target interactions underscores the multifaceted role of miRNAs in modulating gene expression and cellular processes in both plants and animals (Fig. 1).
2.1 The expression of miRNAs in PCa
The expression of miRNAs in prostate PCa plays a crucial role in mediating sequence-specific target genes, thereby influencing the disease's biological processes [19]. It is postulated that the oncogenic or tumor-suppressive effects of miRNAs in cancer are contingent upon their target genes. In PCa, numerous miRNAs exhibit dysregulated expression patterns and are categorized as either tumor suppressor miRNAs or oncogenic miRNAs based on their functional characteristics. These dysregulated miRNAs are implicated in various biological processes relevant to PCa, including cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, differentiation, and angiogenesis [20, 21]. The interplay between aberrantly expressed miRNAs and their target genes underscores the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying PCa pathogenesis and progression. Dysregulated miRNAs serve as key regulators of gene expression networks, exerting profound effects on cellular phenotypes and contributing to the complex landscape of PCa biology. Understanding the functional implications of dysregulated miRNAs in PCa holds promise for elucidating novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers, ultimately advancing precision medicine approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
Oncogenes play a pivotal role in the development and progression of tumors by promoting abnormal cell growth and proliferation. Among these oncogenes, those exerting their effects by targeting and inhibiting tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) and genes involved in cellular differentiation and apoptosis are termed oncogenic miRNAs (Table 1). TSGs, also known as antioncogenes, constitute a crucial class of genes in normal cells and are capable of inhibiting cell growth and counteracting potential oncogenic effects. These genes function to negatively regulate cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. Conversely, tumor suppressor miRNAs exert their oncogenic effects by targeting oncogenes (Table 1).
2.2 Application of miRNAs in PCa diagnosis
PSA remains a widely used noninvasive biomarker for detecting PCa. It is a serine protease that primarily exists in two different forms in the human body. After entering the bloodstream, most PSA quickly binds to protease inhibitors, forming complex PSA (cPSA). A smaller portion is inactivated by proteases and remains in a free state, known as free PSA (fPSA). The sum of these two forms is generally used to represent the total serum PSA (tPSA) level. PSA is highly specific to prostate tissue but not specific to cancer. Therefore, men with benign prostate conditions, such as prostatitis or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), often exhibit elevated serum PSA levels as well [47]. A meta-analysis [48] incorporating 11 RCTs with a total of 416,000 participants found that PSA screening in patients with PCa did not demonstrate remarkable benefits and may even lead to overdiagnosis. This overdiagnosis can result in treatment for PCa that leads to adverse events such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Additionally, the false positive result associated with PSA testing often necessitates further procedures like biopsies, which also carry significant risks of complications. Consequently, the accuracy of using PSA levels as a criterion for PCa screening is compromised. Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is increasingly employed for localizing and stratifying prostate lesions, its high cost and inability to detect approximately 10% of major tumors necessitate the possibility of performing a second biopsy [49, 50].
Numerous investigations have underscored the involvement of dysregulated miRNAs in the progression of cancer. For instance, oligonucleotide array-based hybridization and clustering analyses conducted by Porkka et al. revealed differential expression patterns of miRNAs in both prostate hyperplasia and cancerous tissues, with a notable predominance of downregulated miRNAs in cancer samples compared to upregulated ones [51]. This overall downregulation of miRNAs in cancer cells is indicative of the poor differentiation of tumor cells relative to normal cells [52]. Furthermore, Roa et al. conducted RT-PCR tests on a PCa cell line, which demonstrated the overexpression of miR-20, miR-21, miR-99a, miR-141, miR-182, miR-198, and let-7a, juxtaposed with the downregulation of miR-145 and miR-155 [53]. In the study by Avgeris et al., a significant correlation was identified linking reduced expression of miR-145 with various prognostic factors in PCa, including Gleason score (GS), clinical stage, tumor size, PSA level, and follow-up PSA levels. This decrease in miR-145 expression was also strongly associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence and a reduction in disease-free survival among PCa patients. These findings emphasize the potential of miR-145 as a biomarker for assessing disease severity and progression in PCa, suggesting that monitoring its levels could offer valuable insights into patient prognosis and treatment outcomes [54].
Research has been actively pursuing blood-based diagnostics for monitoring PCa progression and recurrence through the differential expression of serum/plasma miRNAs. In an insightful study, the miRNA levels were analyzed in both cancerous and non-malignant tissues, as well as in serum samples from PCa patients before and after prostatectomy, documenting a significant reduction in the levels of miR-16, miR-26a, miR-195, and miR-32 in PCa tissues post-radical prostatectomy. This highlighted the potential of these tumor-associated miRNAs to facilitate noninvasive discrimination of PCa [55]. Further expanding on this area, a study employed a TRAMP model to identify novel circulating miRNAs that could serve as biomarkers for male PCa. Their research revealed that four miRNAs—miR-141, miR-298, miR-346, and miR-375—showed consistent changes in serum that correlated with those in male PCa patients [56]. Additionally, Cheng et al. identified a set of miRNAs (miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, miR-210, and miR-375) associated with metastatic castration-resistant PCa during the screening and validation phases of their study [57]. Based on the analysis of seven miRNAs in plasma samples, Mihelich et al. proposed the miR Risk Score, a scoring system designed to predict low-grade PCa with high accuracy [58].
Moreover, the similarity between miRNAs detected in urine and those expressed in prostate neoplasia has been investigated, suggesting their potential use as markers for PCa screening [59]. Bryzgunova et al. conducted a detailed analysis using a specific miRCURY LNA miRNA qPCR Panel to compare the expression of 84 miRNAs in samples enriched with extracellular vesicles and cell-free urine supernatants from healthy males, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and PCa patients. This study identified five pairs of miRNAs that could be used to detect PCa and assist in therapy optimization [60].
Furthermore, semen has also been explored as a specimen for miRNA testing. Analysis showed elevated levels of pairs of five miRNAs (miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-30a, miR-375, and miR-99a) in patients with increased PSA and biopsy-confirmed cancer, with miR-200b notably showing a notable correlation with the GS, underscoring the potential of semen-based testing for diagnostic screening of PCa [61].
3 Application of miRNAs in the treatment of PCa with TCM
3.1 miRNAs and TCM syndrome differentiation
TCM syndrome differentiation is a method that encapsulates the pathological attributes of a disease at a specific stage of its progression, relying on the Four Diagnostic Methods: observation, auscultation and olfaction, inquiry, and pulse feeling/palpation. These traditional methods enable practitioners to assess the pathogenesis of diseases from a macroscopic perspective, adhering to the principle that internal imbalances are reflected externally. This approach to TCM embodies the dynamic evolution of a disease from cellular (microscopic) disruptions to the external symptoms (macroscopic) observed. In the realm of modern research, miRNAs have emerged as a significant area of study, particularly in how they relate to TCM deficiency syndromes through their roles in immune and metabolic regulation [62]. miRNAs have demonstrated potential as biomarkers for the classification and tracking of the evolutionary trends of TCM syndromes in various diseases. For instance, research has identified distinct miRNA profiles associated with TCM syndromes in conditions such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [63] and aplastic anemia [64]. These findings offer a molecular foundation for understanding the various TCM syndromes present in these diseases. Additionally, disparities in serum miRNA expression levels among patients with different TCM syndromes across various diseases have prompted extensive studies. These studies aim to integrate macroscopic TCM syndrome differentiation with microscopic miRNA indicators, providing a scientific basis for elucidating TCM syndromes and addressing the limitations of traditional macroscopic methods of differentiation [65]. This holistic approach merges ancient diagnostic techniques with contemporary molecular science, enhancing the precision and understanding of TCM practices.
3.2 miRNAs and the physical constitution in TCM
In the context of modern medicine, a tumor is defined as a neoplasm that arises from the abnormal proliferation of local tissue cells due to various carcinogenic factors. TCM, however, interprets tumors through the lens of symptomatology, classifying them as “a lump,” “a mass,” or “a rock-like mass”. According to TCM theory, the pathogenesis of tumors primarily involves a combination of deficiency of Ben (root cause) and excess of Biao (manifested symptoms), such as kidney yang deficiency underpinning the condition, with qi stagnation, sputum retention, blood stasis, and accumulation of dampness manifesting as symptomatic expressions [66]. From the classical TCM text, “Su Wen” (Plain Questions), particularly in the section “Yin Yang Ying Xiang Da Lun” (Great Treatise on the Corresponding Manifestations of Yin and Yang), it is posited that the transformation of yang into qi and yin into material substance underlies the physiological processes. This text suggests that deficiencies in yang qi can lead to the condensation of cold, which is viewed as a fundamental cause of tumor development. This concept is further elaborated with the idea that “evil qi” invades primarily due to a deficiency in healthy qi, indicating that a lack of yang qi facilitates the invasion of cold, leading to fluid accumulation and blood stasis which together may foster the formation of tangible tumors. In a modern scientific context, a previous study explored these traditional concepts through contemporary biomedical research methodologies. Utilizing high-throughput sequencing technology, the study examined the relationship between physical constitution and exosomal miRNAs. It was discovered that 28 miRNAs exhibited altered expressions in a yang-deficient constitution compared to a moderate constitution. These miRNAs are implicated in causing diseases through cytokine signaling pathways among other mechanisms, thereby providing a molecular basis for understanding how traditional concepts of yang deficiency relate to disease pathogenesis, including tumor formation [67].
3.3 miRNAs and the mechanism of action of TCM
TCM possesses unique advantages such as minimal adverse reactions and synergistic effects in enhancing efficacy while reducing toxicity. The application of TCM in the treatment of PCa can mitigate the adverse effects associated with modern medical treatments. TCM also significantly contributes to immune regulation, prolonging survival, and improving the quality of life for patients [68]. The combination of the “syndrome differentiation and treatment” theory with the unique pharmacological advantages of TCM has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of PCa. The role of miRNAs in the development and progression of malignant tumors has become a research focus in recent years. miRNAs are involved in regulating tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion/metastasis mechanisms, with different miRNAs exerting either oncogenic or tumor-suppressive effects in various malignancies [69]. Various studies have confirmed that TCM can exert anti-tumor effects by modulating the expression of PCa-related miRNAs (Table 2).
The distinct active components of single TCM have demonstrated significant potential in the treatment of PCa. For example, curcumin, an active anti-tumor compound derived from Curcumae Longae Rhizoma (turmeric), has been shown to play a significant anti-tumor role by inhibiting the activation of β-catenin/c-Myc proteins and cell proliferation through the upregulation of miR-34a in PCa cells [70]. Curcumin can also curb PCa proliferation and invasion by enhancing the expression of tumor suppressor miR-145, which subsequently inhibits the expression of lncRNA-ROR and Oct4[71]. Curcumin can upregulate the expression of miR-199a-3p, thereby inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer C4-2 cells [72]. Curcumin also inhibits PC3 cell proliferation, promotes apoptosis, and reduces tumor weight in xenograft models of nude mice, with the underlying mechanism possibly involving the downregulation of miR-210 expression, which subsequently suppresses the TLR4 signaling pathway and decreases the expression of inflammatory cytokines [73]. In addition, it can inhibit the development and progression of PCa by targeting the LINC00491/miR-532-3p axis, which suppresses the expression of KI67, MMP-2, and MMP-9, and promotes the expression of Caspase 3 [74]. A recent study [75] indicated that curcumin inhibits PCa by upregulating miR-483-3p and inhibiting UBE2C. Astragalus polysaccharides (APS) is one of the main active components of the TCM Astragalus, and can inhibit the proliferation, invasion, and migration of DU145 cells by upregulating miR-133a [76]. Other findings suggested that APS inhibits tumorigenesis and lipid metabolism in PCa through miR-138-5p/SIRT1/SREBP1 pathways [77].
Moreover, compound preparations from TCM, known for their multi-target and multi-pathway therapeutic actions, hold significant potential in disease treatment. An example is the Guben Sanjie Formula, which includes ingredients such as Hedyotis diffusa, Lobelia chinensis, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Ficus hirta, Fritillaria thunbergii Miq., and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (licorice). This formula has been shown to modulate miRNA expression, specifically downregulating miR-188 and upregulating Caspase-3 & Bax, which are involved in the apoptotic pathway. This modulation leads to decreased expression of Ki-67 and Bcl-2, thereby supporting the treatment of PCa by replenishing qi, strengthening vital qi, promoting blood circulation, and dissipating masses [78]. Yishen Tonglong Decoction can promote apoptosis in prostate cancer PC-3 cells by upregulating the expression of miR-145-5p, which inhibits the TLR4/p38 MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway [79]. Qilan Formulation may inhibit the proliferation of DU145 cells and promote apoptosis by downregulating the expression of miR-1297, increasing PTEN expression, and reducing PI3K/AKT phosphorylation, thereby regulating the expression of cell cycle and apoptosis-related factors (Cyclin D1, Bcl-2, Bax, Cleaved-caspase 3) in downstream pathways [80].
4 Other miRNA-based interventions for PCa
miRNAs possess the ability to bind to multiple targets and regulate various cancer-related gene networks, making them potent tools for developing new therapies aimed at targeting PCa. It was discovered that androgen ablation therapy is highly effective in treating advanced PCa, and miR-133a-5p has been identified as inhibiting the proliferation of androgen receptor (AR)-positive PCa cells by targeting the FUS/AR interaction, which enhances resistance to androgen ablation therapy [81]. Additionally, RNA interference technology has been shown to regulate the post-transcriptional expression of cancer genes and interfere with related protein expression, demonstrating significant anti-cancer effects [82]. However, miRNAs face significant challenges in efficiently penetrating tumor tissues and are prone to rapid degradation and elimination during blood circulation [83, 84]. To overcome these challenges, research into nanoparticle encapsulation of RNA has shown that nanoparticles often face endosomal/lysosomal disruption after cellular internalization. A study introduced a PMPC complex where the outer layer dissolves in low-pH environments, triggering the rapid release of the PMPC polymer from endosomes/lysosomes and enhancing the cytoplasmic delivery of miR146a. This method has proven effective in inhibiting the expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) [85, 86]. Furthermore, radiotherapy, while a standard treatment for PCa, has associated adverse reactions that are a significant clinical concern. A recent study confirmed that a hypothetical treatment involving miR-1272 recombination combined with ionizing radiation could improve the response of PCa to conventional radiotherapy, suggesting a promising direction for enhancing treatment efficacy while mitigating side effects [87].
5 miRNAs and PCa prognosis
While the GS is the premier prognostic indicator in PCa management, several challenges compromise its reliability. These include the fact that only 2% of prostate tumor samples can be obtained by puncture [88], discrepancies between GS in aspiration biopsy and prostatectomy specimens [89], and the variability in the clinical judgment of observers as well as sampling errors [90,91,92]. Furthermore, the stability and specific roles of miRNAs in cancer have generated considerable interest in their potential for PCa prognosis.
It has been observed that nearly 30% of PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) experience clinical recurrence, marked by increased PSA levels [93]. The search for reliable predictors of PCa recurrence is therefore critical. Molecular changes in miRNAs have been linked to the initiation and progression of PCa [94]. A meta-analysis of five studies, comprising six miRNA datasets, indicated that in recurrent PCa samples, miRNAs such as miR-125A, miR-199A-3P, miR-28-5P, miR-301B, miR-324-5B, miR-361-5P, miR-363, miR-449A, miR-484, miR-498, miR-579, miR-637, miR-720, miR-874, and miR-98 were typically upregulated, while miR-639, miR-661, miR-760, miR-890, and miR-939 were usually downregulated, marking them as candidate predictive markers of recurrent PCa after RP [95]. Furthermore, genome-wide miRNA expression profiling of PCa tissue samples from 123 men who received RP showed a correlation between poor prognosis after RP and relatively high expression of miR-10b-5p/miR-23a-3p or relatively low expression of miR-133a/miR-374b-5p. The four-miRNA prognostic ratio model, MiCaP (miR-23a-3p × miR-10b-5p)/(miR-133a × miR-374b-5p), was identified as a prognostic marker for predicting postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR) and prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS) [96].
Additionally, the role of plasma exosomal miRNAs in predicting the prognosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was evaluated in a screening cohort of 23 cases. RNA sequencing was used to identify candidate exosomal miRNAs associated with overall survival (OS), and Cox regression analysis identified miR-1290, miR-1246, and miR-375 as significant. In these populations, higher miR-1290 and miR-375 levels were significantly associated with lower overall survival. Further clinical prognostic assessment in 100 patients using real-time qPCR showed that the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) improved from 0.66 to 0.73, significantly enhancing predictive performance [97].
6 Conclusion and Outlook
Addressing the challenge of performing predictive examinations at the early stages of cancer development and intervening in the treatment process is crucial in modern medicine. Although PSA is commonly used for screening in clinical practice, it lacks sufficient specificity, underscoring the urgent need to identify effective biological markers for clinical application. PCa typically progresses slowly and is not detectable in its early stages by conventional instrumental analytical methods such as X-ray scanning, MRI, and ultrasonography. The clonal and heterogeneous nature of cancer also means its phenotype cannot always be comprehensively characterized by biopsy.
Tumor-derived miRNAs, detectable in the extracellular space (ECS) and various biological fluids, offer a promising avenue for non-invasive cancer diagnostics and phenotyping through liquid biopsies98. Additionally, there has been progress in the application of miRNAs in the treatment of PCa using TCM. Future efforts should focus on further analyzing the gene expression profiles of miRNAs in different types of PCa compared to normal control populations, screening for differential genes associated with each syndrome of PCa, and exploring the nature of each syndrome of PCa and the underlying pathological mechanisms at the genetic level. As research on the mechanism of miRNA action in tumor biology deepens, and with the advancement of high-throughput technologies such as miRNA microarrays, new methods for treating PCa have emerged. In conclusion, miRNAs play a significant role in the occurrence, development, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PCa, and they may become a new target for PCa intervention.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.
Gao R, et al. Clinical features and epidemiological trend of prostate cancer in the Changsha area of Hunan Province: Analysis of 2 877 cases. Natl J Androl. 2020;26(4):309–15.
Jiang G, et al. Morbidity and death trend of prostatic carcinoma, Qiannan, 2009–2018. Modern Preventive Medicine. 2019;46(13):2488–91.
Ankerst DP, Thompson IM. Sensitivity and specificity of prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection with high rates of biopsy verification. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2006;78(4):125–9.
Ceder Y. Non-coding RNAs in prostate cancer: from discovery to clinical applications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;886:155–70.
Urabe F, et al. miRNAs in prostate cancer: Intercellular and extracellular communications. Int J Urol. 2022;29(12):1429–38.
Budakoti M, et al. Micro-RNA: The darkhorse of cancer. Cell Signal. 2021;83:109995.
Yang H, et al. MiRNA-based therapies for lung cancer: opportunities and challenges? Biomolecules. 2023;13(6):877.
Ying SY, et al. The microRNA. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1733:1–25.
Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(9):597–610.
Brodersen P, et al. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science. 2008;320(5880):1185–90.
Rodriguez A, et al. Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res. 2004;14(10a):1902–10.
Simonson B, Das S. MicroRNA therapeutics: the next magic bullet? Mini Rev Med Chem. 2015;15(6):467–74.
Lytle JR, Yario TA, Steitz JA. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5’ UTR as in the 3’ UTR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9667–72.
Moretti F, Thermann R, Hentze MW. Mechanism of translational regulation by miR-2 from sites in the 5’ untranslated region or the open reading frame. RNA. 2010;16(12):2493–502.
Vasudevan S, Tong Y, Steitz JA. Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007;318(5858):1931–4.
Li Y, et al. MicroRNAs regulating signaling pathways: potential biomarkers in systemic sclerosis. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13(4):234–41.
Ning J, et al. Opposing roles and potential antagonistic mechanism between TGF-β and BMP pathways: Implications for cancer progression. EBioMedicine. 2019;41:702–10.
Chen PS, Lin SC, Tsai SJ. Complexity in regulating microRNA biogenesis in cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020;245(5):395–401.
Constâncio V, et al. MiRNA biomarkers in cancers of the male reproductive system: are we approaching clinical application? Andrology. 2023;11(4):651–67.
Arrighetti N, et al. miRNAs as therapeutic tools and biomarkers for prostate cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(3):380.
Xiao L, Jin Y, Tong M. Study on the regulation mechanism of miRNA-21 on its target gene PTEN expression in prostate cancer. Modern Prevent Med. 2013;40(06):1112–5.
Yang Y, Guo JX, Shao ZQ. miR-21 targets and inhibits tumor suppressor gene PTEN to promote prostate cancer cell proliferation and invasion: An experimental study. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10(1):87–91.
Zennami K, et al. PDCD4 is an androgen-repressed tumor suppressor that regulates prostate cancer growth and castration resistance. Mol Cancer Res. 2019;17(2):618–27.
Scaravilli M, et al. miR-32 promotes MYC-driven prostate cancer. Oncogenesis. 2022;11(1):11.
Nie Y, et al. miRNA-191 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of prostate cancer by targeting PLCD1. Chinese J Appl Physiol. 2020;36(6):637–41.
Zhan B, et al. miR-196a-mediated downregulation of p27(kip1) protein promotes prostate cancer proliferation and relates to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate. 2020;80(12):1024–37.
Qu Y, Huang W. Effects of micro RNA-210 on the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(2):1740–4.
Ren D, et al. Oncogenic miR-210-3p promotes prostate cancer cell EMT and bone metastasis via NF-κB signaling pathway. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):117.
Galardi S, et al. miR-221 and miR-222 expression affects the proliferation potential of human prostate carcinoma cell lines by targeting p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(32):23716–24.
Hart M, et al. Comparative microRNA profiling of prostate carcinomas with increasing tumor stage by deep sequencing. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12(2):250–63.
Chen Y, et al. MicroRNA 363 mediated positive regulation of c-myc translation affect prostate cancer development and progress. Neoplasma. 2015;62(2):191–8.
Pickl JM, et al. Ago-RIP-Seq identifies polycomb repressive complex I member CBX7 as a major target of miR-375 in prostate cancer progression. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):59589–603.
Duan XM, et al. MicroRNA-498 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer cells and decreases radiation sensitivity by targeting PTEN. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019;35(11):659–71.
Ye D, et al. miR-522-3p promotes prostate cancer progression though targeting regulate SMAD2. J Qiqihar Univ Med. 2022;43(9):801–6.
Fazio S, et al. The miR-28–5p targetome discovery Identified SREBF2 as one of the mediators of the miR-28–5p tumor suppressor activity in prostate cancer cells. Cells. 2020;9:2.
Mao A, et al. MicroRNA-29b-3p enhances radiosensitivity through modulating WISP1-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. J Cancer. 2020;11(21):6356–64.
Li WJ, et al. MicroRNA-34a, prostate cancer stem cells, and therapeutic development. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:18.
Liao G, et al. MicroRNA-92a inhibits the cell viability and metastasis of prostate cancer by targeting SOX4. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020;19:1533033820959354.
Huang S, et al. Downregulation of miR-141-3p promotes bone metastasis via activating NF-κB signaling in prostate cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):173.
Ren D, et al. Double-negative feedback loop between ZEB2 and miR-145 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell properties in prostate cancer cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;358(3):763–78.
Guo W, et al. HEF1 promotes epithelial mesenchymal transition and bone invasion in prostate cancer under the regulation of microRNA-145. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(7):1606–15.
Saini S, et al. Regulatory role of mir-203 in prostate cancer progression and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(16):5287–98.
Xu G, et al. miRNA-214-5p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation by targeting SOX4. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):338.
Colden M, et al. MicroRNA-466 inhibits tumor growth and bone metastasis in prostate cancer by direct regulation of osteogenic transcription factor RUNX2. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(1): e2572.
Li W, et al. Effects of miR-612 targeting regulation of FOXP1 on proliferation, migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells. J Mudanjiang Med Univ. 2022;43(6):23–7.
Bertoli G, Cava C, Castiglioni I. MicroRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and theranostics in prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(3):421.
Paschen U, et al. Assessment of prostate-specific antigen screening: an evidence-based report by the german institute for quality and efficiency in health care. BJU Int. 2022;129(3):280–9.
Rouvière O, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):100–9.
Hamoen EHJ, et al. Use of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1112–21.
Khan MM, et al. Emerging role of miRNA in prostate cancer: a future era of diagnostic and therapeutics. Gene. 2023;888:147761.
Elazab IM, et al. Prostate cancer and the cell cycle: focusing on the role of microRNAs. Gene. 2024;928:148785.
Roa W, et al. Identification of a new microRNA expression profile as a potential cancer screening tool. Clin Invest Med. 2010;33(2):E124.
Avgeris M, et al. The loss of the tumour-suppressor miR-145 results in the shorter disease-free survival of prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(12):2573–81.
Mahn R, et al. Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) in serum of patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2011;77(5):1265.e9-16.
Selth LA, et al. Discovery of circulating microRNAs associated with human prostate cancer using a mouse model of disease. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(3):652–61.
Cheng HH, et al. Circulating microRNA profiling identifies a subset of metastatic prostate cancer patients with evidence of cancer-associated hypoxia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7): e69239.
Mihelich BL, et al. Elevated serum microRNA levels associate with absence of high-grade prostate cancer in a retrospective cohort. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0124245.
Jeon J, et al. Temporal stability and prognostic biomarker potential of the prostate cancer urine miRNA transcriptome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(3):247–55.
Bryzgunova OE, et al. Data analysis algorithm for the development of extracellular miRNA-based diagnostic systems for prostate cancer. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4): e0215003.
Selth LA, et al. Human seminal fluid as a source of prostate cancer-specific microRNA biomarkers. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21(4):L17-21.
Liu Y. Roles of miRNAs regulation in occurrence of deficiency syndrome in traditional Chinese medicine. Chin Archi Traditional Chin Med. 2019;37(7):1650–2.
Chen G, Wang Y, Ying X. Analysis of microRNA expression profile of serum in patients with non-small cell lung cancer of different chinese medicine syndrome types. J New Chin Med. 2020;52(16):46–50.
Yu Z, et al. Research on the correlation between mir-155 expression and syndrome differentiation in patients with chronic aplastic anemia. Acta Chin Med Pharmacol. 2015;1:65–7.
Liu J, et al. The guiding significance of serum miRNA in traditional chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment Shaanxi. J Traditional Chin Med. 2015;7:891–3.
Wang Y, Xie C. Warming yang should be taken seriously in the treatment of advanced cancer China. J Chin Med. 2015;30(3):319–21.
Wang L, et al. Analysis of exosomal miRNA expression profile in people between yang deficiency constitution and balanced constitution. Global Tradit Chin Med. 2020;13(12):2030–5.
Zhang J, et al. Research and discussion on modern mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of prostate cancer. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med. 2024;42(3):132–7.
Dragomir MP, Knutsen E, Calin GA. Classical and noncanonical functions of miRNAs in cancers. Trends Genet. 2022;38(4):379–94.
Zhu M, et al. Modulation of miR-34a in curcumin-induced antiproliferation of prostate cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(9):15616–24.
Mohiuddin IS, Wei SJ, Kang MH. Role of OCT4 in cancer stem-like cells and chemotherapy resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(4): 165432.
Yuan S, et al. Effects of curcumin mediating miR-199 a-3 p gene on prostate cancer C4–2 cells. Chin J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37(2):124–7.
Ran H, et al. Effect of Curcumin on Apoptosis of PC3 Cell Line via Down-Regulating the Expressions of MiR210 and TLR4/NF-κB Signaling Pathway. Pharmacol Clin Chin Materia Med. 2021;37(1):64–8.
Cheng G, et al. Curcumin inhibits occurrence and development of prostate cancer via regulating LINC00491/miR-532–3p axis. Chin J Androl. 2023;37(5):22–31.
Li W, et al. Curcumin inhibits prostate cancer by upregulating miR-483-3p and inhibiting UBE2C. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2024;38(2): e23645.
Zhang X, et al. Study of astragalus polysaccharide inhibits the proliferation, invasion and migration of prostate cancer DU145 cells by up regulating miR-133 a. Chin J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;39(3):395–9.
Guo S, et al. Astragalus polysaccharides inhibits tumorigenesis and lipid metabolism through miR-138-5p/SIRT1/SREBP1 pathway in prostate cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:598.
Lai W, et al. The regulatory effect of Microrna-188 on the proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cancer cells and the intervention mechanism of Guben Sanjie Formula. J Hubei Univ Chin Med. 2021;23(3):26–9.
Tu Y, et al. Mechanism of Yishen Tonglong Decoction inhibiting TLR4/p38 MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway against prostate cancer via upregulating miR-145-5p. Digital Chin Med. 2023;6(1):86–96.
Yuan, F. Mechanism study of astragalus blue formula affecting the proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through miR-1297/PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway. Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2023
Zheng L, et al. MiR-133a-5p inhibits androgen receptor (AR)-induced proliferation in prostate cancer cells via targeting FUsed in Sarcoma (FUS) and AR. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21(1):34–42.
Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–54.
Stylianopoulos T, Jain RK. Combining two strategies to improve perfusion and drug delivery in solid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(46):18632–7.
Wang H, et al. Recent progress in microRNA delivery for cancer therapy by non-viral synthetic vectors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;81:142–60.
Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):1–18.
Ma D, et al. Programing assembling/releasing multifunctional miRNA nanomedicine to treat prostate cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(8):9032–40.
Rotundo F, et al. miR-1272 exerts tumor-suppressive functions in prostate cancer via HIP1 Suppression. Cells. 2020;9:2.
Chun FK, et al. Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):851–64.
Partin AW, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. Multi-Institut Update JAMA. 1997;277(18):1445–51.
Boorjian SA, et al. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;181(1):95–104.
Hamid S, et al. The smarttarget biopsy trial: a prospective, within-person randomised, blinded trial comparing the accuracy of visual-registration and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound image-fusion targeted biopsies for prostate cancer risk stratification. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):733–40.
Coiner BL, et al. Gordetsky, diagnosis and pathologic reporting of prostate cancer in the era of MRI-targeted prostate biopsy. Surg Pathol Clin. 2022;15(4):609–16.
Barron N, et al. Biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy and miR-200a levels in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2012;72(11):1193–9.
Schaefer A, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of microRNA profiling in prostate carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1166–76.
Pashaei E, et al. Meta-analysis of miRNA expression profiles for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6): e0179543.
Schmidt L, et al. Training and validation of a novel 4-miRNA ratio model (MiCaP) for prediction of postoperative outcome in prostate cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(9):2003–9.
Huang X, et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):33–41.
Skog J, et al. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(12):1470–6.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors did not receive specific funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fan Yuan: performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft. Yue Hu: performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft. Yanmei Lei: conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft. Lingna Jin: conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, F., Hu, Y., Lei, Y. et al. Recent progress in microRNA research for prostate cancer. Discov Onc 15, 480 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01376-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01376-4