Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on Muris and Otgaar (2020): Let the Empirical Evidence Speak on the Self-Compassion Scale

  • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary addresses Muris and Otgaar’s (2020) paper titled “The Process of Science: A Critical Evaluation of More than 15 Years of Research on Self-Compassion with the Self-Compassion Scale.” The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is a multidimensional scale measuring self-compassion that includes subscales representing increased compassionate self-responding (CS)—self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness—and reduced uncompassionate self-responding (UCS)—self-judgment, isolation, and overidentification. Muris and Otgaar have proposed that a total SCS score should not be used because CS and UCS are separate and unrelated constructs. I propose that CS and UCS are distinct but related and that a total SCS score can validly be used. More than just asserting their viewpoint, however, Muris and Otgaar (2020) have made ad hominem attacks on any researchers who disagree with them as unscientific, irrational, or unethical. They claimed their position was irrefutable and that continued use of a total SCS score by researchers was evidence of bias. Although they acknowledged the need for empirical data confirming or disconfirming hypotheses generated by the different positions, they offered no confirmable hypotheses of their own and simply assumed the evidence supports their position. I lay out a series of ten hypotheses based on each position to test which is correct. The empirical evidence confirms the position that CS and UCS are related and that a total SCS score can be used, while disconfirming the position that CS and UCS are unrelated and that a total SCS score cannot be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.

  • Brenner, R. E., Heath, P. J., Vogel, D. L., & Credé, M. (2017). Two is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 696–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, R. E., Vogel, D. L., Lannin, D. G., Engel, K. E., Seidman, A. J., & Heath, P. J. (2018). Do self-compassion and self-coldness distinctly relate to distress and well-being? A theoretical model of self-relating. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(3), 346–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleare, S., Gumley, A., Cleare, C. J., & O’Conner, J. C. (2018). An investigation of the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness, 9(2), 618–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coroiu, A., Kwakkenbos, L., Moran, C., Thombs, B., Albani, C., Bourkas, S., Zenger, M., Brahler, E., & Korner, A. (2018). Structural validation of the Self-Compassion Scale with a German general population sample. PLoS One, 13(2), e0190771.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2016). Validation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Compassion Scale. Testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23, 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., Hunt, C., Harrysunker, A., Abbott, M. J., Beath, A. P., & Einstein, D. A. (2019). Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness, 10, 1455–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2000). Social mentalities: internal ‘social’ conflict and the role of inner warmth and compassion in cognitive therapy. In P. Gilbert & K. G. Bailey (Eds.), Genes on the couch: Exploration in evolutionary psychotherapy (pp. 118–150). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2005). Compassion: Conceptualizations, Research, and Use in Psychotherapy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2009). Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 15(3), 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 6–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 84, 239–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halamová, J., Kanovský, M., Petrocchi, N., Moreira, H., López Angarita, A. et al. (2020). The factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in eleven distinct populations across the world. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2020.1735203

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Understanding and treating human suffering. New York: Guilford.

  • Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. J., Parker, S. L., Doty, J. R., Cunnington, R., Gilbert, P., & Kirby, J. N. (2020). Neurophysiological and behavioural markers of compassion. Scientific Reports, 10:6789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63846-3.

  • Körner, A., Coroiu, A., Copeland, L., Gomez-Garibello, C., Albani, C., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2015). The role of self-compassion in buffering symptoms of depression in the general population. PLoS One, 10(10), e0136598.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Batts Allen, A., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: The implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longe, O., Maratos, F. A., Gilbert, P., Evans, G., Volker, F., Rockliff, H., et al. (2009). Having a word with yourself: Neural correlates of self-criticism and self-reassurance. Neuroimage, 49, 1849–1856.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s total score: Self-compassion versus self-criticism. PLoS One, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132940.

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 116–139.

  • Muris, P. (2016). A protective factor against mental health problems in youths? A critical note on the assessment of self-compassion. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1461–1465. http://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Mosewich_intervention.pdf.

  • Muris, P., & Otgaar, H. (2020). The process of science: A critical evaluation of more than 15 years of research on self-compassion with the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1469-1482.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01363-0.

  • Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(2), 373–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection as the mirror image of psychopathology: Further critical notes on the self-compassion scale. Mindfulness, 7(3), 787–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., van den Broek, M., Otgaar, H., Oudenhoven, I., & Lennartz, J. (2018). Good and bad sides of self-compassion: A face validity check of the self-compassion scale and an investigation of its relations to coping and emotional symptoms in non-clinical adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(8), 2411–2421.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Otgaar, H., Meesters, C., Heutz, A., & Van den Hombergh, M. (2019a). Self-compassion and adolescents’ positive and negative reactions to daily life problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1433–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Pfattheicher, S. (2019b). Stripping the forest from the rotten trees: Compassionate self-responding is a way of coping, but reduced uncompassionate self-responding mainly reflects psychopathology. Mindfulness, 10(1), 196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2003a). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2003b). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2016a). The Self-Compassion Scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2016b). Does self-compassion entail reduced self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification? A response to Muris, Otgaar, and Petrocchi (2016). Mindfulness, 7(3), 791–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2019). Setting the record straight about the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness, 10, 200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K., & Germer, C. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2020). Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). In O. N. Medvedev, C. U. Krägeloh, R. J. Siegert, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Handbook of assessment in mindfulness. New York: Springer. In press.

  • Neff, K. D., Whittaker, T., & Karl, A. (2017). Evaluating the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in four distinct populations: Is the use of a total self-compassion score justified? Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 596–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Long, P., Knox, M., Davidson, O., Kuchar, A., Costigan, A., Williamson, Z., Rohleder, N., Tóth-Király, I., & Breines, J. (2018a). The forest and the trees: Examining the association of self-compassion and its positive and negative components with psychological functioning. Self and Identity, 17(6), 627–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., & Colosimo, K. (2018b). Self-compassion is best measured as a global construct and is overlapping with but distinct from neuroticism: A response to Pfattheicher, Geiger, Hartung, Weiss, and Schindler (2017). European Journal of Personality, 32(4), 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., Guo, H. X., Hirsch, J., Hupfeld, J., Hutz, C., Kotsou, I., Lee, W. K., Montero-Marin, J., Sirois, F., de Souza, L., Svendsen, J., Wilkinson, R., & Mantios, M. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale using exploratory SEM bifactor analysis in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Bluth, K., Tóth-Király, I., Davidson, O., Knox, M. C., Williamson, Z., & Costigan, A. (2020a). Development and validation of the Self-Compassion Scale for Youth. Journal of Personality Assessment Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1729774.

  • Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Knox, M., Kuchar, A. & Davidson, O. (2020b). Examining self-compassion experimentally: The development and validation of a state self-compassion scale and mindstate induction. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, M. H., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Haltom, K. E., Leary, M. R., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2018). Self-compassion and responses to negative social feedback: The role of fronto-amygdala circuit connectivity. Self and Identity, 17(6), 723–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfattheicher, G., Hartung, W., & Schindler, S. (2017). Old wine in new bottles? The case of self-compassion and neuroticism. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. J. (2019). Self-compassion mindsets: The components of the Self-Compassion Scale operate as a balanced system within individuals. Current Psychology Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00452-1.

  • Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2020). The development and validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment, 127(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, J. L., Osnes, B., Binder, P. E., Dundas, I., Visted, E., Nordby, H., et al. (2016). Trait self-compassion reflects emotional flexibility through an association with high vagally mediated heart rate variability. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1103–1113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth-Király, I., & Neff, K. D. (2020). Is self-compassion universal? Support for the measurement invariance of the Self-Compassion Scale across populations. Assessment. In press.

  • Ullrich-French, S., & Cox, A. E. (2020). The use of latent profiles to explore the multi-dimensionality of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1483-1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01365-y.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway, Suite 504, Austin, TX, 78712-1289, USA

    Kristin D. Neff

Authors
  1. Kristin D. Neff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin D. Neff.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest

Ethical Approval

The manuscript does not involve human or animal participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neff, K.D. Commentary on Muris and Otgaar (2020): Let the Empirical Evidence Speak on the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness 11, 1900–1909 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01411-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01411-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation