Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of uncertain fuel costs on fossil fuel and electric energy flows in the US

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To explore the effects of uncertain fuel costs on the bulk energy flows in the US, we introduce stochastic fuel costs in a generalized network flow model of the integrated electric energy system, including coal, natural gas, and electricity generation. The fuel costs are modeled as discretely distributed random variables. A rolling two-stage recourse stochastic programming approach is employed to simulate the decision process involving uncertain costs with forecast updates. All the data are derived from publicly available information for the years 2002, when natural gas prices rose much higher than forecast, and 2006, when gas prices were lower than expected. Government forecasts of the natural gas prices are adapted to generate the scenarios considered in the stochastic formulation. Compared to the expected value solution from the deterministic model, the recourse solution found from the stochastic model for 2002 has higher total cost, lower natural gas consumption and less subregional power trade but a fuel mix that is closer to what actually occurred. The comparisons are qualitatively similar but muted in the 2006 case. The stochastic model assists decision makers to simulate the future flows within the national electric energy system and better understand how they are affected by uncertain fuel costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beale, E.M.L.: On minimizing a convex function subject to linear inequalities. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 17, 173–184 (1955)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Benders, J.F.: Partitioning procedures for solving mixed integer variables programming problems. Numer. Math. 4, 238–252 (1962)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolinger, M., Wiser, R., Golove, W.: Accounting for fuel price risk when comparing renewable to gas-fired generation: the role of forward natural gas prices. Energy Policy 34, 706–720 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, J.C., Dyer, J.S.: Optimizing natural gas flows with linear programming and scenarios. Decis. Sci. 30(2), 563–580 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dantzing, G., Glynn, P.: Parallel processors for planning under uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 22(1), 1–21 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dantzing, G.B.: Linear programming under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 1, 197–206 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dupac̆ová, J., Gröwe-Kuska, N., Römisch, W.: Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Math. Program. 95(3), 493–511 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. EIA: Short-term energy outlook January 2002. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/steo/oldsteos/jan02.pdf

  9. EIA: The national energy modeling system: an overview (2003). http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/overview/

  10. EIA: Short-term energy outlook January 2003. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/steo/oldsteos/jan03.pdf

  11. EIA: Annual energy review (2006). http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer/

  12. EIA: Short-term energy outlook January 2006. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/steo/oldsteos/jan06.pdf

  13. EIA: Short-term energy outlook January 2007. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/steo/oldsteos/jan07.pdf

  14. Greengard, C., Ruszczynski, A. (eds.): Decision Making under Uncertainty: Energy and Power. IMA Volumes on Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 128. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hogan, W.W.: Energy policy models for project independence. Comput. Oper. Res. 2, 251–271 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Infanger, G.: Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs. Ann. Oper. Res. 39(1), 65–95 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavenberg, S.S., Welch, P.D.: A perspective on the use of control variables to increase the efficiency of Monte Carlo simulations. Manag. Sci. 27(3), 322–335 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mulvey, J.M., Vladimirou, H.: Solving multistage stochastic networks: an application of scenario aggregation. Networks 21, 619–643 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy, F., Sen, S.: Qualitative implications of uncertainty in economic equilibrium models. In: Decision Making under Uncertainty: Energy and Power. IMA Volumes on Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 128, pp. 135–152. Springer, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy, F.H., Conti, J.J., Shaw, S.H., Sanders, R.: Modeling and forecasting energy markets with the intermediate future forecasting system. Oper. Res. 36(3), 406–420 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pereira, M.V.F., Pinto, L.M.V.G.: Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning. Math. Program. 52, 359–375 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Quelhas, AM: Economics efficiencies of the flows from the primary resource suppliers to the electric load centers. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University (2006)

  23. Quelhas, A., Gil, E., McCalley, J.: A multiperiod generalized network flow model of the US integrated energy system: Part II—simulation results. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(2), 837–844 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quelhas, A., Gil, E., McCalley, J., Ryan, S.M.: A multiperiod generalized network flow model of the US integrated energy system: Part I—model description. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(2), 829–836 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Römisch, W., Shapiro, A.: Stability of stochastic programming problem. In: Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10, pp. 483–554. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruszczyński, A., Shapiro, A.: Stochastic programming model. In: Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10, pp. 1–64. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Ryan, S.M., Downward, A., Philpott, A., Zakeri, G.: Welfare effects of expansions in equilibrium models of an electricity market with fuel network. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. (2010). doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2039587

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Slyke, R.M., Wets, R.: L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17(4), 638–663 (1969)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallace, S.W., Fleten, S.E.: Stochastic programming models in energy. In: Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10, pp. 637–677. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah M. Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Ryan, S.M. Effects of uncertain fuel costs on fossil fuel and electric energy flows in the US. Energy Syst 1, 209–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-010-0012-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-010-0012-7

Keywords

Navigation