Skip to main content
Log in

Functionalized Polypyrrole for Mild Steel Corrosion Protection in 15% HCl

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrosion protection of mild steel (MS) substrate is critical to prolonging the life of service equipment in refineries and chemical industries. In petroleum refineries, drilling and acidizing pipe work with vast amounts of 15% HCl that induce corrosion of MS pipelines. Here, a novel pentadecyl phenol (originated from cashew nut shell liquid)-functionalized conjugated polypyrrole (MPY) was synthesized and demonstrated for MS corrosion inhibition at a 15% HCl environment. Pentadecyl units provide hydrophobicity and form interdigitating layer structures to cover the metal substrate, which leads to better corrosion mitigation. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) studies reveal the superior corrosion inhibition performance of MPY on MS under 15% HCl conditions. The corrosion protection efficiency was determined to be 67.93% over MS substrate in the presence of MPY from PDP studies compared with pure MS.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papavinasam S, Corrosion control in the oil and gas industry, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-04629-X

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahimi A, Abdouss M, Farhadian A, Guo L, and Neshati J, Ind Eng Chem Res 60 (2021) 11030. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oyekunle D T, Agboola O, and Ayen A O, J Phy Conf Ser 1378 (2019) 032046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guezennec J G, Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 34 (1994) 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-8305(94)90088-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Subasri R, Shinohara T, and Mori K, Sci Technol Adv Mater 6 (2005) 501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2005.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cecchetto L, Delabouglise D, and Petit J P, Electrochim Acta 52 (2007) 3485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.10.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Selvaraj R, Selvaraj M, and Iyer S V K, Prog Org Coat 64 (2009) 454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chauhan D S, Ansari K R, Sorour A A, Quraishi M A, Lgaz H, and Salghi R, Int J Biol Macromol 107 (2018) 1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Townsend H E, Corros Sci 57 (2001) 497. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3290374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saxena N, Kumar S, and Mathur S P, Chem Eng Commun. 196 (2009) 1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440902938881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdallah M, El-Etre A Y, Soliman M G, and Mabrouk E M, Anti-Corros Method M 53 (2006) 118. https://doi.org/10.1108/00035590610650820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabirneeza A A F, Geethanjali R, and Subhashini S, Chem Eng Commun 202 (2015) 232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2014.934448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Farhadian A, Varfolomeev M A, Shaabani A, Nasiri S, Vakhitov I, Zaripova Y F, Yarkovoi V V, and Sukhov A V, Carbohydr Polym 236 (2020) 116035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Umoren S A, and Solomon M M, Corrosion inhibitors in oil and gas industry, Wiley, London (2020), p 303.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Spinks M, Dominis A J, and Wallace G G, J.Solid State Electrochem 6 (2002) 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100080100211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong P, Feng H, Chen N, Lu Y, and Wang P, RSC Adv 9 (2019) 9211. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra00029a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Biswas A, Pal S, and Udayabhanu G, Appl Surf Sci 353 (2015) 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeganeh M, Saremi M, and Rezaeyan H, Prog Org Coat 77 (2014) 1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.05.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, and Xing J, Int J Electrochem Sci 15 (2020) 1606. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.02.46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen B, Xu G, Wang L, Zhang C, Li C, Ju G, and Feng H, Res Sq (2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-958811/v1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Senthilkumar T, and Asha S K, Macromolecules 46 (2013) 2159. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma4000946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brezoi D Ş, J Sci arts 1 (2010) 53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai P Y, Chen T E, and Lee Y L, Coatings 8 (2018) 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8070250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Prakashaiah B G, Kumara D V, Pandith A A, and Shetty A N, Corros Sci. 136 (2018) 326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kesari P, and Udayabhanu G, Ain Shams Eng J 14 (2023) 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prakashaiah B G, Shetty A N, and Amitharani B E, Surf Eng Appl Electrochem 54 (2018) 286. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375518030109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Analytical Sciences Division of CSIR-IIP for analytical support. Authors Sachin and Nishtha Arora thank UGC for the research fellowship.

Funding

This work was supported by the CSIR-IIP project No. OLP-1183 for the research funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TS contributed to conceptualization and supervision; S and TS contributed to methodology; S, NA, BGP, and TS contributed to investigation; S, RCS, and TS contributed to writing and original draft preparation; RCS, BGP, SKG, and TS contributed to writing, reviewing, and editing; and RCS and TS contributed to visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Senthilkumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dua, S., Prakashaiah, B.G., Arora, N. et al. Functionalized Polypyrrole for Mild Steel Corrosion Protection in 15% HCl. Trans Indian Inst Met 77, 1313–1321 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03107-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03107-9

Keywords

Navigation