Skip to main content
Log in

Low Emission Sponge Iron Production in RHF: A CFD Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recycling iron-bearing solid wastes generated during iron and steelmaking processes is crucial for optimizing resource utilization and mitigating carbon emissions. The Rotary Hearth Furnace (RHF) has emerged as a promising alternative for sponge iron production from solid waste. This study developed a 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a pilot-scale RHF using the FLUENT solver to investigate use of hydrogen as a fuel. The results indicated that substituting hydrogen for hydrocarbon-based fuels led to a remarkable reduction in fuel and air consumption, resulting in increased profitability for direct reduced iron (DRI) production. Optimum conditions for post-combustion of CO, air, and fuel rate and their preheat temperature were identified to minimize fuel rate and emission, maximizing heat transfer to pellet bed, and maintaining a reducing atmosphere over pellet bed to restrict reoxidation of metalized pellet with hydrogen as heat-producing fuel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A, B :

Constant in the eddy-dissipation model

C1 ε, C 2 ε , C 3 ε ,C μ :

Constants in standard k—ε model

C p :

Specific heat at constant pressure

D i ,m :

Diffusion coefficient for species i in the mixture

E :

Total energy per unit mass

E a :

Activation energy

G k :

Production of turbulent kinetic energy by buoyancy

G t :

Production of turbulent kinetic energy by velocity gradient

g j :

Component of gravitational vector in the jth direction

k:

Turbulent kinetic energy

p:

Pressure

Prt :

Turbulent Prandtl number

R :

Universal gas constant

r:

Distance of a point from the centre of the pellet

S chem :

Source term of heat of chemical reaction

S rad :

Source term for heat of radiation

Sct :

Turbulent Schmidt number

T :

Temperature

t:

Time

u i :

Velocity component

Yi:

Mass fraction of species i

β :

Coefficient of thermal expansion

δ ij :

Kronecker delta

ε :

Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass

μ :

Molecular viscosity

μ e ff :

Effective viscosity

μ t :

Turbulent viscosity

v i, r :

Stoichiometric coefficient for reactant i in reaction r

\(v_{{{\text{i}},{\text{r}}}}^{\prime \prime }\) :

Stoichiometric coefficient for product i in reaction r

p:

Density

σ :

Stefan-Boltzmann constant

σ k :

Turbulent Prandtl number for k in standard k—ε model

σ ε :

Turbulent Prandtl number for ε in standard k—ε model

R total :

Total thermal resistance

q’’:

Total heat flux

h r :

Heat transfer coefficient for radiation

h c :

Heat transfer coefficient for convection

d ref :

Thickness of refractory wall

d shell :

Thickness of shell

k ref :

Thermal conductivity of refractory

k shell :

Thermal conductivity of shell

k c :

Thermal conductivity of air

T r :

Inside wall temperature of furnace

T w :

Outside shell temperature

T atm :

Ambient temperature

Nu:

Nusselt number

Ra:

Rayleigh number

Pr:

Prandlt number

Gr:

Grashof number

L c :

Characteristic length

H r :

Net heat effects of reaction r

q R :

Radiative heat transfer rate per unit area in the non-transparent gas

References

  1. Sen P K, and Roy G G, Trans Indian Inst Met 75 (2022) 2453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa H, Kopfle J, Mcclelland J, and Ripke J, Arch Metall Mater 53 (2008) 541.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu Y L, Jiang Z Y, Zhang X X, Wang P, and She X F, Int J Miner Metall Mater 20 (2013) 636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Y, Su F Y, Wen Z, Li Z, Yong H Q, and Feng X H, Metall Mater Trans B 45 (2014) 251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Wen Z, Lou G, Li Z, Yong H, and Feng X, Metall Mater Trans B 45 (2014) 2370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saleem S, and Roy G G, Ironmak Steelmak 48 (2021) 229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saleem S, and Roy G G, Metall Mater Trans B 51 (2020) 2735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas A K, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, SBA Publications, Calcutta, India (1981), p 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FLUENT 2021R2 User’s Guide, Fluent Inc., Southpointe (2021).

  10. Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Furnaces. https://beeindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/2Ch4.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2022.

  11. Touloukian Y S, Specif Heat Met Elem Alloys 4 (1966) 8–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gour Gopal Roy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tank, S., Saleem, S. & Roy, G.G. Low Emission Sponge Iron Production in RHF: A CFD Study. Trans Indian Inst Met (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03036-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03036-7

Keywords

Navigation