Abstract
Modern titanium alloys and innovative polymer composites are envisaged as promising contributors in developing composite multi-material aerospace structures in near future by aerospace industries. The structural complexity demands multiple parts, which are to be assembled by joining technique in order to accomplish the targeted lightweight structure. Conventional riveting techniques cause severe bearing damages while riveting composites due to the inference with non-uniformity and leads to restrict the application of conventional riveting in composites. Bolted joints are alternative solutions for composite structures. They however lead to increase in the weight and cost of the structures. Hence, electromagnetic riveting has emerged out as a promising candidate in the recent years, since it provides positive solutions with uniform interference and lightweight structures. The current work exhibits a comprehensive understanding on joining mechanism and nature of electromagnetic riveting toward the development of composite hybrid lightweight aerospace structures. Overcoming challenges such as inadequate degree of deformation and formability issues, electromagnetic riveting offers three times superior fatigue properties, uniformity in interference, minimal impact damage, homogeneous expansion, etc., that make it a lucrative choice for aerospace manufacturers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kleiner M, Geiger M, and Klaus A, CIRP Annals 52 (2003), 521.
Martinsen K, Hu S J, and Carlson BE, CIRP Annals - Manuf Technol 64 (2015), 679.
Kah P, Suoranta R, Martikainen J, and Magnus C, Adv Mater Sci Eng 36 (2014), 152.
Cao Z, Zuo Y, Chin J Aeron 33 (2020), 5.
Sun Z, Karppi R, J Mater Process Technol 59 (1996), 257.
Friedrich H E, Kopp D I G, Mater Sci Forum 539 (2007), 51.
Amancio-Filho ST, dos Santos J F, Polym Eng Sci 49 (2009), 1461.
Ageorges C, Ye L, Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32 (2001), 1603.
Hynes N RJ, Vignesh N J, Velu P S, J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42 (2020), 1.
Meschut G, Hahn O, Janzen, Olfermann T, Weld World 58 (2014), 65.
Deng J H, Tang C, Fu M W, Zhan Y R, Mater Sci Eng A 591 (2014), 26.
Deng JH, Yu H P, Li CF, Mater Sci Eng A 499 (2009), 242.
Sercer M, Raos P, Join Plast Compos (2007), 1.
Cao Z, Hall M C, Aerosp Sci Technol 10 (2006), 327.
Jiang H, Li G, Zhang X, Cui J, Compos Sci Technol 152 (2017), 1.
Sankaranarayanan R, Hynes N RJ, AIP Conf Proc 2142 (2019), 1500041.
Chowdhury N M, Wang J, Chiu W K, Chang P, Compos Struct 142 (2016), 96.
Thostenson E T, Chou T W, Compos Sci Technol 68 (2008), 2557.
Sankaranarayanan R, Hynes N RJ, AIP Conf Proc 1953 (2018), 1300211.
Thoppul S D, Finegan J, Gibson RF, Compos Scie Technol 69 (2009), 301.
Hynes N R J, Sankaranarayanan R, Sujana J A J, J Clean Prod (2020),
Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey B L, Tekkaya A E, Kleiner M, J Mater Process Technol 211 (2011), 787.
Repetto E A, Radovitzky R, Ortiz M, Lundquist R C, Sandstrom D R A, ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 121 (1999), 61.
Zhang X, Yu H P, Su H, Li CF, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83 (2016a),.
Li G, Jiang H, Zhang X, Cui J, J Manuf Process 26 (2017), 226.
Skorupa M, Machniewicz T, Skorupa A, Schijve J, Korbel A, Eng Failure Anal 53 (2015), 111.
Li J, Zhang K F, Li Y, Liu P, Xia J J, Tribol Int 93 (2016), 151.
Wei J C, Jiao G Q, Jia P R, Huang T, Compos Part B Eng 53 (2013), 62.
Li J, Li Y, Zhang K F, Liu P, Zou P, Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 38 (2015), 1359.
Gay A, Lefebvre F, Bergamo S, Valiorgue F, Chalandon P, Michel P, Bertrand P, Int J Fatigue 83 (2015), 127.
Jeon S W, Cho Y H, Han M G, Chang, S H, Compos Struct 152 (2016.), 538.
Saleem M, Zitoune R, Sawi I E, Bougherara H, Int J Fatigue 80 (2015), 246.
Olajide S O, Arhatari B D, Int J Fatigue 95 (2017), 45.
Jiang H, Luo T, Li G, Zhang X, Cui J, Int J Fatigue 105 (2017), 180.
Lambiase F, Ko D C, Compos Struct 164 (2017), 180.
Skorupa M, Machniewicz T, Skorupa A, Korbel A, Int J Fatigue 94 (2017), 41.
Choo V K S, Reinhall P G, Ghassaei S, J Mater Sci 24 (1989), 599.
Zhang X, Yu H P, Li C F, J Mater Process Technol 227 (2016b), 259.
Kumar D V T G P, Naarayan S S, Sundaram S K, Chandra S, Eng Failure Anal 20 (2012), 9.
Chen NJ, Luo HY, Wan M, Chenot J, J Mater Process Technol 214 (2014), 2049.
Bielawski R, Kowalik M, Suprynowicz K, Rzadkowski W, Pyrzanowski P, Mech Compos Mater 52 (2016), 199.
Zhang X, Zhang M, Sun L, Li C., Archiv Civil Mech Eng 18 (2018), 887.
Zhang X, Yu H P, Li C F, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73 (2014), 1751.
Aman F, Cheraghi S H, Krishnan K K, Lankarani H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67 (2013), 545.
Cheraghi S H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39 (2008), 1144.
Zhang X, Yu H P, Li J, Li C F, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78 (2015), 613.
Zhang X, He X, Xing B, Zhao L, Lu Y, Gu F, Ball A, Mater Design 97 (2016), 108.
Cao Z Q, A studying on electromagnetic riveting [dissertation], Xi’an, Northwestern Polytechnical University (2000).
Cao Z Q, Zuo Y J, Electromagnetic riveting, Beijing, National Defense Industry Press (2018).
Cui J, Dong D, Zhang X, Huang X, Lu G, Jiang H, Li G, Int J Impact Eng 115 (2018), 1.
Yoon T H, Kim S J, J Aircraft 48 (2011), 1434.
Acknowledgements
The authors Dr. N.Rajesh Jesudoss Hynes and R.Sankaranarayanan acknowledge the support and encouragement by Dr.S.Arivazhagan, Principal, and Dr.P.Nagaraj, Head of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College (Autonomous), Sivakasi—626005, Tamilnadu, India, toward this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sankaranarayanan, R., Hynes, N.R.J., Li, D. et al. Electromagnetic Riveting Technique of Joining Metals to Polymer Composites in Hybrid Multi-material Aerospace Structures. Trans Indian Inst Met 74, 2909–2924 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02247-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02247-0