Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Activated Flux, Optimization of Welding Parameters and Characterization of Weld Joint for DMR-249A Shipbuilding Steel

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present investigation aims to develop activated flux for joining of DMR-249A steel using activated tungsten inert gas (A-TIG) welding process and characterize the fabricated weld joint. The various combinations of fluxes were prepared to decide suitable flux for DMR-249A steel. The design of experiment was carried out for optimization of welding parameters to achieve the desired depth of penetration. The square butt weld joints were fabricated on 10 mm thick plates employing A-TIG welding using developed flux and optimized process parameters employing double side welding procedure. The microstructural investigations and hardness, tensile and impact tests were carried out on the base metal and weld joint. The strengths, ductility and impact toughness of the joints were found to be comparable with that of the base metal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malakondaiah G, in International Conference on Metals and Alloys: Past, Present and Future (2007), p 17.

  2. Mallik S, Minz B S, and Mishra B, Mater Sci Forum 710 (2012) 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. TWI GSP No. 5663, An Evaluation of the A-TIG Welding Process (1994).

  4. Sándor T, and Dobránszky J, Mater Sci Forum 537–538 (2007) 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka M, Shimzu T, Terasaki H, Ushio M, Koshi-ishi F, and Yang C L, Sci Technol Weld Join 5 (2000) 397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Savitskii M M, and Leskov G I, Avt Svarka 9 (1980) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heiple C R, and Roper R, Weld J 61 (1982) 97s.

  8. Simonik A G, Svar Proiz 3 (1976) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowke J J, Tanaka M, and Ushio M, J Phys D Appl Phys 38 (2005) 3438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. An international patent Tungsten Inert Gas Welding Flux for enhancing Penetration in Single Pass for austenitic stainless steels (patent no. PCT/IN06/00442/dt. 8/11/06).

  11. Vasudevan M, Bhaduri A K, and Baldev Raj, International Welding Congress Mumbai (2005), p 182.

  12. Vasudevan M, Bhaduri A K, and Raj B, International Welding Congress, Chennai (2008).

  13. Sakthivel T, Vasudevan M, Chandravathi K S, Laha K, Mathew M D, and Bhaduri A K, National Welding Seminar, Kolkata (2009).

  14. Sivaraman P, Mohamad M A, Krishnamoorthi M, Velusamy R, Vasudevan M, Bhaduri A K, Rao A S L K, and Baldev Raj, International Welding Congress, Chennai (2008).

  15. Palanichamy P, Vasudevan M, and Jayakumar T, Sci Technol Weld Join 14(2009) 166.

  16. Chandrasekhar N, Vasudevan M, and Bhaduri A K, National Welding Seminar, Kolkata (2009).

  17. Tseng K-H, Hsu C-Y, J Mater Process Technol 211 (2011) 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chern T-S, Tseng K-H, Tsai H-L, Mater Des 32 (2011), 255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakthivel T, Vasudevan M, Parmeshwaran P, Chandravathi K S, Laha K, Mathew M D, and Bhaduri A K, J Nucl Mater 413 (2011) 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pamnani R, Sharma G K, Mahadevan S, Jayakumar T, Vasudevan M, and Rao B P, J Manuf Process (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.09.004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM E384 - 11e1, Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials.

  22. ASTM E290 - 14, Standard Test Methods for Bend Testing of Material for Ductility.

  23. ASTM E23 - 12c, Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials.

  24. ASTM E8/E8 M - 15, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.

  25. Mills K C, and Keene B J, Int Mater Rev 35 (1990) 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heiple C R, Cluey R, and Dixon R D, Physical Metallurgy of Metal Joining. Metallurgical Society of AIME (1980), 160.

  27. Paskell T, Lundin C, and Castner H, GTAW Flux Increases Weld Joint Penetration, EWI, Ohio (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pollard B, Weld J 67 (1988) 202.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rishi Pamnani, Vasudevan M, Jayakumar T, and Vasantharaja P, J Mater Des Appl Part L (2015). doi:10.1177/1464420715596455.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Konkol P J, and Mruczek M F, Weld J (1998) 361s.

  31. Das H, and Pal T K, Indian Weld J 45 (2012).

  32. Kou S, Welding Metallurgy, Wiley (2003).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Pamnani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pamnani, R., Vasudevan, M., Jayakumar, T. et al. Development of Activated Flux, Optimization of Welding Parameters and Characterization of Weld Joint for DMR-249A Shipbuilding Steel. Trans Indian Inst Met 70, 49–57 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0857-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-016-0857-0

Keywords

Navigation