Skip to main content
Log in

Risk assessment approach for tunnel collapse based on improved multi-source evidence information fusion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tunnel collapses are common hazards in construction, and they significantly constraint construction progress and safety. Currently, research on the risk assessment of tunnel collapses primarily relies on a single source of information, which leads to distorted evaluations owing to the limitations of data sources. In contrast, using multi-source information offers strong adaptability, high credibility, and complementarity. Therefore, to enhance the accuracy of tunnel collapse risk assessments, this study proposes a novel approach that combines three types of information sources: historical engineering cases, expert knowledge, and on-site practical information. First, artificial neural networks, knowledge evaluation matrices, and cloud models are used to extract evidence from the three types of information sources, thereby acquiring preliminary evidence of collapse risk. When extracting expert knowledge information, an improved similarity aggregation method that comprehensively considers judgment ability and recognition is proposed to reduce the impact of expert subjectivity. Next, to address evidence conflicts in the fusion process, a distance metric based on belief intervals is constructed to calculate evidence credibility, and evidence importance is incorporated to reconstruct the multi-source evidence information. Subsequently, Dempster’s synthesis rule is used to fuse the reconstructed evidence, and the collapse risk is calculated by deblurring the fusion results. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the Yanglin Tunnel in China, and the results are consistent with the onsite construction situation. Therefore, the proposed method is feasible and practical, and it can provide a valid reference for risk assessment in similar projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets utilized or analyzed in the current research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Cai QJ, Hu QJ, Ma GL (2021) Improved hybrid reasoning approach to safety risk perception under uncertainty for mountain tunnel construction. J Constr Eng M 147:04021105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Sun FC, Ding LG, Wang HQ (2019a) An adaptive PNN-DS approach to classification using multi-sensor information fusion. Neural Comput Appl 31:693–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zhang GH, Wang H, Zhong GQ, Wang CT (2019b) Evaluation of possibility of tunnel collapse by drilling and blasting method based on T-S fuzzy fault tree. Rock Soil Mech 40:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zhang GH, Jiao YY, Wang H (2020) Unascertained measure-set pair analysis model of collapse risk evaluation in mountain tunnels and its engineering application. KSCE J Civ Eng 25:451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo K, Zhang LM (2021) Multi-source information fusion for safety risk assessment in underground tunnels. Knowl-Based Syst 227:107210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jousselme AL, Grenier D, Bossé É (2001) A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inform Fusion 2:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawal AI, Kwon S, Kim GY (2021) Prediction of an environmental impact of tunnel blasting using ordinary artificial neural network, particle swarm and dragonfly optimized artificial neural networks. Appl Acoust 181:108122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Liu CY, Gan WY (2009) A new cognitive model: Cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 24:357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li XB, Su YH (2016) A hybrid approach combining uniform design and support vector machine to probabilistic tunnel stability assessment. Struct Saf 61:22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang W, Gao XL, Zhou L (2019) Strong conflicting evidences fusion based on belief interval distance measurement. Cluster Comput 22:6589–6598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SL, Li WP (2019) Fuzzy comprehensive risk evaluation of roof water inrush based on catastrophe theory in the Jurassic coalfield of northwest China. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37:2101–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GF, Jiang Q, Feng GL, Chen DF, Chen BR, Zhao ZN (2021) Microseismicity-based method for the dynamic estimation of the potential rockburst scale during tunnel excavation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:3605–3628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YW, Cheng YQ, Zhang ZZ, Wu JJ (2022) Multi-information fusion fault diagnosis based on KNN and improved evidence theory. J Vib Eng Technol 10:841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma SL, Jia BW, Wu JW, Yuan Y, Jiang Y, Li WX (2021) Multi-vibration information fusion for detection of HVCB faults using CART and D-S evidence theory. ISA T 113:210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Noori K, Khishe M, Ibrahim HH, Ali HFH, Abdulhamid SN (2021) Presenting the best prediction model of water inflow into drill and blast tunnels among several machine learning techniques. Automat Constr 127:103719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao PY, Xing GH, Ma SC, Srimahachota T (2023) Deep learning-based inspection data mining and derived information fusion for enhanced bridge deterioration assessment. J Bridge Eng 28:04023048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou GZ, Jiao YY, Zhang GH, Zou JP, Tan F, Zhang WS (2021) Collapse risk assessment of deep-buried tunnel during construction and its application. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 115:104019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Zhang LM, Wu XG, Skibniewski MJ (2020) Multi-classifier information fusion in risk analysis. Inform Fusion 60:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian QH (2012) Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31:1945–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu DH, Chen QQ, Xue YG, Su MX, Liu Y, Cui JH, Zhou BH (2021) A new method for risk assessment of water inrush in a subsea tunnel crossing faults. Mar Georesour Geotec 40:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan X, Liu K, Sun P (2017) Risk analysis on leakage failure of natural gas pipelines by fuzzy Bayesian network with a Bow-Tie model. Sci Program. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3639524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi SS, Xie XK, Bu L, Li LP, Zhou ZQ (2018) Hazard-based evaluation model of water inrush disaster sources in karst tunnels and its engineeringapplication. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song XJ, Hua X, Fang SR, Wei ZX, Yin C (2020) Seismic risk evaluation for a planning mountain tunnel using improved analytical hierarchy process based on extension theory. J Mt Sci-Engl 17:244–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun JL, Liu BG, Chu ZF, Chen L, Li X (2018a) Tunnel collapse risk assessment based on multistate fuzzy Bayesian networks. Qual Reliab Eng Int 34:1646–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun JL, Liu BG, Chu ZF, Ren DR, Song Y (2018b) Type classification and main characteristics of tunnel collapses. China Railway Sci 39:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Liu DF, Ding H, Singh VP, Wang YK (2016a) A cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment. Environ Res 148:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yin X, Jing HW, Liu RC, Su HJ (2016b) A novel cloud model for risk analysis of water inrush in karst tunnels. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TH, Liu RJ, Qi GH (2022) Multi-classification assessment of bank personal credit risk based on multi-source information fusion. Expert Syst Appl 191:116236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Z, Xiong ZM, Lu H, Xia YP (2019) Optimisation of treatment scheme for water inrush disaster in tunnels based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in an uncertain environment. Arab J Sci Eng 44:8249–8263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XG, Duan JC, Zhang LM, AbouRizk SM (2018) A hybrid information fusion approach to safety risk perception using sensor data under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Yi X, Li SM (2020) Conflict evidence combination method based on interval distance. Acta Armamentarii 41:1140–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Qiu WX, Huang W, Meng GW, Nong Y, Huang JS (2022) A multi-source information fusion evaluation method for the tunneling collapse disaster based on the artificial intelligence deformation prediction. Arab J Sci Eng 47:5053–5071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie SY, Chen YN, Dong SH, Zhang GY (2020) Risk assessment of an oil depot using the improved multi-sensor fusion approach based on the cloud model and the Belief Jensen-Shannon divergence. J Loss Prev Process Ind 67:104214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie XK, Shi SS, Bu L, Li LP, Sun KG, Liu HL (2021) Dynamic optimization risk assessment model and control measures for tunnel collapse and its engineering application. Himal Geol 42:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZH, Li SC, Li LP, Hou JG, Sui B (2011) Risk assessment of water or mud inrush of karst tunnels based on analytic hierarchy process. Rock Soil Mech 32:1757–1766

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Tong L, Liu S, Li H (2019) Evaluation model for immersed tunnel health state: A case study of Honggu Tunnel, Jiangxi Province, China. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 90:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZG, Cai NG, Li XF, Xian MT, Dong TW (2021) Risk assessment of loess tunnel collapse during construction based on an attribute recognition model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:6205–6220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue YG, Li X, Li GK, Qiu DH, Gong HM, Kong FM (2020) An analytical model for assessing soft rock tunnel collapse risk and its engineering application. Geomech Eng 23:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao S, Guo YJ, Huang WQ (2010) An improved method of aggregation in DS/AHP for multi-criteria group decision-making based on distance measure. Control Decis 25:894–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Yang JH, Yang DB, Ma XH, Min H (2015) An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance. Expert Syst Appl 42:5139–5149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wei ZZ (2019) Dynamic weight-based multi-features fuzzy fusion for recovery-decision of waste lubrication oil. Cluster Comput 22:7603–7610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Jiao YY, Chen LB, Wang H, Li SC (2016a) Analytical model for assessing collapse risk during mountain tunnel construction. Can Geotech J 53:326–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LM, Wu XG, Qin YW, Skibniewski MJ, Liu WL (2016b) Towards a fuzzy bayesian network based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage. Risk Anal 36:278–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LM, Wu XG, Zhu HP, AbouRizk SM (2016c) Perceiving safety risk of buildings adjacent to tunneling excavation: An information fusion approach. Automat Constr 73:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LM, Ding LY, Wu XG, Skibniewski MJ (2017) An improved Dempster-Shafer approach to construction safety risk perception. Knowl-Based Syst 132:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Chen W, Jiao YY, Wang H, Wang CT (2020) A failure probability evaluation method for collapse of drill-and-blast tunnels based on multistate fuzzy Bayesian network. Eng Geol 276:105752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HJ, Wu SC, Han LQ, Ren ZJ (2022) Heterogeneous ensemble evaluation method of rock mass quality based on improved Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Rock Soil Mech 43:532–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Zhao YH, Shen Q, Yang L, Cai HB (2020) Risk assessment and management via multi-source information fusion for undersea tunnel construction. Automat Constr 111:103050

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are extremely grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 71631007) and Traffic Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province ([2020]50).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: RH, BL; Methodology: RH, BL, JS; Investigation: YS, MY, TD; Writing–original draft: RH; Data curation: RH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, R., Liu, B., Sun, J. et al. Risk assessment approach for tunnel collapse based on improved multi-source evidence information fusion. Environ Earth Sci 83, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11313-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11313-3

Keywords

Navigation