Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the usability of wide wheel abrasion test on rock core samples

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the usability of the wide wheel abrasion test (WA) on rock cores using a newly designed core holder apparatus is investigated. The WA test which has been proposed to determine the abrasion resistance of rocks used as natural building stones is carried out on only prismatic samples. In the design of rock engineering structures such as tunnels, dams and investigations for various purposes, samples are supplied as cylindrical cores from exploration drillings. The applicability of this test on cylindrical samples is the scope of this study. Physical and mechanical properties of nine types of rock materials are determined on these core samples in accordance with the relevant standards and suggested methods. In the context of this study, core samples with average diameters of 26.76, 39.72, 47.80, 58.16 and 67.51 mm were prepared. After that, the wide wheel abrasion tests on core samples (IA) were carried out. It is obvious that the abrasion values obtained on samples with different diameters will differ. To overcome this uncertainty applying core abrasion test on samples with 50 mm diameter is suggested and it is proposed as core abrasion index (IA-50). If needed, applicability of IA-50 test on half-cut cores (IA-HC) was also investigated, and significant linear correlation was obtained. IA-50 values were correlated with rock material parameters and significant relationships were proposed. It is believed that practical, economical, and non-destructive determination of IA-50 values will be effective to make the approach more widespread, and it will be useful in various rock engineering applications as a new parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated during this study can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

References

  • Abu Bakar M, Majeed Y, Rostami J (2016) Effects of rock water content on CERCHAR abrasivity index. Wear 368:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ameen SI, Waller MD (1994) The influence of rock strength and abrasive mineral content on the cerchar abrasive index. Eng Geol 36(3–4):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber M (2008) Stress dependency of the Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI) and its effects on wear of selected rock cutting tools. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 23(4):351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber M, Yaralı O, Dahl F, Bruland A, Käsling H, Michalakopoulos TN, Cardu M, Hagan P, Aydın H, Özarslan A (2014) ISRM suggested method for determining the abrasivity of rock by the CERCHAR abrasivity test. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldeeky H, Al Hattamleh O, Rababah S (2020) Assessing the uniaxial compressive strength and tangent Young’s modulus of basalt rock using the Leeb rebound hardness test. Mater Construcc 70(340):230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 19:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki H, Matsukura Y (2008) Estimating the unconfined compressive strength of intact rocks from equotip hardness. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67(1):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson T, Cassapi VB, Singh RN (1986) Assessment of abrasive wear resistance potential in rock excavation machinery. Int J Min Geol Eng 4(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente D, Fort R, Gomez-Heras M (2021) Improving uniaxial compressive strength estimation of carbonate sedimentary rocks by combining minimally invasive and non-destructive techniques. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 147:104915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik SB (2018) Investigation of abrasion resistance of carbonate rocks by wide wheel abrasion test. Fırat Univ J Eng Sci 30(1):303–310 ((In Turkish))

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelik SB, Çobanoğlu İ (2019) Comparative investigation of shore, schmidt, and leeb hardness tests in the characterization of rock materials. Environ Earth Sci 78(18):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik SB, Çobanoğlu İ (2022) Modelling and estimation of wide wheel abrasion values of building stones by multivariate regression and artificial neural network analyses. J Build Eng 45:103443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çobanoğlu İ, Çelik SB (2017) Assessments on the usability of wide wheel (capon) test as reference abrasion test method for building stones. Constr Build Mater 151:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çobanoğlu İ, Çelik SB, Alkaya D (2010) Correlation between wide wheel abrasion (capon) and Bohme abrasion test results for some carbonate rocks. Sci Res Essays 5(22):3398–3404

    Google Scholar 

  • Corkum AG, Asiri Y, El Naggar H, Kinakin D (2018) The leeb hardness test for rock: an updated methodology and UCS correlation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels G, McPhee C, McCurdy P, Sorrentino Y (2012) Non-destructive strength index testing applications for sand failure evaluation. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia

  • Deliormanlı AH (2012) Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI) and its relation to strength and abrasion test methods for marble stones. Constr Build Mater 30:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desarnaud J, Kiriyama K, Simsir BB, Wilhelm K, Viles H (2019) A laboratory study of equotip surface hardness measurements on a range of sandstones: what influences the values and what do they mean? Earth Surf Proc Land 44:1419–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN 14157 (2017) Natural stones—determination of abrasion resistance. European Standard, pp 19

  • Gomez-Heras M, Benavente D, Pla C, Martinez-Martinez J, Fort R, Brotons V (2020) Ultrasonic pulse velocity as a way of improving uniaxial compressive strength estimations from Leeb hardness measurements. Constr Build Mater 261:119996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güneş Yılmaz N (2013) The influence of testing procedures on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of carbonate rocks from equotip hardness tester (EHT) and proposal of a new testing methodology: hybrid dynamic hardness (HDH). Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(1):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güneş Yılmaz N, Göktan RM (2019) Comparison and combination of two NDT methods with implications for compressive strength evaluation of selected masonry and building stones. Bull of Eng Geol Environ 78(6):4493–4503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, ISRM, Compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, pp 628

  • ISRM (2015) The ISRM suggested method for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. In: Ulusay R (ed) Springer, Berlin

  • Karaca Z, Güneş Yılmaz N, Göktan RM (2012) Considerations on the European Standard EN 14157 test methods: abrasion resistance of natural stones used for flooring in buildings. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki S, Tanimoto C, Koizumi K, Ishikawa M (2002) An attempt to estimate mechanical properties of rocks using the equotip hardness tester. J Soc Eng Geol 43(4):244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolgitti T (2022) Investigation of the applicability of the wide wheel abrasion test on rock core samples. Pamukkale University M.Sc. thesis (In Turkish)

  • Lee JS, Smallwood L, Morgan E (2014) New application of rebound hardness numbers to generate logging of unconfined compressive strength in laminated shale formations. In: 48th US rock mechanics—geomechanics symposium, vol 2, pp 972–978

  • Marini P, Bellopede R, Perino L, De Regibus C (2011) Optimisation of an abrasion resistance test method on natural stones. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulenkamp F, Grima MA (1999) Application of neural networks for the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) from equotip hardness. Int J Rock Mech Min 36(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özvan A, Direk N (2021) The relationships among different abrasion tests on deteriorated and undeteriorated rocks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80(2):1745–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plinninger RJ (2010) Hardrock abrasivity investigation using the rock abrasivity index (RAI). In: Williams et al. (eds) Geologically active. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 3445–3452

  • Rostami J, Ghasemi A, Gharahbagh EA, Dogruoz C, Dahl F (2014) Study of dominant factors affecting Cerchar abrasivity index. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(5):1905–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strzałkowski P, Kaźmierczak U, Wolny M (2020) Assessment of the method for abrasion resistance determination of sandstones on Böhme abrasion test apparatus. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79(9):4947–4956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suana M, Peters T (1982) The Cerchar abrasivity index and its relation to rock mineralogy and petrography. Rock Mech 15(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teymen A (2020) The usability of cerchar abrasivity index for the estimation of mechanical rock properties. Int J Rock Mech Min 128:104258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwaal W, Mulder A (1993) Estimating rock strength with the equotip hardness tester. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(6):659–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Pamukkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit under a project (2021FEBE028) and this support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to thank Prof. Dr. Tamer Koralay for his contribution in petrographic analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.K. and S.B.Ç. were conducted the lab studies. Figures were prepared by T.K., main manuscript was prepared by S.B.Ç., both authors discussed and reviewed on the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sefer Beran Çelik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolgitti, T., Çelik, S.B. Investigation of the usability of wide wheel abrasion test on rock core samples. Environ Earth Sci 81, 540 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10661-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10661-w

Keywords

Navigation