Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Topographic classification of North Eastern Region of India using geospatial technique and following seismic code provisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of high-resolution digital elevation models (DEM) and advancements in geospatial techniques enable a more accurate measure of slope position classes and classification of landforms using algorithms like topographic position index (TPI). In this study, TPI-based slope position classes are used for the identification of major relief features like ridges, and these are embedded with DEM-derived terrain slope to perform the topographic amplification-based classification of the North Eastern Region (NER) of India, according to the present European (Eurocode-8) and Italian seismic codes using GIS tools. They are classified into four topographic classes: T1, T2, T3, and T4. The relation of geological units, seismic site classification map, and land use land cover (LULC) classes with identified topographic classes for the study region are analyzed. The results reveal that ~ 25% of the study area is a potentially high amplification zone (T4 class; amplification factor of 1.4 as per Eurocode-8), primarily associated with dense and light vegetation type land cover. The Indian seismic recording station sites and the epicenters of past earthquake events in the region are classified based on the obtained topographic classification map. Approximately, 47% of earthquake events of large magnitudes and ~ 30% of strong motion network (SMN) station sites are in localities with potential topographic effects. The human settlements are predominantly found in places identified with no or minimal amplification zone (T1 class; amplification factor of 1). The presented topographic classification map of NER can assist the decision-makers and authorities to identify potentially high amplification areas considering seismic hazards and making choices for future infrastructural development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Agrawal N, Gupta L, Dixit J (2021) Assessment of the socioeconomic vulnerability to seismic hazards in the national capital region of India using factor analysis. Sustainability 13(17):9652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal N, Gupta L, Dixit J (2022) Geospatial assessment of active tectonics using SRTM DEM-based morphometric approach for Meghalaya, India. All Earth 34(1):39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TI, Wald DJ (2009) On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (VS30). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2A):935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Gazetas G (2004) Soil and topographic amplification on canyon banks and the 1999 Athens earthquake. J Earthquake Eng 8(1):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association Française du Génie Parasismique (1990) AFPS 90, Recommendations for the redaction of rules relative to the structures and installations built in regions prone to earthquakes. French Association for Earthquake Engineering

  • Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG (2005) Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(7–10):547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, Mcdonnell RA, Lloyd CD (2015) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon EC, Dutta U (2015) Evaluating topographically-derived Vs30 values for seismic site class characterization in. In: Proc. of the 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, pp 2–4

  • Das S, Patel PP, Sengupta S (2016) Evaluation of different digital elevation models for analyzing drainage morphometric parameters in a mountainous terrain: a case study of the Supin-Upper Tons Basin. Indian Himalayas Springerplus 5(1):1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • De Reu J, Bourgeois J, Bats M, Zwertvaegher A, Gelorini V, De Smedt P, Chu W, Antrop M, De Maeyer P, Finke P, Van Meirvenne M (2013) Application of the topographic position index to heterogeneous landscapes. Geomorphology 186:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Gaudio V, Wasowski J (2011) Advances and problems in understanding the seismic response of potentially unstable slopes. Eng Geol 122(1–2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1994) Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions. Geophys Res Lett 21(20):2191–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Capua G, Lanzo G, Pessina V, Peppoloni S, Scasserra G (2011) The recording stations of the Italian strong motion network: geological information and site classification. Bull Earthq Eng 9(6):1779–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit J, Dewaikar DM, Jangid RS (2012) Free field surface motion at different site types due to near-fault ground motions. ISRN Geophys 821051:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/821051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit J, Raghukanth STG, Dash SK (2016) Spatial distribution of seismic site coefficients for Guwahati city. In: Raju N (ed) Geostatistical and geospatial approaches for the characterization of natural resources in the environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18663-4_80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasi J, Bastami M, Kamalian M, Derakhshandi M (2021) Influence of the topographic effect on the seismic response of buried pipelines. Geoenviron Dis 8(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998–5 (2004) Eurocode 8–design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. Online Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/en.1998.5.2004.pdf

  • Faccioli E, Vanini M, Frassine L (2002) Complex site effects in earthquake ground motion, including topography. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering (844). Barbican Centre, London, UK

  • Falcone G, Boldini D, Amorosi A (2018) Site response analysis of an urban area: A multi-dimensional and non-linear approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 109:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone G, Boldini D, Martelli L, Amorosi A (2020a) Quantifying local seismic amplification from regional charts and site specific numerical analyses: a case study. Bull Earthq Eng 18(1):77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone G, Mendicelli A, Mori F, Fabozzi S, Moscatelli M, Occhipinti G, Peronace E (2020b) A simplified analysis of the total seismic hazard in Italy. Eng Geol 267:105511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Zhang N, Li D, Liu H, Cai Y, Wu Y (2012) Effects of topographic amplification induced by a U-shaped canyon on seismic waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(4):1748–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesch D, Oimoen M, Danielson J, Meyer D (2016) Validation of the ASTER global digital elevation model vol 3 over the conterminous United States. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 41:143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann CH, Riccomini C (2009) Comparison of roving-window and search-window techniques for characterising landscape morphometry. Comput Geosci 35(10):2164–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta L, Dixit J (2022) A GIS-based flood risk mapping of Assam, India, using the MCDA-AHP approach at the regional and administrative level. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2060329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta L, Agrawal N, Dixit J (2021) Spatial distribution of bedrock level peak ground acceleration in the national capital region of India using geographic information system. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12(1):3287–3316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta L, Agrawal N, Dixit J, Dutta S (2022) A GIS-based assessment of active tectonics from morphometric parameters and geomorphic indices of Assam region, India. J Asian Earth Sci X 8(1):100115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough SE, Altidor JR, Anglade D, Given D, Janvier MG, Maharrey JZ, Meremonte M, Mildor BSL, Prepetit C, Yong A (2010) Localized damage caused by topographic amplification during the 2010 M 7.0 Haiti earthquake. Nat Geosci 3(11):778–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurukawa N, Tun PP, Shibazaki B (2012) Detailed geometry of the subducting Indian Plate beneath the Burma Plate and subcrustal seismicity in the Burma Plate derived from joint hypocenter relocation. Earth Planets Space 64(4):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893 (2016), Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures—General Provisions and Buildings Part-1, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  • ISC (2021) International seismological centre, ISC-GEM earthquake catalogue 2021. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31905/D808B825 [Accessed January 10, 2022]

  • Jafarzadeh F, Shahrabi MM, Jahromi HF (2015) On the role of topographic amplification in seismic slope instabilities. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7(2):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness J, Brost B, Beier P (2013) Land facet corridor designer. USDA forest service rocky mountain research station. http://www.jennessent.com/arcgis/land_facets.htm [Accessed January 10, 2022]

  • Karra K, Kontgis C, Statman-Weil Z, Mazzariello JC, Mathis M, Brumby SP (2021) Global land use/land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. In: 2021 IEEE International geoscience and remote sensing symposium IGARSS pp 4704–4707

  • Kawase H, Aki K (1990) Topography effect at the critical SV-wave incidence: possible explanation of damage pattern by the Whittier narrows, California, earthquake of 1 October 1987. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, De R (1991) Microseismicity and tectonics in northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(1):131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Meijde MVD, Werff HVD, Shafique M (2020) The impact of topography on seismic amplification during the 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Nat Hazard 20(2):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Narayan JP, Kumar V, Tiwari V (2021) Effects of shape and complexity of ridge topography on the comparative amplification scenario for the SH-and SV-waves. J Earth Syst Sci 130(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascandola C, Luzi L, Felicetta C, Pacor F (2021) A GIS procedure for the topographic classification of Italy, according to the seismic code provisions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 148:106848–106848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal H, Kumar A, Ramhmachhuani R (2012) Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations. Int J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2012.326117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokarram M, Roshan G, Negahban S (2015) Landform classification using topography position index (case study: salt dome of Korsia-Darab plain, Iran). Model Earth Syst Environ 1(4):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina S, Lang DH, Singh Y, Meslem A (2019) A period-dependent topographic amplification model for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 17(7):3709–3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monserud RA, Leemans R (1992) Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecol Model 62(4):275–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair HC, Joseph A, Gopinathan VP (2018) GIS Based landform classification using digital elevation model: a case study from two river basins of Southern Western Ghats. Modeling Earth Syst Environ 4(4):1355–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy DR (2001) Geodynamics of Northeastern India and the adjoining region. Scientific book centre, Guwahati, Assam, Revised Edition 2017

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Adhikari MD, Nayak A, Devaraj N, Ghosh SK, Mahajan AK (2013) Topographic gradient based site characterization in India complemented by strong ground-motion spectral attributes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 55:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCS-MOES (2021) National center for seismology, ministry of earth sciences, government of India 2021. https://seismo.gov.in/MIS/riseq/ob_network; https://seismo.gov.in/MIS/riseq/earthquake/archive [Accessed January 10, 2022]

  • NTC2018 (2018) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni 2018, Il Ministro delle infrastrutture, Decreto 17 Gennaio 2018, 530

  • Pan H, Jiang X (2020) On the characteristics of ground motion and the improvement of the input mode of complex layered sites. Civil Eng J 6(5):848–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci R (2002) Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 31(10):1831–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessina V, Fiorini E (2014) A GIS procedure for fast topographic characterization of seismic recording stations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 63:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham HT, Marshall L, Johnson F, Sharma A (2018) A method for combining SRTM DEM and ASTER GDEM2 to improve topography estimation in regions without reference data. Remote Sens Environ 210:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignalosa A, Forte G, Budetta P, Santo A (2022) Topographic amplification and debris remobilization as a cause for increasing rockfall hazard in seismic areas: a case study in Central Italy. Geomorphology 403:108160–108160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poursartip B, Fathi A, Kallivokas LF (2017) Seismic wave amplification by topographic features: a parametric study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:503–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Dixit J, Dash SK (2011) Ground motion for scenario earthquakes at Guwahati city. Acta Geod Geoph Hung 46:326–346. https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.46.2011.3.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo D, Bielak J, Serrano R, Gómez J, Jaramillo J (2016) Effects of realistic topography on the ground motion of the Colombian Andes-a case study at the Aburrá Valley. Antioquia Geophys J Int 204(3):1801–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy L, Das S (2021) GIS-based landform and LULC classifications in the Sub-Himalayan Kaljani Basin: Special reference to 2016 Flood. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 24(3):755–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu M, Sharma B, Mittal H, Chingtham P (2020) Analysis of the site effects in the North East region of India using the recorded strong ground motions from moderate earthquakes. J Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1724214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda SA, Murphy W, Jibson RW, Petley DN (2005) Seismically induced rock slope failures resulting from topographic amplification of strong ground motions: the case of Pacoima canyon. Calif Eng Geol 80(3–4):336–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani MJ, Ghanbari A (2020) Design curves for estimation of amplification factor in the slope topography considering nonlinear behavior of soil. Indian Geotech J 50(6):907–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tağıl Ş, Jenness J (2008) GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. J Appl Sci 8:910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2021) US Geological survey national earthquake information center 2021 https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/ [Accessed January 10, 2022]

  • Varade D, Sure A, Dikshit O (2019) Potential of landsat-8 and sentinel-2A composite for land use land cover analysis. Geocarto Int 34(14):1552–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinod PG (2017) Development of topographic position index based on Jenness algorithm for precision agriculture at Kerala. India Spatial Spatial Inf Res 25(3):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Allen TI (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1379–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. In:Poster presentation, ESRI user conference, San Diego, CA (Vol. 200)

  • Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Disaster Management Laboratory, Shiv Nadar University, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Delhi NCR, 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Navdeep Agrawal & Jagabandhu Dixit

Authors
  1. Navdeep Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jagabandhu Dixit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagabandhu Dixit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agrawal, N., Dixit, J. Topographic classification of North Eastern Region of India using geospatial technique and following seismic code provisions. Environ Earth Sci 81, 436 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10556-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10556-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation