Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

GIS Based landform classification using digital elevation model: a case study from two river basins of Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to classify/characterize the landforms within a river basin using complex spatial information and GIS application to recognize and extort geomorphologic properties of Digital Elevation model with 30 m resolution. The landform classification is based on the Topographic position index (TPI) of the area under study—the Ithikkara and Kallada river basins, Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. The TPI generated was used for classifying the landscape to slope position index and landform classes. The slope position classes identified are Ridges/Hilltop/Canyon edge, Upper slope, Mid slope, Flat, Lower slope and Valley. The Landform classes includes (1) Canyons, deeply incised streams, (2) Midslope drainages, shallow valleys, (3) Upland drainages, headwaters, (4) U-shaped valleys, (5) Plains, (6) Open slopes, (7) Upper slopes, mesas, (8) Local ridges/hills in valleys, (9) Midslope ridges, small hills in plains and (10) Mountain tops, high ridges. 50.23% of the study area belongs to the slope position class—Ridges/Hilltop/Canyon edge. 30% of the study area is occupied by the landform class Canyons and deeply incised streams followed by Mountain tops and high ridges which covers 28.16%. The U shaped valleys represent 12.32% of the study area. The validation of landform classes is done by overlaying the stream network of the basin is into the landform classes, which is perfectly overlapping with the U shaped valleys of the landform classes. The classification of landform from the study can be used in applications related to precision agriculture, land use alteration studies where the most dominant factor is landform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dickson BG, Jenness JS, Beier P (2005) Influence of vegetation, topography, and roads on cougar movement in southern California. J Wildl Mgmt 69:264–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans S (1990) General Geomorphometry. In: Goudie AS, Anderson M, Burt T, Lewin J, Richards K, Whalley B, Worsley P (eds) Geomorphological techniques, 2nd edn. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels JE, Zobel R (1995) Landscape position and classified landtype mapping for statewide DRASTIC mapping project. North Carolina State University Technical Report

  • Florinsky V, Eilers RG, Manning G, Fuller LG (2002) Prediction of soil properties by digital terrain modelling. Environ Model Softw 17: 295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerçek D (2010) Object-based classification of landforms based on their local geometry and geomorphometric context. PhD Diss., University of Middle East Technical

  • Ghosh T, Kanchan R (2016) Aquifer vulnerability assessment in the Bengal alluvial tract, India, using GIS based DRASTIC model. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0208-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2005) Geology and mineral resources of the states of India, part IX—Kerala (pp 21–22). Geological survey of India, miscellaneous publication no. 30

  • Hema CN, Padmalal D, Ammini J (2015) Hydrochemical assessment of tropical springs—a case study from SW India. Environ Monit 187:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayadev SK (2012) The status of wetland in Kollam district. Phd Thesis University of Kerala

  • Jenness J (2005) Topographic Position Index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 1.3a. Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm

  • Jothibasu A, Anbazhagan S (2016) Modeling groundwater probability index in Ponnaiyar River basin of South India using analytic hierarchy process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0174-y

  • Marzieh Mokarram M, Roshan G, Negahban S (2015) Landform classification using topography position index (case study: salt dome of Korsia-Darab plain, Iran). Model Earth Syst Environ.1:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0055-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael EA, Samanta S (2016) Landslide vulnerability mapping (LVM) using weighted linear combination (WLC) model through remote sensing and GIS techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0141-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokarram M, Sathyamoorthy D (2015) Modeling the relationship between elevation, aspect and spatial distribution of vegetation in the Darab Mountain, Iran using remote sensing data. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0038-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakoksung K, Takagi M (2015) Remote sensing data application for ood modeling. J Appl Surv Technol 26:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakoksung K, Takagi M (2016) Digital elevation models on accuracy validation and bias correction in vertical Model. Earth Syst Environ 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0069-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner AKühni OA (2001) The relief of the Swiss Alps and adjacent areas and its relation to lithology and structure—topographic analysis from 250-M DEM. Geomorphology 41:285–307. 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike RJ (1999) A bibliography of geomorphometry, the quantitative representation of topography supplement 3 (open-file report 99–140), US. Geological Survey

  • Rasemann S, Schmidt J, Schrott L, Dikau R (2004) Geomorphometry in mountain terrain. In: Bishop MP, Shroder JF (eds) GIS and mountain geomorphology. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvacion A,R (2016) Terrain characterization of small island using publicly available data and open- source software: a case study of Marinduque, Philippines. Model. Earth Syst Environ 2:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0085-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagil S, Jenness J (2008)) GIS-Based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. Journal of Applied Sciences 8:910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen J, Verburg P, Sybesma M, Bouma J (1995) Terrain modelling as a basis for optimal agroecological land management using dynamic simulation. In: Robert PC (ed) Site-specific management for agricultural systems. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 229–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinod PG (2017) Development of topographic position index based on Jenness algorithm for precision agriculture at Kerala, India. Spat Inf Res 25:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0104-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss (2001) Topographic positions and landforms analysis (conference Poster). In: ESRI International user conference. San Diego, CA, pp. 9–13

  • Wilson JP (2012) Digital terrain modeling. In: Geospatial Technol Geomorphol Mapp Proc 41st Annu Binghamt Geomorphol Symp 137:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Dr. D. Padmalal, Scientist F and Head, Hydrological Processes, National Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram for the encouragement and support. Thanks are also due to Department of School of Environment Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), Kochi, Kerala, 682022, India

    Hema C. Nair & Ammini Joseph

  2. GeoVin Solutions (P) Ltd, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695010, India

    Vinod Padmakumari Gopinathan

Authors
  1. Hema C. Nair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ammini Joseph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinod Padmakumari Gopinathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hema C. Nair.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, H.C., Joseph, A. & Padmakumari Gopinathan, V. GIS Based landform classification using digital elevation model: a case study from two river basins of Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 4, 1355–1363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0490-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0490-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation