Scope and shape

Environmental Earth Sciences encompasses broad multidisciplinary fields in geoscientific research (Kolditz et al. 2018). The Editor’s met in fall 2019 in Leipzig, Germany to discuss the aims and scope of the journal in the context of new developments in the research field. The year 2019 was remarkable concerning the ”Climate Debate” in the public, science, and policy arenas. It is of utmost importance in the journal’s scope with a focus on solid earth and related environmental impacts. For papers focusing on climate-atmosphere-surface processes we recommend more specialized journals in order to boost the visibility of those works.

”Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with innovative approaches and significant aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources or unique geographic zones, with emphasis on the solid earth. In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific community is invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, natural resources management, environmental geography and soil science.” (Scope was revised at the Editor’s fall meeting 2019 in Leipzig.)

In addition to the Editors revising the aims and scope, Springer has established a new website for EES. Latest articles from the journal are highlighted with a key figure or photo allowing readers to easily grasp contents and to attract their interest (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A glimpse of the new EES website: https://www.springer.com/journal/12665

Most cited topics and papers

”Word clouds” used in the 2017 editorial will continue to be used here to keep the continuity. Even though this procedure might not be acknowledged as a rigorous scientific approach—it provides interesting insight into the most cited topics. Paper titles of the 50 most cited articles in different time periods were used over all years since publication of EES in 2009. Published under other names previously, the journal changed its name to Environmental Earth Sciences (EES) in 2009. The size of the words corresponds to their frequency in the paper titles.

Fig. 2
figure 2

”Wordle” of the 50 most cited papers from various time periods (using Wortwolken\(^{TM}\)) via http://www.wortwolken.com/

Figure 2 depicts temporal snapshots of word clouds: (a) from the current year 2019, (b) from a current impact factor relevant period and (c) over all years since publication of EES in 2009.

When inspecting the figures visually, we immediately notice that ”China” is the key country of investigations; groundwater and landslide related topics are important for all time periods. The term ”using” may stand for the application-oriented character of the journal; however we also observe a certain variety of highlighted key words:

  • 2019: In addition to the common key words, ”coal” and ”water” belong to the most used words in the current year.

  • 2017–2018: Two words are very prominent ”assessment” and ”susceptibility”. The first term emphasizes increasing environmental impact studies, the latter is related to the risk of slides.

  • 2009–2019: Taking all EES publication years into account ”landslide” ”GIS” ”mapping” ”CO2” belong to the most used words in paper titles. Geological CO2 sequestration (carbon capture and storage) was a major research area some time ago and will probably come back soon in the context of climate mitigation. Several topical collections have been dedicated to CCS in EES (Kharaka et al. 2010; Kühn et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2014; Senger et al. 2015).

As a part of the EES editorial synthesis, among the large number of excellent works, the most cited papers in 2019 starting from 2017 are highlighted here. This procedure corresponds to the calculation of a journal’s impact factor for 2019.Footnote 1 Please note, that the present editorial paper is not influencing the impact factor calculation and related self-citations as all 2019 papers are published already.

The Editors are pleased to award the most cited EES papers. Papers are listed in the references including the number of citations in the ”Web-of-Science” (WoS)Footnote 2 and in the SCOPUS data baseFootnote 3 (the citation count is as of 23.12.2019):

  1. 1.

    Shirzadi et al. (2017) (highly cited paper).

  2. 2.

    Lai et al. (2017) (highly cited paper).

  3. 3.

    Li et al. (2017) (highly cited paper).

  4. 4.

    Wu et al. (2017).

  5. 5.

    Hong et al. (2017).

  6. 6.

    Adimalla and Venkatayogi (2017).

  7. 7.

    Wollschläger et al. (2017).

  8. 8.

    Razavizadeh et al. (2017).

  9. 9.

    Wu et al. (2017).

  10. 10.

    Raheli et al. (2017).

  11. 11.

    Shirzadi et al. (2017).

  12. 12.

    Barzegar et al. (2017).

  13. 13.

    Okoli et al. (2017).

  14. 14.

    Pham et al. (2017).

  15. 15.

    Bloise et al. (2017).

The first three works belong to highly cited papers in the field of environmental sciencesFootnote 4 Of these, EES has a total of eleven highly cited papers in the field. Our congratulations go to these most cited papers, but also to all EES authors for their excellent contributions to the journal.

Progress report

In addition to the most cited paper awards, this editorial also provides more context of the journal’s development in the current year.

Impact factor development

Starting with the impact factor development since 2012, Figs. 3 and 4 depict these with and without self-citations, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

EES impact factor development (Source: Clarivate Analytics)

Fig. 4
figure 4

EES impact factor without self-citations (Source: Clarivate Analytics)

The impact factor varies between 1.435 and 1.871, with the highest IF 2018 (Fig. 3). For 2019, we expect for the first time an impact factor above 2. The impact factor without self-citations shows a continuous growth, which underlines the increasing awareness of EES publications also outside the journal itself. Self-citations in 2019 decreased to 978%, the overall self-citation percentage (over all years) is equal to 1628%; 601,829 EES articles were downloaded in 2018.

Authors’ contributions

In regard to authors’ contributions we look at publications by countries and by institutions from 2017 until now. Fig. 5 depicts the 25 most frequent citizenships of the corresponding authors. China is leading with 742 published items, followed by a second grouping of authors from India, Iran, USA, and Germany with more than 100 publications. The third group with a similar portion provides about 60% of published items. We also observe an increasing number of publications from Africa (Egypt, Nigeria) and Latin America (Argentina, Mexico).

Fig. 5
figure 5

EES publications by countries 2017–2019 (Source: Clarivate Analytics) (27-Greece, 28-Pakistan)

Fig. 6
figure 6

EES publications by affiliations 2017–2019 (Source: Clarivate Analytics)

According to the countries’ analysis (Fig. 6), Chinese institutions are leading the publications by affiliations record (Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) the largest research organization worldwide with its own university, China University of Mining and Technology, China University of Geosciences) etc., followed by the Indian Institute of Technology. Several national research institutions from Germany, Argentina, France, and Italy are strongly contributing to the journal which emphasizes the importance of EES for strategic research topics. A third group is formed by several universities from Iran (Teheran, Shiraz, Tabriz).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Submitted versus published items (Source: EES Editorial Manager)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Accepted versus rejected items (Source: EES Editorial Manager)

Submissions and publishing

EES has been smoothly transferred to continuous article publishing (CAP) in 2016 which has significantly accelerated the publication process. Currently it takes an average of 51 days from submission to first decision. Please note that these are average numbers, specific cases may take a different time particularly when reviewers are difficult to find. Missing reviewers’ attraction is also indicating that the particular manuscript may not fully fit into the scope of the journal. In such cases, implemented transfer option is used in order to avoid unacceptable review periods. The transfer desk is able to quickly offer more suited journals to the authors.

In 2018 the number of submissions exceeded 3000 for the first time which demonstrates the efforts for handling the journal. Figure 7 illustrates the increasing number of submissions and published articles in relation. Figure 8 shows the percentages of accepted versus rejected items (please note that manuscript transfers are not taken into account here).

Finally, the relation between published articles and citations is depicted in Fig. 9. This illustration underlines the increasing citation rate of EES articles (please note that this relation is not equivalent with the impact factor).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Citations versus published items (Source: Clarivate Analytics) [Status 09.02.2020], the number of citations for last year normally is still increasing until spring of the ongoing year

Topical collections

Topical collections have become a ”trademark” of the journal. They are strategic instruments to foster important and new research themes. Topical collections are open in general and readers are encouraged to participate in these structured publication projects. A complete list of topical collections including ongoing is as follows (number of contributions is given in brackets):

Topical collections 2018/2019 (sorted by published items, closed for submission)

  • Stone in architectural heritage (40)

  • Subsurface energy storage II (31)

  • Water in loess (24)

  • Environmental research of the three Gorges reservoir (21)

  • Climate effects on water resources (15)

  • NovCare—novel methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring: from theory to practice (14)

  • Engineering problems in Karst (13)

  • 4RAGSU (13)

  • Karst hydrogeology: advances in Karst collapse studies (11)

  • Learning from spatial data (11)

Fig. 10
figure 10

ANGUS topical collection on subsurface energy storage (edited by Sebastian Bauer, Andreas Dahmke)

Open topical collections (alphabetically)

  • Characterization, modeling, and remediation of Karst in a changing environment (Zexuan Xu, Nicolas Massei, Ingrid Padilla, Andrew Hartmann and Bill Hu)

  • Impacts of global change in groundwater in Western Mediterranean countries (Maria Luisa Calvache, Carlos Duque and David Pulido-Velazquez)

  • Groundwater resources and sustainability (Nam C. Woo, Xiaosi Su, Kangjoo Kim and Yu-Chul Park)

  • Groundwater resources in a changing environment (Okke Batelaan, Fabien Magri and Martin Sauter)

  • Mineral and thermal waters (Adam Porowski, Nina Rman and Istvan Forizs)

  • NovCare—novel methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring: from theory to practice (Uta Sauer and Peter Dietrich)

  • Sustainable management of Karst natural resources (Sasa Malinovic and Zoran Stevanovic)

  • Sustainable utilization of geosystems (Ulf Hünken, Peter Dietrich, Olaf Kolditz)

  • Visual data exploration (Karsten Rink, Roxana Bujack, Stefan Jänicke, and Dirk Zeckzer)

  • Water sustainability: a spectrum of innovative technology and remediation methods (Derek Kim, Kwang-Ho Choo, Jeonghwan Kim)

  • Water in large basins (Peiyue Li and Jianhua Wu)

Contributions to topical collections belong to the most cited EES papers. A more detailed analysis is provided in Fig. 10 for the thematic issue on ”Subsurface Energy Storage”. The yellow line represents a cumulative impact factor of EES (i.e. summing up IFs from 2016 to 2018). The blue line indicates the contribution of the topical collection to the impact factor, i.e. mean value of citations of all related papers for the same period.

The list of open topical collections can be found at: https://www.springer.com/journal/12665/updates/17856126.