Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling runoff–sediment response to land use/land cover changes using integrated GIS and SWAT model in the Beressa watershed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use/land cover (LU/LC) change has significant influence on runoff and sediment characteristics of any catchment. LU/LC change studies are essential for policy planners to understand the problems and take course of action such as soil and water conservation measures for improvement. The present study is conducted for Beressa watershed using hydrological model integrated with GIS. Input data like LU/LC, weather and soil data features are required to undertake watershed simulation. The model has been calibrated and validated in SWAT-CUP. The data from 1980 to 1999 were used for calibration, while the data from 2000 to 2014 were used for validation. LU/LC analysis showed that agricultural and settlement areas have increased between 1984 and 2015, while barren, grazing land and forest area have decreased. However, the share of forest cover increased in between 1999 and 2015. SWAT model has successfully simulated and calibrated runoff and sediment yield. During calibration periods (1980–1999), the values of R 2, NSE, RSR and PBIAS were obtained as 0.72, 0.67, 0.52 and 3.9%, respectively, whereas during the validation periods (2000–2014) the values were 0.68, 0.64, 0.56 and 7.6%, respectively. Runoff and sediment yield has significantly increased. Thus, it is concluded that the change in LU/LC significantly influenced the runoff and sediment yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas T, Nabi G, Boota MW, Hussain F, Faisal M, Ahsan H (2015) Impacts of land use changes on runoff generation in simly watershed. Sci Int 27(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC (2015) SWAT-calibration and uncertainty programs. A user manual. Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, p 103

    Google Scholar 

  • Adimassu Z, Mekonnen K, Yirga C, Kessler A (2014) Effect of soil bunds on runoff, soil and nutrient losses, and crop yield in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 25(6):554–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19(3):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asbjornsen H, Goldsmith GR, Alvarado-Barrientos MS, Rebel K, Van Osch FP, Rietkerk M, Chen J, Gotsch S, Tobon C, Geissert DR, Gomez-Tagle A (2011) Eco hydrological advances and applications in plant–water relations research: a review. J Plant Ecol 4(1–2):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aw A, Soom M, Amin M, Ghazali AH, Shafri M, Zulhaidi H, Mohammed TA, Mahmood WA, Wayayok A, Mohd Husin E (2009) The effect of development and land use change on rainfall-runoff and runoff-sediment relationships under humid tropical condition: case study of Bernam watershed Malaysia. Eur J Sci Res 31(1):88–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Biratu AA, Asmamaw DK (2016) Farmers’ perception of soil erosion and participation in soil and water conservation activities in the Gusha Temela watershed, Arsi, Ethiopia. Int J River Basin Manag 14:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB (1991) Urbanization and the natural drainage system–impacts, solutions, and prognoses. Northwest Environ J 7(1):93–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstert A, Niehoff D, Bürger G (2002) Effects of climate and land-use change on storm runoff generation: present knowledge and modelling capabilities. Hydrol Process 16(2):509–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chekol AD (2006) Modelling of hydrology and soil erosion of upper Awash river basin, Ethiopia. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. Thesis, University Bonn, p 235

  • Du J, Rui H, Zuo T, Li Q, Zheng D, Chen A, Xu Y, Xu CY (2013) Hydrological simulation by SWAT model with fixed and varied parameterization approaches under land use change. Water Resour Manag 27(8):2823–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt K, Breuer L, Frede HG (2003) Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects. J Hydrol 273(1):164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K, Frede HG (2001) Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Phys Chem Earth Part B 26(7):577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1211–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getachew HE, Melesse AM (2012) The impact of land use change on the hydrology of the Angereb watershed, Ethiopia. Int J Water Sci 1(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2010) SWAT-simulated hydrological impact of land-use change in the Zanjanrood Basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrol Process 24(7):892–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrol Eng 4(2):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp S, Fohrer N, Frede HG (2005) Assessment of the effect of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS-based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation. Hydrol Process 19(3):715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelmans G, Muys B, Feyen J (2004) Evaluation of hydrological model parameter transferability for simulating the impact of land use on catchment hydrology. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 29(11):739–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörmann G, Horn A, Fohrer N (2005) The evaluation of land-use options in mesoscale catchments: prospects and limitations of eco-hydrological models. Ecol Model 187(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan N, White SM, Worrall F, Whelan MJ (2007) Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT-2000. J Hydrol 332(3):456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner WG, Semmens DJ, Bassett SD, Mouat DA, Goodrich DC (2004) Scenario analysis for the San Pedro River, analyzing hydrological consequences of a future environment. Environ Monit Assess 94(1):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khare D, Patra D, Mondal A, Kundu S (2015) Impact of landuse/land cover change on run-off in a catchment of Narmada river in India. Appl Geom 7(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khare D, Patra D, Mondal A, Kundu S (2017) Impact of landuse/land cover change on run-off in the catchment of a hydro power project. Appl Water Sci 7(2):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydro climatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu G, Wang J, Li Q, Zhao J, Yu M, Cai T, Bai X, Xie W (2012) Impacts of Danjiangkou reservoir on sediment regime of the Hanjiang River. Hydrol Res 43(1–2):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbonimpa EG, Yuan Y, Mehaffey MH, Jackson MA (2012) SWAT model application to assess the impact of intensive corn-farming on runoff, sediments and phosphorous loss from an agricultural watershed in Wisconsin. J Water Resour prot 4(07):423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengistie D, Kidane D (2016) Assessment of the impact of small-scale irrigation on household livelihood improvement at Gubalafto District, North Wollo, Ethiopia. Agriculture 6(3):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshesha TW, Tripathi SK, Khare D (2016) Analyses of land use and land cover change dynamics using GIS and remote sensing during 1984 and 2015 in the Beressa Watershed Northern Central Highland of Ethiopia. Modell Earth Syst Environ 2(4):168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Kar S, Singh VP (2007) Prioritizing structural management by quantifying the effect of land use and land cover on watershed runoff and sediment yield. Water Resour Manag 21(11):1899–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2001) Soil and water assessment tool—version 2000—user’s manual. Springer, Temple

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo TS, Nguyen DB, Rajendra PS (2015) Effect of land use change on runoff and sediment yield in Da River Basin of Hoa Binh province, Northwest Vietnam. J Mt Sci 12(4):1051–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie W, Yuan Y, Kepner W, Nash MS, Jackson M, Erickson C (2011) Assessing impacts of Landuse and Landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. J Hydrol 407(1):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeurng C, Sauvage S, Sánchez-Pérez JM (2011) Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. J Hydrol 401(3):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajikumar N, Remya RS (2015) Impact of land cover and land use change on runoff characteristics. J Environ Manag 161:460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh A, Arnold JG, Gassman PWA, Hauck LM, Rosenthal WD, Williams JR, McFarland AMS (2000) Application of SWAT for the upper North Bosque River watershed. Trans ASAE 43(5):1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the swat model on a large RWER basin with point and nonpoint sources. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setegn SG, Srinivasan R, Melesse AM, Dargahi B (2010) SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 24(3):357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi PJ, Yuan Y, Zheng J, Wang JA, Ge Y, Qiu GY (2007) The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, China. Catena 69(1):31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Knapp HV, Arnold JG, Demissie M (2005) Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(2):343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song X, Duan Z, Kono Y, Wang M (2011) Integration of remotely sensed C factor into SWAT for modelling sediment yield. Hydrol Process 25(22):3387–3398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfaye G, Assefa A, Kidane D (2017) Runoff, sediment load and land use/cover change relationship: the case of Maybar sub-watershed, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Int J River Basin Manag 15(1):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Soil Conservation Service (1972) SCS national engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. The Service

  • Van Griensven A, Meixner T (2006) Methods to quantify and identify the sources of uncertainty for river basin water quality models. Water Sci Technol 53(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Liew MW, Veith TL, Bosch DD, Arnold JG (2007) Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 12(2):173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Yang H, Wang L, Xu Z, Xue B (2014) Using the SWAT model to assess impacts of land use changes on runoff generation in headwaters. Hydrol Process 28(3):1032–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold J (2007) ArcSWAT interface for SWAT2005 user’s guide. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and United States Department of Agriculture, Temple, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Worku T, Tripathi SK, Khare D (2017) Household level tree planting and its implication for environmental conservation in the Beressa Watershed of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res 6(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan C, Xu Z, Ye A, Su H (2011) LUCC and its impact on run-off yield in the Bai River catchment—upstream of the Miyun reservoir basin. J Plant Ecol 4(1–2):61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, Wang B, Bao Z, Zheng H (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa River Basin, Northeast China. Water Resour Manag 26(8):2199–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Ministry of education, Government of Ethiopia; many thanks go to them. We acknowledge India Institute of Technology, Roorkee, and Department of Water Resource Development and Management for making things comfortable. Sincere thanks are also extended to all who took part for the manuscript. For the insightful comments, special thank are extended for editors and anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tesfa Worku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Worku, T., Khare, D. & Tripathi, S.K. Modeling runoff–sediment response to land use/land cover changes using integrated GIS and SWAT model in the Beressa watershed. Environ Earth Sci 76, 550 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6883-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6883-3

Keywords

Navigation