Abstract
Land use and land cover (LULC) change within a watershed is recognized as an important factor affecting hydrological processes and water resources. Modeling the hydrological effects of land-use change is important not only for after-the-fact analyses, but also for understanding and predicting the potential hydrological consequences of existing land-use practices. The main aim of the study is to understand and quantify the hydrological processes in a rapid urbanization region. The SWAT model and the Qinhuai River basin, one of the most rapidly urbanizing regions in China were selected to perform the study. In the study, a varied parameterization strategy was developed by establishing regression equations with selected SWAT parameters as dependent variables and catchment impermeable area as independent variable. The performance of the newly developed varied parameterization approach was compared with the conventional fixed parameterization approach in simulating the hydrological processes under LULC changes. The results showed that the model simulation with varied parameterization approach has a large improvement over the conventional fixed parameterization approach in terms of both long-term water balance and flood events simulations. The proposed modeling approach could provide an essential reference for the study of assessing the impact of LULC changes on hydrology in other regions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19:563–572
Arnold JG, Muttiah RS, Srinivasan R, Allen PM (2000) Regional Estimation of Base Flow and Groundwater Recharge in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. J Hydrol 227:21–40
Bathurst JC, Ewen J, Parkin G, O’Connell PE, Cooper JD (2004) Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 3. Blind validation for internal and outlet responses. J Hydrol 287:74–94
Beven K (1993) Prophecy, reality, and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv Water Resour 16(1):41–51
Bulygina N, McIntyre N, Wheater H (2013) A comparison of rainfall-runoff modelling approaches for estimating impacts of rural land management on flood flows. Hydrol Res. doi:10.2166/nh.2013.034
Cao W, Bowden WB, Davie T, Fenemor A (2009) Modelling impacts of land cover change on critical water resources in the Motueka River Catchment, New Zealand. Water Resour Manag 23:137–151
Choi JY, Engel B, Muthukrishnan S, Harbor J (2003) GIS based long term hydrologic impact evaluation for watershed urbanization. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(3):623–635
Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede HG (2005) Automatic model calibration. Hydrol Processes 19:651–658
Franczyk J, Chang H (2009) The effects of climate change and urbanization on the runoff of the Rock Creek basin in the Portland metropolitan area, Oregon, USA. Hydrol Process 23:805–815
Guo H, Hu Q, Jiang T (2008) Annual and seasonal streamflow responses to climate and land-cover changes in the Poyang Lake basin, China. J Hydrol 355:106–122
Im SJ, Kim H, Kim C, Jang C (2009) Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE. Environ Geol 57:231–239
Jiang S, Ren L, Yong B, Fu CB, Yang XL (2012) Analyzing the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff from the Laohahe basin in northern China. Hydrol Res 43(1–2):3–13
Kaini P, Kim A, Nicklow JW (2012) Optimizing structural best management practices using SWAT and genetic algorithm to improve water quality goals. Water Resour Manage 26:1827–1845
Karvonen T, Koivusalo H, Jauhiainen M (1999) A hydrological model for predicting runoff from different land use areas. J Hydrol 217:253–265
Krysanova V, Hattermann F, Wechsung F (2005) Development of the ecohydrological model SWIM for regional impact studies and vulnerability assessment. Hydrol Process 19:763–783
Li K, Coe MT, Ramankutty N, Jong RD (2007) Modeling the hydrological impact of land-use change in West Africa. J Hydrol 337:258–268
Li M, Ma Z, Du J (2010) Regional soil moisture simulation for Shaanxi Province using SWAT model validation and trend analysis. Sci China Earth Sci 53:575–590
Li Z, Liu W, Zhang X, Zheng F (2009) Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. J Hydrol 377:35–42
Lin Y, Verburgb PH, Changc CR, Chena HY, Chena MH (2009) Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in Taiwan. Landscape Urban Plan 92:242–254
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JE (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290
Neitsch SL, Arnold JC, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation. Version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and water assessment tool: Theoretical documentation, version 2005. Grassland and Water Research Laboratory and Blackland Research Center, Temple, TX
Palamuleni LG, Ndomba PM, Annegarn HJ (2011) Evaluating land cover change and its impact on hydrological regime in Upper Shire river catchment, Malawi. Reg Environ Change 11:845–855
Pisinaras V, Petalas C, Gikas GD, Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA (2010) Hydrological and water quality modeling in a medium-sized basin using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Desalination 250:274–286
Ren L, Liu X, Yuan F, Xu J, Liu W (2012) Quantitative analysis of runoff reduction in the Laohahe basin. Hydrol Res 43(1–2):38–47
Schulze RE (2000) Modelling hydrological responses to land use and climate change: a Southern African perspective. AMBIO J Human Environ 29:12–22
Stehr A, Debels P, Romero F, Alcayaga H (2008) Hydrological modelling with SWAT under conditions of limited data availability: evaluation of results from a Chilean case study. Hydrol Sci J 53(3):588–601
Stohlgren TJ, Chase TN, Pielke RA, Kittel TGF, Baron J (1998) Evidence that local land use practices influence regional climate, vegetation, and stream flow patterns in adjacent natural areas. Global Change Biol 4:495–504
Tuppad P, Kannan N, Srinivasan R, Rossi CG, Arnold JG (2010) Simulation of agricultural management alternatives for watershed protection. Water Resour Manage 24:3115–3144
Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Sirinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23
Wang MN, Qin DY, Lu CY, Li YP (2010) Modeling anthropogenic impacts and hydrological processes on a wetland in China. Water Resour Manage 24:2743–2757
Yang X, Ren LL, Singh VP, Liu X, Yuan F, Jiang S, Yong B (2012) Impacts of land use and land cover changes on evapotranspiration and runoff at Shalamulun River watershed, China. Hydrol Res 43(1–2):23–37
Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, Wang B, Bao Z, Zheng H (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa river basin, northeast China. Water Resour Manage 26:2199–2217
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40730635) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. The corresponding author was also supported by the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities—the 111 Project of Hohai University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, J., Rui, H., Zuo, T. et al. Hydrological Simulation by SWAT Model with Fixed and Varied Parameterization Approaches Under Land Use Change. Water Resour Manage 27, 2823–2838 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0317-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0317-0