Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in ecological flow regimes and their response to dams in the upper Yellow River basin

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The upper Yellow River basin is located in the new Silk Road economic belt. Fundamental to the healthy development of the Yellow River ecosystem and the security of water resources in the economic belt are the hydrological regime change that drives river ecosystem processes, or called ecological flow regimes (EFR). When developing a sustainable and ecofriendly Silk Road economic belt, the evaluation of the alteration of the EFR and an attribute analysis should receive great attention because they can provide decision makers with more information on ecological implications for balancing environmental and human water needs. The objective of this paper is to investigate the EFR variation at the Lanzhou gauge as the control section of the upper Yellow River basin. First, the paper addresses the macroscale EFR using ecoflow metrics (ecodeficit and ecosurplus), i.e., the multi-year trend of the annual and seasonal changes in ecological flow. Second, it evaluates microscale variations in EFR via the Yellow River ecohydrological index system and compares them with macroscale changes in EFR to verify their consistency. Third, it analyzes the attributes of EFR variation and determines the impact of the construction and operation of reservoirs on the variation. Results show that macro- and microscale EFR at the Lanzhou gauge have significant changes before and after the construction of reservoirs in the upper Yellow River basin, reaching a high degree of alteration. Reservoir construction and operation have been the major reason for the alteration of EFR in the past few decades, and the cascade reservoir regulation has more significantly affected the changes in EFR than has a single reservoir, placing the downstream fluvial ecological system under serious risk. This change should arouse considerable concern, particularly in the development of the new Silk Road economic belt. In addition, ecoflow metrics used for reflecting the macroscale change in this study are highly correlated with microscale indicators of EFR that are accepted in the upper Yellow River basin. This result implies that ecoflow metrics can mirror most ecological information from these microscale indicators and are suitable for the evaluation of alterations in hydrological processes at annual and seasonal timescales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Aziz OI, Burn DH (2006) Trends and variability in the hydrological regime of the Mackenzie River Basin. J Hydrol 319(1):282–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black AR, Rowan JS, Duck RW, Bragg OM, Clelland BE (2005) DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15(5):427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30(4):492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn DH, Hag Elnur MA (2002) Detection of hydrologic trends and variability. J Hydrol 255(1):107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui B, Tang N, Zhao X, Bai J (2009) A management-oriented valuation method to determine ecological water requirement for wetlands in the Yellow River Delta of China. J Nat Conserv 17(3):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Vogel RM, Kroll CN, Poff NL, Olden JD (2009) Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. J Hydrol 374(1):136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao B, Yang D, Zhao T, Yang H (2012) Changes in the eco-flow metrics of the Upper Yangtze River from 1961 to 2008. J Hydrol 448:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed KH (2009) Enhancing the effectiveness of prewhitening in trend analysis of hydrologic data. J Hydrol 368(1):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CP, Brasher AMD, May JT (2008) Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States. Freshw Biol 53(10):1983–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LJ, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang J, Yang JW, Jiang DJ, Li JY, Qin DY (2007) Assessing the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow from the Wuding River basin in China. Hydrol Process 21(25):3485–3491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Howard KWF, Wu J, Lyu X (2014a) Anthropogenic pollution and variability of manganese in alluvial sediments of the Yellow River, Ningxia, northwest China. Environ Monit Assess 186(3):1385–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2014b) Accelerate research on land creation. Nature 510(7503):29–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Howard KW, Wu J (2015a) Building a new and sustainable “Silk Road economic belt”. Environ Earth Sci 74(10):7267–7270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Howard KWF, Wu J (2015b) Heavy metal contamination of Yellow River alluvial sediments, northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3403–3415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chang J, Tu H, Wang X (2015c) Impact of the Sanmenxia and Xiaolangdi reservoirs operation on the hydrologic regime of the lower Yellow River. J Hydrol Eng 21(3):06015015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Zheng H (2004) Changes in components of the hydrological cycle in the Yellow River basin during the second half of the 20th century. Hydrol Process 18(12):2337–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma ZZ, Wang ZJ, Xia T, Gippel CJ, Speed R (2014) Hydrograph-based hydrologic alteration assessment and its application to the Yellow River. J Environ Inf 23(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain ME, Subalusky AL, Anderson EP, Dessu SB, Melesse AM, Ndomba PM, Mtamba JOD, Tamatamah RA, Mligo C (2014) Comparing flow regime, channel hydraulics, and biological communities to infer flow–ecology relationships in the Mara River of Kenya and Tanzania. Hydrol Sci J 59(3–4):801–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao C, Ni J, Borthwick A (2010) Recent changes of water discharge and sediment load in the Yellow River basin China. Prog Phys Geogr 34(4):541–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes JM, Pellegrino GQ, Ballester MV, Martinelli LA, Victoria RL, Krusche AV (1998) Trends in hydrological parameters of a southern Brazilian watershed and its relation to human induced changes. Water Resour Manag 12(4):295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308(5720):405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Poff NL (2003) Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Res Appl 19(2):101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ (2012) A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology. Ecohydrology 5(4):503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang W, Hao F, Song K, Zhang X (2011) Cascade dam-induced hydrological disturbance and environmental impact in the upper stream of the Yellow River. Water Resour Manag 25(3):913–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55(1):194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Olden JD, Merritt DM, Pepin DM (2007) Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(14):5732–5737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10(4):1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter B, Baumgartner J, Wigington R, Braun D (1997) How much water does a river need. Freshw Biol 37(1):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Braun DP, Powell J (1998) A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. River Res Appl 14(4):329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Wu FC (2007) Pareto-optimal solutions for environmental flow schemes incorporating the intra-annual and interannual variability of the natural flow regime. Water Resour Res 43:W06433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyers R (1975) Sur l'analyse statistique des séries d'observations. Tech Note 143, WMO, Geneva, pp 9–12

  • Su S, Li D, Yu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Xiao R, Zhi J, Wu J (2011) Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(6):737–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen JP (2011) Determining the ecological flow regime for existing reservoir operation. Water Resour Manag 25(3):817–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen JP, Eheart JW (2006) Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resour Res 42(3):W03417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Feng ML (2013) Multistage analysis of hydrologic alterations in the Yellow River China. River Res Appl 29(8):991–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Oki T, Kanae S, Hu H (2008) Hydrological cycles change in the Yellow River basin during the last half of the twentieth century. J Clim 21(8):1790–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (2006) Indicators of hydrologic alteration version 7 user’s manual. http://www.nature.org/initiatives/freshwater/files/ihav7.pdf

  • Tsai WP, Chang FJ, Herricks EE (2016) Exploring the ecological response of fish to flow regime by soft computing techniques. Ecol Eng 87:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel RM, Sieber J, Archfield SA, Smith MP, Apse CD, Huber-Lee A (2007) Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow[J]. Water Resour Res 43:W05403

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Yang Z, Saito Y, Liu JP, Sun X, Wang Y (2007) Stepwise decreases of the Huanghe (Yellow River) sediment load (1950–2005): impacts of climate change and human activities. Glob Planet Chang 57(3):331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hong Y, Gourley J, Adhikari P, Li L, Su F (2010) Quantitative assessment of climate change and human impacts on long-term hydrologic response: a case study in a sub-basin of the Yellow River China. Int J Climatol 30(14):2130–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Qian H, Li P, Song Y (2014) A system-theory-based model for monthly river runoff forecasting: model calibration and optimization. J Hydrol Hydromech 62(1):82–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Suen JP, Herricks EE, Eheart JW (2004) Ecohydrologic indicators for rivers of northern Taiwan. In: Critical transitions in water and environmental resources management, pp 1–9. doi:10.1061/40737(2004)143

  • Yang D, Li C, Hu H, Lei Z, Yang S, Kusuda T, Koike T, Musiake K (2004) Analysis of water resources variability in the Yellow River of China during the last half century using historical data. Water Resour Res 40:W06502

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Zhang Q, Chen YD, Tao X, Xu CY, Chen X (2008) A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration caused by dam construction in the middle and lower Yellow River. China. Hydrol Process 22(18):3829–3843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin XA, Yang ZF, Petts GE (2015) A new method to assess the flow regime alterations in riverine ecosystems. River Res Appl 31(4):497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16(9):1807–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Sun P, Jiang T, Tu X, Chen X (2011) Spatio-temporal patterns of hydrological processes and their responses to human activities in the Poyang Lake basin China. Hydrol Sci J 56(2):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HB, Huang Q, Peng SM, Zhang SH (2012) An eco-hydrologic index system and its application on the Yellow River. Shuili Xuebao (J Hydraul Eng) 43(6):675–683 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Gu X, Singh VP, Chen X (2015) Evaluation of ecological instream flow using multiple ecological indicators with consideration of hydrological alterations. J Hydrol 529:711–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51379014), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No.: 2014KJXX-54), and the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang’an University (Grant No.: 310829152018). Our cordial thanks should be extended to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their pertinent and professional suggestions and comments which are greatly helpful for further improvement of the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbo Zhang.

Additional information

This article is a part of a Topical Collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on “Advances of Research in Soil, Water, Environment, and Geologic Hazards Along the Silk Road” guest edited by Drs. Peiyue Li, Hui Qian and Wanfang Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Singh, V.P., Zhang, Q. et al. Variation in ecological flow regimes and their response to dams in the upper Yellow River basin. Environ Earth Sci 75, 938 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5751-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5751-x

Keywords

Navigation