Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative evaluation of arsenate sorption–desorption in two soils of North India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sandy loam (Typic Ustochrept) and a clayey (Typic Hapludalf) soil from two north Indian states, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, respectively, were used to study sorption–desorption behaviour of arsenate. Arsenate sorption by the soils was studied from a range of added concentrations (50–100 mg arsenate kg−1) in the presence of background electrolyte, 0.01 M KNO3. Arsenate sorption was found to increase with each increment in added arsenate concentration in both the soils. However, the magnitude of sorbed arsenate decreased. The sorption was rapid initially followed by gradual retention behaviour. The amount and pattern of arsenate sorbed over a period of time (2–512 h) differed between the two soils. The sorption was higher and quicker by clayey soil as compared to sandy loam soil, which could be due to difference in their pH, AEC, organic matter, Fe and Mn oxide content. Arsenate sorption data were well explained by Langmuir and Freundlich sorption isotherms. Desorption of arsenate was carried out by six successive washings with arsenate free 0.01 M KNO3 solution. At all levels of added arsenate, most of the sorbed arsenate could not be desorbed back into the solution and a marked hysteresis between arsenate sorption and desorption isotherms was observed in both soils which became greater with increasing reaction period. Relatively lesser amount of arsenate could be desorbed back from clayey soil than from sandy loam soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arai Y, Sparks DL (2002) Residence time effects on arsenate surface speciation at the aluminium oxide-water interface. Soil Sci 167:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora S (2001) Kinetics of boron adsorption-desorption and its availability in major soil series of Punjab. M.Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India

  • Bandyopadhyay BK, Sarkar P, Sen HS, Sanyal SK (2004) Influence of soil properties on arsenic availability in soil. Indian Soc Soil Sci 52:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchter B, Davidoff B, Amacher C, Hinz C, Iskandar IK, Selim HM (1989) Correlation of Freundlich Kd and n retention parameters with soils and elements. Soil Sci 148:370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chein SWC, Chen SH, Geethangili M, Huang HB (2012) Adsorption characteristics of aqueous arsenic(iii) and arsenic(v) in Taiwan soils. Int J Appl Sci Eng 4:333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 545–567

    Google Scholar 

  • De Brouwere K, Smolders E, Merckx R (2004) Soil properties affecting solid-liquid distribution of As(V) in soils. Eur J Soil Sci 55:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Benedetto F, Costagliola P, Benvenuti M, Lattanzi P, Romanelli M, Tanelli G (2006) Arsenic incorporation in natural calcite lattice: evidence from electron spin echo spectroscopy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 246:458–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Shan XX, Wen B, Lin JM, Lu XC, Liu XD, Owens G (2008) Sorption and desorption of phenanthrene onto iron, copper and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 24:10929–10935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendorf S, La Force MJ, Li G (2004) Temporal changes in soil partitioning and bioaccessibility of arsenic, chromium and lead. J Environ Qual 3:2049–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Q, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Liu L, Zhang Z, Chen C (2013) Adsorption and desorption characteristics of arsenic on soils: kinetics, equilibrium and effect of Fe(OH)3 colloid, H2SiO3 colloid and phosphate. Procedia Environ Sci 18:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller CC, Davis JA, Waychunas GA (1993) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: part 2. Kinetics of arsenate adsorption and coprecipitation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:2271–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles CH, D’Silva AP, Easton IA (1974) A general treatment and classification of the solute adsorption isotherm. Part II. Experimental interpretation. J Colloid Interface Sci 47:766–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Johnston CTJ (2001) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. Colloid Interface Sci 234:204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong HJ, Farooq W, Yang JS, Yang JW (2010) Preparation and evaluation of Fe-Al binary oxide for arsenic removal: comparative study with single metal oxides. Sep Sci Tech 45:1975–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsia TH, Lo SL, Lee DY (1994) Characterisation of arsenate adsorption on hydrous iron oxides using chemical and physical methods. Colloids surfaces A. Physicochem Eng Aspects 85:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundal HS, Kumar R, Singh K, Singh D (2007) Occurrence and geochemistry of arsenic in groundwater of Punjab, northwest India. Commun Soil Sci Pl Anal 38:2257–2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundal HS, Singh K, Singh D (2009) Adsorption of arsenate on coarse loamy mixed hyperthermic fluventic soil of Punjab, north-west India. Commun Soil Sci Pl Anal 40:3015–3022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Zhang S, Shan X, Feng M, Zhu YG, Mclaren RG (2005) Adsorption of arsenate on soils. Part 1: laboratory batch experiments using 16 Chinese soils with different physiochemical properties. Environ Pollut 138:285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji SK, Pal A, Pal T, Adak A (2007) Adsorption thermodynamics of arsenic in laterite soils. J Surf Sci Tech 22:161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal SK, Majumder N, Chowdhury C, Ganguly D, Dey M, Jana TK (2012) Adsorption kinetic control of As(III and V) mobilization and sequestration by Mangrove sediment. Environ Earth Sci 65:2027–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Goldberg S (1996) Modelling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 33:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean E O (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison

  • Meharg AA, Naylor J, Macnair MR (1994) Phosphorus nutrition of arsenate-tolerant and non tolerant phenotypes of velvetgrass. J Environ Qual 23:234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly SE, Strawn DG, Sparks DL (2001) Residence time effects on arsenate adsorption/desorption mechanisms on goethite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis. Mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. Springer, Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigna M, Krishnamurti GSR, Violante A (2006) Kinetics of arsenate sorption-dessoprtion from metal oxides: effect of residence time. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:2017–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven KP, Jain A, Loeppert RH (1998) Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ Sci Technol 32:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman-Ross G, Cuello GJ, Turrillas X, Fernandez-Martinez A, Charlet L (2006) Arsenite sorption and co-precipitation with calcite. Chem Geol 233:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saada A, Breeze D, Crouzet C, Cornu S, Baranger P (2003) Adsorption of arsenic(V) on kaolinite-humic acid complexes role of humic acid nitrogen groups. Chemosphere 51:757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2006) Mobility of arsenic in saturated, laboratory test sediments under varying pH conditions. Eng Geol 85:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman LM (1982) Separating soil iron- and manganese-oxide fractions for micronutrient analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1099–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skopp J (1986) Analysis of time-dependent chemical processes in soils. J Environ Qual 15:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Naidu R, Alston AM (1998) Arsenic in the soil environment: a review. Adv Agron 64:149–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Naidu R, Alston AM (1999) Chemistry of arsenic in soils: I. Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by selected soils. J Environ Qual 28:1719–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syers JK, Browman MG, Smillie GW, Corey RB (1973) Phosphate sorption by soils evaluated by Langmuir adsorption equation. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Effect of natural organic matter on arsenic release from soils and sediments into groundwater. Environ Geochem Hlth 28:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waychunas GA, Rea BA, Fuller CC, Davis JA (1993) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: part 1. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:2251–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Selim HM (2005) Kinetics of arsenate adsorption-desorption in soils. Environ Sci Tech 39:6101–6108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanwinder Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The research work was carried out by the first author for her M.Sc (Soil Science) programme at Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The second and third authors are supervisor and co-supervisor, respectively. It is stated that the manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full). A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time. No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. No data, text or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works have been given. It is stated that no external funding/grant was received for this research work. Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

It is stated that no human participants and/or animals were involved in this research work.

Informed consent

Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors. The permission of Head, Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, where the work has been carried out, has been granted for publication of this research work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sondal, J., Singh, D. & Sikka, R. Comparative evaluation of arsenate sorption–desorption in two soils of North India. Environ Earth Sci 75, 249 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5018-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5018-y

Keywords

Navigation