Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of moving bed biofilm reactor and traditional membrane bioreactor (MBR) shows great potential to be widely used in Liaohe River basin for wastewater treatment. The aim of this research is to compare the bioreactor performance and membrane fouling between integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactor (IFAS–MBR) and MBR. Two lab-scale reactors were operated in parallel to treat synthetic municipal wastewater with continuous operation. The results indicated that both systems had the same high removal efficiency of ammonium, while the IFAS–MBR showed a higher ability to remove COD. The trans-membrane pressure in the MBR was higher than that in the IFAS–MBR during the entire operation, due to a higher total modified fouling index of the mixed liquor and the resultant higher membrane fouling potential. The concentrations of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products were higher in MBR, despite the functional groups were almost similar in two reactors. The conventional MBR had more small molecular weight components (<1 kDa) and soluble microbial metabolites. This seems to cause pore blocking, which directly results in membrane flux declining and membrane resistance rising in the MBR system. In addition, the MBR was characterized by a serious membrane fouling as more dense deposits were observed by scanning electron microscopy. On the contrary, the IFAS–MBR showed a lower membrane fouling tendency during the whole operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MBR:

Membrane bioreactor

IFAS–MBR:

Integrated fixed-film activated sludge membrane bioreactor

TEPS:

Total extracellular polymeric substances

EPS:

Extracellular polymeric substances

SMP:

Soluble microbial products

MFI:

Modified fouling index

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

MW:

Molecular weight

EEM:

Excitation–emission matrix

TMP:

Trans-membrane pressure

R :

Total filtration resistance

R m :

Intrinsic membrane resistance

R f :

Internal fouling resistance

R c :

Cake layer resistance

References

  • An Y, Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Yang DH, Zhou Q (2009) Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 155:709–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BK, Mandal SM, Bhattacharya J (2012) Understanding of the biochemical events in a chemo-bioreactor during continuous acid mine drainage treatment. Environ Earth Sci 66:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Torre T, Rodriguez C, Gomez MA, Alonso E, Malfeito JJ (2013) The IFAS–MBR process: a compact combination of biofilm and MBR technology as RO pretreatment. Desalin Water Treat 51:1063–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Trapani D, Di Bella G, Mannina G, Torregrossa M, Viviani G (2014) Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: influence of wastewater salinity variation. Bioresource Technol 162:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drews A (2010) Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J Membr Sci 363:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan L, Jiang W, Song Y, Xia S, Hermanowicz SW (2013) The characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 148:436–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng SJ, Zhang X, Cao BY (2014) Leachate recirculation in bioreactor landfills considering the effect of MSW settlement on hydraulic properties. Environ Earth Sci 72:2315–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolund B, Palmgren R, Keiding K, Nielsen PH (1996) Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res 30:1749–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal Khan S, Ilyas S, Javid S, Visvanathan C, Jegatheesan V (2011) Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater. Bioresour Technol 102:5331–5336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IS, Jang N (2006) The effect of calcium on the membrane biofouling in the membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water Res 40:2756–2764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyva-Diaz JC, Martin-Pascual J, Munio MM, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Hontoria E, Poyatos JM (2014) Comparative kinetics of hybrid and pure moving bed reactor-membrane bioreactors. Ecol Eng 70:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyva-Díaz J, Martín-Pascual J, González-López J, Hontoria E, Poyatos J (2013) Effects of scale-up on a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor–membrane bioreactor for treating urban wastewater. Chem Eng Sci 104:808–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Liu C, Song LF (2007) Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Res 41:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CP, Zhou QY, Xue YW, Zhang YY, Li R, Liu JG (2013) Application of electrical resistivity tomography to evaluate the variation in moisture content of waste during 2 months of degradation. Environ Earth Sci 68:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma HZ, Allen HE, Yin YJ (2001) Characterization of isolated fractions of dissolved organic matter from natural waters and a wastewater effluent. Water Res 35:985–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud N, Zeeman G, Gijzen H, Lettinga G (2003) Solids removal in upflow anaerobic reactors, a review. Bioresour Technol 90:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng FG, Zhang HM, Yang FL, Liu LF (2007) Characterization of cake layer in submerged membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol 41:4065–4070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng FG, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang FL (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DL (1948) Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with dreywood’s anthrone reagent. Science (New York) 107:254–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu GL, Song YH, Zeng P, Duan L, Xiao SH (2013a) Characterization of bacterial communities in hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB)-membrane bioreactor (MBR) process for berberine antibiotic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 142:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu GL, Song YH, Zeng P, Duan L, Xiao SH (2013b) Combination of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for berberine reduction from wastewater and the effects of berberine on bacterial community dynamics. J Hazard Mater 246:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng GP, Yu HQ (2006) Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 40:1233–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza ES, Souza JVB, Silva FT, Paiva TCB (2014) Treatment of an ECF bleaching effluent with white-rot fungi in an air-lift bioreactor. Environ Earth Sci 72:1289–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CYY, Chong TH, Fane AG (2011) Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv Colloid Interfac 164:126–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Tang SJ (2009) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 43:2504–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZW, Mei XJ, Wu ZC, Ye SF, Yang DH (2012) Effects of biopolymer discharge from MBR mixture on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling. Chem Eng J 193:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Wang F, Hong Q, Zhang YP, Kengara FO, Li ZB, Jiang X (2013) Isolation and characterization of a toxic metal-tolerant Phenanthrene-degrader Sphingobium sp in a two-liquid-phase partitioning bioreactor (TPPB). Environ Earth Sci 70:1765–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Yang FL, Fu ZM, Lei RB (2009) Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 100:2369–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HF (2009) Impact of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances on filtration resistance in a membrane bioreactor. Environ Eng Sci 26:1115–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Foundation of Key Laboratory of Contaminated Environment Control and Regional Ecology Safety (SYU-KF-L-04), Foundation of Key Laboratory of Regional Environment Eco-remediation, Education Ministry (SYU-KF-E-04), Foundation of State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control (SMARC. 2013D005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51108437, 21306180), Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research Business of Central Public Research Institutes (2013YSKY11), and Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07202-004-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    Liang Duan, Shan Li, Lu Han, Yonghui Song & Jing Zhang

  2. Department of Urban Water Environmental Research, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Dayangfang 8, Anwai Beiyuan, Beijing, 100012, China

    Liang Duan, Lu Han, Yonghui Song & Jing Zhang

  3. Civil and Environmental Engineering School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China

    Shan Li & Beihai Zhou

Authors
  1. Liang Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lu Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yonghui Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Beihai Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonghui Song.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, L., Li, S., Han, L. et al. Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor and conventional membrane bioreactor systems. Part I: membrane fouling. Environ Earth Sci 73, 4881–4890 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4159-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4159-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation