Skip to main content
Log in

Central venous pressure catheter for large-volume paracentesis in refractory ascites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

About 10 % of cirrhotic patients are unresponsive to sodium restriction and diuretics and develop refractory ascites. Such patients usually require recurrent large-volume paracentesis and lots of hospital admissions. Hereby, we introduce a method applying a central vein (CV) catheter for large-volume paracentesis in patients with refractory ascites in up to 4 days associated with sodium restriction and high dose of diuretics.

Methods

Non-tunneled triple lumen CV catheter was used to drain the ascites fluid of 30 cirrhotic patients. After precise percussion, the point of highest fluid accumulation was marked for puncture. Then, the skin and subcutaneous tissue were anesthetized. CV catheter set guide wire was entered into the peritoneal cavity and the dilator of the CV catheter set was passed through the guide wire and extracted after some rotations around its insertion site on the skin. The catheter was passed over the guide wire and the guide wire was extracted gradually from one of the lumens and fixed to the skin.

Results

Nineteen males and 11 females with mean (±SD) age of 59.4 ± 11.7 years old underwent the procedure. A minimum of 9 and maximum of 29 L (12 ± 6.6 L) ascites fluid drained during a minimum of 2 and maximum of 5 days of hospital stay. All catheters were patent during the drainage. None of the patients developed hemodynamic instability. Number of re-hospitalizations for paracentesis was 1.9 times during the following year. No complication occurred.

Conclusions

This technique is a simple noninvasive method that can be performed in the endoscopy unit or even at the patient’s bedside and may reduce the need for repeated admissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim WR, Brown JR, Terrault NA, et al. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of the workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36:227–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gines P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, et al. Compensated cirrhosis: natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1987;7:12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Powell WJ, Klatskin G. Duration of survival in patients with Laennec’s cirrhosis of the liver. Am J Med. 1968;44:406–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, et al. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:468–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llach J, Gines P, Arroyo V, et al. Prognostic value of arterial pressure, endogenous vasoconstrictive systems, and renal function in cirrhotic patients admitted to the hospital for the treatment of ascites. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:482–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah R (2012) Medical care. In: Ascites treatment and management. Available via http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/170907-treatment#showall.Accessed4Jan2012.

  7. Gerbes AL. Medical treatment of ascites in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1993;17 Suppl 2:S4–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore KP, Aithal GP. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut. 2006;55 Suppl 6:vi1–12.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Runyon BA. Care of patients with ascites. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:337–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Runyon BA. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, et al. eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010. Pp. 1517–41 (2) 9.

  11. Draganov PV, Senousy BE. Evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:67–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen M, Truong S, Reisener KP, et al. Results of sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses in surgery. Chirurg. 1999;70:1168–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg SM. Palliation of malignant ascites. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2006;35:189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reisfield GM, Wilson GR. Management of intractable cirrhotic ascites with an indwelling drainage catheter. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:787–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guevara M, Cardenas A, Uriz J, et al. Prognosis of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. In: Gines P, Arroyo V, Rodes J, Schrier RW, et al. eds. Ascites and Renal Dysfunction in Liver Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science; 2005. Pp. 260–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Runyon BA. AASLD practice guidelines committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:2087–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanyal AJ, Genning C, Reddy RK, et al. The North American study for the treatment of refractory ascites. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:634–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gines P, Uriz J, Calahorra B, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1839–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hussain FF, Meer ZF, Lopez AJ. Peritoneovenous shunt insertion for intractable ascites: a district general hospital experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004;27:325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JS, Won JY, Park SI, et al. Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt creation for the treatment of benign and malignant refractory ascites. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;12:1445–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE, Clark WC, et al. TIPS versus peritoneovenous shunt in the treatment of medically intractable ascites: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2004;239:883–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozenblit GN, Del Guercio LRM, Rundback JH, et al. Peritoneal-urinary drainage for treatment of refractory ascites: a pilot study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;9:998–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lorentzen T, Sengelov L, Nolsoe CP, et al. Ultrasonographically guided insertion of a peritoneo-gastric shunt in patients with malignant ascites. Acta Radiol. 1995;36:481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O'Neill MJ, Weissleder R, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Tunneled peritoneal catheter placement under sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in the palliative treatment of malignant ascites. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:615–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard HM, Coldwell DM, Boyd-Kranis RL, et al. Pleurx tunneled catheter in the management of malignant ascites. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;12:373–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sartori S, Nielsen I, Trevisani L, et al. Sonographically guided peritoneal catheter placement in the palliation of malignant ascites in end-stage malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1618–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barnett TD, Rubins J. Placemet of a permanent tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter for palliation of malignant ascites: a simplified percutaneous approach. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;13:379–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabatelli FW, Glassman ML, Kerns SR, et al. Permanent indwelling peritoneal access device for the management of malignant ascites. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994;17:292–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenblum DI, Geisinger MA, Newman JS, et al. Use of subcutaneous venous access ports to treat refractory ascites. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;12:1343–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

SA, ST, HN, MN, and AAl declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The authors declare that the study was performed in a manner to conform with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning Human and Animal Rights, and that the authors followed the policy concerning Informed Consent as shown on Springer.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahram Agah.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 65.5 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agah, S., Tavakoli, S., Nikbakht, H. et al. Central venous pressure catheter for large-volume paracentesis in refractory ascites. Indian J Gastroenterol 33, 310–315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-014-0448-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-014-0448-0

Keywords

Navigation