Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anthropometric Analysis of Indian Faces: A Systematic Review

  • REVIEW PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Facial anthropometric data vary significantly within the Indian population due to the racial, ethnic and geographic diversity. The anthropometric data of a given ethnic community may not match the other due to diverse ethnic variations, and hence, this study is intended to review the facial anthropometric data pertaining to the diverse Indian populace through a systematic literature survey.

Materials and Method

An electronic search done on Medline, Embase and Central databases was utilized to conduct a systematic review of literature. The available data were analyzed based on the various esthetic subunits of the face. The following inclusion criteria were considered: (1) studies depicting the anthropometric data of any ethnic group identified as belonging to India, (2) studies originating from Indian subcontinent, (3) studies which included data of male and female subjects separately and (4) articles in English language only. The following exclusion criteria were considered: (1) atudies conducted on participants with severe malocclusion, developmental craniofacial anomalies, post-traumatic facial deformities or with a history of previous craniofacial or cosmetic surgery, (2) studies which did not specify the anthropometric landmarks used to obtain the measurements, (3) studies in which the statistical analysis was not provided, or if data were grouped across genders and (4) editorials, commentaries, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and articles not available in English language.

Results

Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Majority of the Indians, particularly men, seem to have a mesoproscopic facial phenotype. The vertical and horizontal facial dimensions of the Indian male are comparably larger than the Indian female. There is sexual dimorphism among the Indian population with regard to the upper and lower thirds of the face, with little or no gender difference as regards the middle third of the face. It was observed that the nasal dimensions of the Indian race were not compatible with that of the occidental, oriental or the western race. The overall facial structure and the upper half of the face were critical in determining facial attractiveness in Indian males while the lower half of the face and the mandibular contour were critical in determining facial attractiveness in females.

Conclusion

It is observed that there is a paucity of facial anthropometric data for the Indian population considering the ethnic, racial and geographic diversity. Since the prevalence of craniofacial anomalies and dentofacial deformities in India is high and thus the scope for corrective surgery, it is important to compile baseline facial anthropometric data based on the ethnic diversity of the Indian population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomes LDEC, Horta KO, Goncalves JR, Santos-Pinto AD (2014) Systematic review: craniocervical posture and craniofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 36(1):55–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raveendran M (2019) The South Asian facial anthropometric profifile: a systematic review. J Cranio Maxillo Fac Surg 47:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durtschi RB, Chung D, Gentry LR, Chung MK, Vorperian HK (2009) Developmental craniofacial anthropometry: assessment of race effects. Clin Anat 22(7):800–808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2005) International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg 16(4):615–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uppada UK, Sinha R, Madishetti S, Pampana SG, Kumar S, Chidagam PR (2020) Ergonomics among oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the Indian States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh—an evaluative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 10:325–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. The World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/region/India.[Accessed 21 June 2023]

  7. Uppada UK, Tauro DP, Senthilnathan KP (2023) Patient satisfaction following orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. J Maxillofacial Oral Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-02066-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uppada UK, Tauro DP, Senthilnathan KP (2023) Is there a need for greater emphasis on clinical facial analysis than cephalometrics & 3D software solutions in the diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with dentofacial deformities? J Maxillofac Oral Surg 22(4):820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uppada UK, Sinha R, Reddy DS, Paul D (2014) Soft tissue changes and its stability as a sequlae to mandibular advancement. Ann Maxillofac Surg 4:132–137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal AS, Abhyankar S, Juneja M, Borgaonkar A (2022) Anthropometric facial proportions in indian population compared to Caucasian population. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 13(2):044

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duggal S, Kapoor DN, Verma S, Sagar M, Lee YS, Moon H et al (2016) Photogrammetric analysis of attractiveness in Indian faces. Arch Plast Surg 43:160–171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta S, Narwal A, Kamboj M, Sharma P, Makkar V, Raman RK (2019) Baseline data of facial parameters in the population of Haryana: an anthropometric study. J Forensic Dent Sci 11:28–34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Saurabh R, Piyush B, Sourabh B, Preeti O, Trivedi R, Vishnoi P (2016) Assessment of facial golden proportions among central Indian population. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 6:S182–S186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tripathi AA, Tandon RP, Hantodkar N (2013) Facial divine proportions in attractive North Indian females: a photographic study. World J Dent 4(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mane DR, Kale AD, Bhai MB, Hallikerimath S (2010) Anthropometric and anthroposcopic analysis of different shapes of faces in group of Indian population: a pilot study. J Forenic Legal Med 17:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shetti RV, Pai SR, Sneha GK, Gupta C, Chethan P (2011) Study of prosopic (facial) index of Indian and Malaysian students. Int J Morphol 29(3):1018–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mani R (2012) Comparitive study of facial index of pushkarna brahmin community of Bikaner district of Rajasthan and other communities and races. J Anat Soc India 61(2):254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar P, Kaur B, Bala M (2020) Anthropometric study of facial morphology in male population of Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. Int J Health Sci Res 10(3):28–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Prasanna PL, Suresh P, Srinivasan K (2020) Anthropometric study of the facial (prosopic) indices: a proof for gender dimorphism. J Dent Educ 13(2):53–59

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prasanna LC, Bhosale S, D’Souza AS, Mamatha H, Thomas RH, Sachin KS (2013) Facial indices of North and South Indian adults: reliability in stature estimation and sexual dimorphism. J Clin Diag Res 7(8):1540–1542

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chitta M, Malathi L (2023) Facial anthropometric analysis of a representative. Indian J Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761596

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chandra HJ, Ravi MS, Sharma SM, Prasad BR (2012) Standards of facial esthetics: an anthropometric study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11(4):384–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalra S, Bagga DK, Agrawal P (2015) Evaluation of various anthropometric proportions in Indian beautiful faces: a photographic study. APOS Trends Orthod 5:190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kunjur J, Sabesan T, Illankovan V (2006) Anthropometric analysis of eyebrows and eyelids: an inter-racial study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasanthakumar P, Kumar P, Rao M (2013) Anthropometric analysis of palpebral fissure dimensions and its position in south Indian ethnic adults. Oman Med J 28(1):26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Price KM, Gupta PK, Woodward JA, Stinnett SS, Murchison AP (2009) Eyebrow and eyelid dimensions: an anthropometric analysis of African Americans and Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):615–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adler FH (1975) Physiology of the eye, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maseedupalli S, Priyanka PV, Konda S, Kolli LN (2023) Head and facial anthropometry of the Indian population for designing a spectacle frame. Indian J Ophthalmol 71:989–993

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ellenbogen R (1983) Transcoronal eyebrow lift with concomitant upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:490–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Whitaker LA, Morales L, Farkas LG (1986) Aesthetic surgery of the supraorbital ridge and forehead structures. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu P, Nathan P, Meng CS (2019) Periocular anthropometry of normal Chinese and Indian populations in Singapore. JOJ Ophthalmol 7(5):555722

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maseedupalli S, Priyanka PV, Konda S, Kolli LN (2023) Head and facial anthropometry of the Indian population for designing a spectacle frame. Ind J Ophthalmol 71:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verma P, Sandhu HK, Verma KG, Goyal S, Sudan M, Ladgotraet A (2016) Morphological variations and biometrics of ear: an aid to personal identification. J Clin Diag Res 10(5):138–142

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maitreyee M (2019) Analysis of morphometric and somatoscopic traits of auricle of ear in India: relation with diversified ethnicities. J Exp Clin Anat 18:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma A, Sidhu NK, Sharma MK, Kapoor K, Singh B (2007) Morphometric study of ear lobule in northwest Indian male subjects. Ana Sci Int 82:98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Purkait R, Singh P (2007) Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: a study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(4):371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chattopadhyay PK, Bhatia S (2009) Morphological examination of ear: a study of an Indian population. Leg Med 11:S190–S193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Singh P, Purkait R (2009) Observations of external ear—an Indian study. HOMO-J Comp Hum Biol 60(5):461–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Thakur S (2019) A study of morphological variations of the human ear for its applications in personal identification. Egyp J Foren Sci 9:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0111-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhandari PS, Dhar S, Gulati A (2021) Anthropometric analysis of linear parameters of the Indian nose: a cross-sectional study and comparison with Literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 74(12):3421–3430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Parab SR, Khan MM (2019) Do aesthetic average nasal parameters matter for rhinoplasty in India? Ind J Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 71(Suppl 3):S2011–S2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina-Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J et al (2010) Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman’s face. J Plast Recons Aesthet Surg 63(11):1825–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shinde SA, Sable RB, Patil AS (2016) Craniofacial anthropometric measurements of adult Indians in angles class I malocclusion. Int J Orthod Rehabil 7:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mehta N, Srivastava RK (2017) The Indian nose: an anthropometric analysis. J Plast Recon Aesth Surg 70(10):1472–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Negus V (1958) The comparative anatomy & physiology of the nose and paranasal sinuses. E & S Livingstone Ltd, Edinburg

    Google Scholar 

  46. Packiriswamy V, Bashour M, Nayak S (2016) Anthropometric analysis of the South Indian woman’s nose. Facial Plast Surg 32:304–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tardy MEJ (1997) Patient evaluation and preparation. In: Tardy MEJ, Mc Grew L (eds) Rhinoplasty: the art and the science. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 36–49

    Google Scholar 

  48. Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Lee ST (1994) Craniofacial norms in 6, 12, 18 year old Chinese subjects. In: Farkas LG (ed) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven Press, New York, pp 201–218

    Google Scholar 

  49. Simans RL (1975) Adjunctive measures in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 8(3):717–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Khandekar B, Srinivasan S, Mokal N, Thatte MR (2005) Anthropometric analysis of lip-nose complex in Indian population. Indian J Plast Surg 38(2):128–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Goel A, Patnaik VVG, Puri N (2015) Lip morphometry in 600 North Indian adults: a data base study for sexual dimorphism. Med Sci Law 55(1):16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharma RL, Pancholi P, Sharma SK, Sastya A (2017) Anthropometric measurement of lips in adults of MP India. Int J App Res 3(2):210–212

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Self-funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College & Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India

    Uday Kiran Uppada & K. P. Senthilnathan

  2. Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India

    Uday Kiran Uppada

  3. Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, The Taulins Clinic, Bengaluru, India

    David P. Tauro

Authors
  1. Uday Kiran Uppada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Tauro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. P. Senthilnathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Uday Kiran Uppada, David P. Tauro and KP Senthilnathan were involved in design of study, data acquisition, data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uday Kiran Uppada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Consent to Participate

Patient consent not required taken.

Ethical Approval

Institutional ethical clearance not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uppada, U.K., Tauro, D.P. & Senthilnathan, K.P. Anthropometric Analysis of Indian Faces: A Systematic Review. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02185-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02185-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation