Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standards of Facial Esthetics: An Anthropometric Study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Anthropometry is an art and science used extensively for measuring the soft tissue proportions. While it is true that error is found in measurements of this kind, a great many trends of growth and development and therapy changes can be recorded with a significant degree of accuracy.

Objective

Facial proportion varies among the different ethnic groups and today, most of the available studies are done on western population. Hence an Anthropometric study was conducted in the local population.

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out with the aim of measuring the facial soft tissue proportion in the local population using anthropometry. Study was done using 100 subjects (50 males and 50 females) with Class I skeletal relationship and pleasing profile. Using standard anthropometric landmarks the various anthropometric measurements and facial proportional indices were determined (both horizontal and vertical) and were compared with that for North American Caucasians.

Results

The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the facial proportion between the two populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gosman SD, Vineland DDS (1950) Anthopometric method of facial analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 36:749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman RT (1999) Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod 116(4):373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas CS, Nanda RS et al (1993) Perception of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod 104(2):180–187

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrario VF et al (1996) Facial three dimensional morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109(1):86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. William Arnett G et al (1999) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis, diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116(3):239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farkas LG, Cheung G (1979) Orbital measurements in the presence of epicanthi in healthy North American Caucasians. Ophthalmologic 179:309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunlevy HA, White RP et al (1987) Professional and lay judgment of facial esthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 3:151–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Jagadish Chandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jagadish Chandra, H., Ravi, M.S., Sharma, S.M. et al. Standards of Facial Esthetics: An Anthropometric Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 11, 384–389 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0355-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0355-9

Keywords

Navigation