Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling risk attitudes by gain at confidence: a case study of transportation problem

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risks arise when decisions are made in a state of indeterminacy (e.g., randomness, fuzziness and uncertainty). Confronted with risks, different decision-makers have different attitudes (risk-seeking, risk-neutral and risk-averse) that are traditionally modeled by the expected utility function. In order to provide a more natural and direct approach to model the risk attitudes, this paper proposes a concept of gain at confidence, where the confidence level indicates the risk attitude, and the gain is its corresponding outcome. To illustrate the performance of modeling risk attitude, in both stochastic and uncertain environments with a transportation problem background, we compare gain at confidence method with expected utility method by analyzing the optimality order relation of the same set of feasible solutions. Three main conclusions are drawn from the analysis. (1) In stochastic environments, we get the same order relation by the gain at confidence method and the expected utility method. Meanwhile, the gain at confidence values represent realistic objective values rather than relative utilities. (2) In uncertain environments, we get the similar conclusion, and find that gain at confidence is easier to calculate than expected utility. (3) Under the same structure and parameter settings, these stochastic models and uncertain models draw the same order relation, which implies uncertain gain at confidence model is an efficient method to model risk attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burghart DR, Epper T, Fehr E (2020) The uncertainty triangle-Uncovering heterogeneity in attitudes towards uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 60(2):125–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Peng J, Zhang B (2017) Uncertain goal programming models for bicriteria solid transportation problem. Appl Soft Comput 51:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1951) Application of the simplex method to a transportation problem. Act Anal Prod A, 359–373

  • D’Ambrosio C, Gentili M, Cerulli R (2020) The optimal value range problem for the interval (immune) transportation problem. Omega 95:102059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Najafabadi E, Azad N, Nezhad MSF (2021a) Risk-averse supplier selection and order allocation in the centralized supply chains under disruption risks. Expert Syst Appl 175:114691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Najafabadi E, Azad N, Pourmohammadi H, Nezhad MSF (2021b) Risk-averse outsourcing strategy in the presence of demand and supply uncertainties. Comput Ind Eng 151:106906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinb 52:399–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Financ Stoch 6(4):429–447

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Yang L, Li S (2016) Uncertain models on railway transportation planning problem. Appl Math Model 40(7–8):4921–4934

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geissel S, Graf H, Herbinger J, Seifried FT (2022) Portfolio optimization with optimal expected utility risk measures. Ann Oper Res 309:59–77

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock FL (1941) The distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities. Stud Appl Math 20(1–4):224–230

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini SD, Verma M (2017) A Value-at-Risk (VAR) approach to routing rail hazmat shipments. Transport Res D-Tr E 54:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilin R (2021) Detection of rare events with uncertain outcomes. Int J Approx Reason 131:252–267

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Liu Y, Chen Y (2018) Modeling a two-stage supply contract problem in a hybrid uncertain environment. Comput Ind Eng 123:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2004) Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundations. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools, vol 3. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad A, Puchinger J, Van Woensel T (2021) Integrating autonomous delivery service into a passenger transportation system. Int J Prod Res 59(7):2116–2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann JV, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J (2013) Risk metrics of loss function for uncertain system. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 2(1):53–64

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pratihar J, Kumar R, Edalatpanah SA, Dey A (2021) Modified Vogel’s approximation method for transportation problem under uncertain environment. Complex Intell Syst 7(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Yao K (2012) A transportation model with uncertain costs and demands. Inform Int interdiscipl J 15(8):3179–3186

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Zhu Y (2017) Optimistic value based optimal control for uncertain linear singular systems and application to a dynamic input-output model. Isa T 71:235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su L, Kwon C (2020) Risk-averse network design with behavioral conditional value-at-risk for hazardous materials transportation. Transport Sci 54(1):184–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Chung SH, Choi TM, Sheu JB, Ma HL (2020) Combating lead-time uncertainty in global supply chain’s shipment-assignment: is it wise to be risk-averse? Transport Res B-Method 138:406–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadelis S (2013) Game theory: an introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero CS (2005) Value at risk and inventory control. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):769–775

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. M&SOM-Manuf Serv Oper 20(4):704–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Qiu W (2005) A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy. Eur J Oper Res 164(3):792–799

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Zhou X (2017) Optimizing on-time arrival probability and percentile travel time for elementary path finding in time-dependent transportation networks: Linear mixed integer programming reformulations. Transport Res B-Meth 96:68–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Liu P, Li S, Gao Y, Ralescu DA (2015) Reduction methods of type-2 uncertain variables and their applications to solid transportation problem. Inf Sci 291:204–237

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Peng J, Li S, Chen L (2016) Fixed charge solid transportation problem in uncertain environment and its algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 102:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Fang SC, Xu Y (2018) Inventory centralization with risk-averse newsvendors. Ann Oper Res 268(1–2):215–237

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Pan D (2020) A transportation planning problem with transfer costs in uncertain environment. Soft Comput 24(4):2647–2653

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Wang J, Yang X, Lev B, Tu Y, Wang S (2018) Portfolio selection under different attitudes in fuzzy environment. Inf Sci 462:278–289

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the outstanding innovative talents cultivation funded programs 2019 Renmin University of China and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in OUC (Grant number 202165010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinwu Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Research not involving human participants and/or animals. All authors have checked the manuscript and have agreed to the submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 351 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Gao, J. Modeling risk attitudes by gain at confidence: a case study of transportation problem. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 14, 11849–11862 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03740-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03740-0

Keywords

Navigation