Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acid-Assisted Recycling of Iron Hydroxide Sludge as a Coagulant for Metalworking Fluid Wastewater Treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coagulation is capable of treating metalworking fluid (MWF) wastewater after MWF oil recovery, as an alternative fuel by dissolved-air flotation, but it yields a substantial amount of oil-contaminated sludge. The oil-contaminated sludge is a resource of coagulant recovery, which reduces the sludge disposal and coagulant cost. This study examined the acid recovery and reusability of iron coagulant for MWF wastewater treatment. Ferric chloride (FeCl3) was used as a coagulant, while hydrochloric acid (HCl) was used in the solubilisation process. Without MWF contamination, the iron hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) to HCl ratio of 3:1 was required to completely dissolve the Fe(OH)3 sludge within 5 min. The presence of MWF oil on the sludge substantially decreased the acid recovery of Fe(OH)3. Even at 30 min, the Fe(OH)3 to HCl ratio of 3:1 could recover only 87.07% by mass of iron. The use of anionic polymer (polyacrylate) as a coagulant aid for MWF treatment made the acid recovery of iron coagulant less effective. Acid-recovered iron coagulant can be reused for four cycles to treat the MWF wastewater because increasing the cycles of reuse lowers the treatment efficiency. The use of HCl waste in this approach reduces both the operational cost and potential global warming effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demirbas, E., Kobya, M.: Operating cost and treatment of metalworking fluid wastewater by chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation processes. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 105, 79–90 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinksmeier, E., Meyer, D., Huesmann-Cordes, A.G., Herrmann, C.: Metalworking fluids—mechanisms and performance. CIRP Ann. 64(2), 605–628 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friesen, M.C., Costello, S., Thurston, S.W., Eisen, E.: Distinguishing the common components of oil- and water-based metalworking fluids for assessment of cancer incidence risk in autoworkers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 54(6), 450–460 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerulová, K., Tatarka, O., Štefko, T., Škulavík, T.: The study of metalworking fluids biodegradability by indirect measurement of bacterial inoculum respiration. J. Slovak Univ. Technol. 23(36), 65–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/rput-2015-0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rabenstein, A., Koch, T., Remesch, M., Brinksmeier, E., Kuever, J.: Microbial degradation of water miscible metal working fluids. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 63(8), 1023–1029 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, L., Han, M., He, F.: A review of treating oily wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 10(2), S1913–S1922 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensadok, K., Belkacem, M., Nezzal, G.: Treatment of cutting oil/water emulsion by coupling coagulation and dissolved air flotation. Desalination 206, 440–448 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phenrat, T., Marhaba, T.F., Rachakornkij, M.: Leaching behaviors of arsenic from arsenic-iron hydroxide sludge during TCLP. J. Environ. Eng. 134(8), 671–682 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karamalidis, A.K., Voudrias, E.A.: Application of stabilization/solidification technology on oil refinery sludge contaminated by heavy metals. J. Environ. Sci. Health. A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 39(4), 961–971 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keeley, J., Jarvis, P., Judd, S.J.: Coagulant recovery from water treatment residuals: a review of applicable technologies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(24), 2675–2719 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, G.R., Yan, Z.C., Wang, Y.C., Wang, N.: Recycle of Alum recovered from water treatment sludge in chemically enhanced primary treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 663–669 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keeley, J., Smith, A.D., Judd, S.J., Jarvis, P.: Acidified and ultrafiltered recovered coagulants from water treatment works sludge for removal of phosphorus from wastewater. Water Res. 88, 380–388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keeley, J., Jarvis, P., Smith, A.D., Judd, S.J.: Coagulant recovery and reuse for drinking water treatment. Water Res. 88, 502–509 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luthy, R., Selleck, R.E., Galloway, T.R.: Removal of emulsified oil with organic coagulants and dissolved air flotation. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50(2), 331–346 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Louie, S.M., Tilton, R.D., Lowry, G.V.: Critical review: impacts of macromolecular coatings on critical physicochemical processes controlling environmental fate of nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 283–310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5en00104h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phenrat, T., Saleh, N., Sirk, K., Kim, H.-J., Tilton, R.D., Lowry, G.V.: Stabilization of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions by anionic polyelectrolytes: adsorbed anionic polyelectrolyte layer properties and their effect on aggregation and sedimentation. J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 795–814 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phenrat, T., Kumloet, I.: Electromagnetic induction of nanoscale zerovalent iron particles accelerates the degradation of chlorinated dense non-aqueous phase liquid: proof of concept. Water Res. 107, 19–28 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Phenrat, T., Fagerlund, F., Illangasekare, T., Lowry, G.V., Tilton, R.D.: Polymer-modified Fe0 nanoparticles target entrapped NAPL in two dimensional porous media: effect of particle concentration, NAPL saturation, and injection strategy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(14), 6102–6109 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Song, J.-E., Phenrat, T., Marinakos, S., Xiao, Y., Liu, J., Wiesner, M.R., Tilton, R.D., Lowry, G.V.: Hydrophobic interactions increase attachment of gum arabic and PVP coated Ag nanoparticles to hydrophobic surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(14), 5988–5995 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alam, M., Akarm, D., Sharmin, E., Zafar, F., Ahmad, S.: Vegetable oil based eco-friendly coating materials: a review article. Arab. J. Chem. 7(4), 469–479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, D., Wang, L., Qian, H., Li, X.: Superhydrophobic surfaces for corrosion protection: a review of recent progresses and future directions. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 13(1), 11–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-015-9744-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadhukhan, J., Joshi, N., Shemfe, M., Lloyd, J.R.: Life cycle assessment of sustainable raw material acquisition for functional magnetite bionanoparticle production. J. Environ. Manage. 199, 116–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry (JEMAI): Japanese carbon footprint program. Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry (JEMAI). http://www.cfp-japan.jp/english (2017). Accessed 1 May 2018

  24. Energy Policy and Planning Office: CO2 emission per kWh. Ministry of Energy. http://www.eppo.go.th/index.php/en/en-energystatistics/co2-statistic?issearch=1&isc=1&ordering=order&category_id=858&xf_37=1 (2018). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 5 Waste. In., p. 135. Hayama, Japan (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was generously supported by the research and researcher for industries (RRi) programme, Thailand Research Fund (TRF) (Grant No. MSD58I0088). We gratefully appreciated the assistance of the staff at the Faculty of Engineering, Naresuan University and C.E.O. International Waste Company Limited who contributed to the success of this research. In addition, we appreciate some partial funding from the Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC) and the S&T Postgraduate Education and Research Development Office (PERDO) for the additional financial support of the research program. Last but not least, PM appreciates the funding from the Graduate School of Naresuan University for her Master degree.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanapon Phenrat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Special Issue: Waste Management & Valorization—ATHENS 2017 Conference.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mooheng, P., Soratana, K. & Phenrat, T. Acid-Assisted Recycling of Iron Hydroxide Sludge as a Coagulant for Metalworking Fluid Wastewater Treatment. Waste Biomass Valor 10, 3635–3645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00696-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00696-9

Keywords

Navigation