Abstract
Researchers found men and women are rated differently on various characteristics according to gender stereotypes (Castillo-Mayen and Montes-Bergesin in Anales de Psicologia 30(3):1044–1060, 2014. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981; Rice and Barth in Gender Issues 33:1–2, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9143-4; Smith et al. in Sex Roles 80:159–171, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0923-7). These stereotypes impact individuals any time they enter into an interview for a position requiring them to be evaluated on a particular skill set. Another set of research has also found individuals are rated differently according to the pitch of their voice (Fasoli et al. in Arch Sex Behav 46:1261–1277, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0; Fasoli and Hegarty in Psychol Women Quart 44(2):234–255, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319891168; Klofstad et al. in Proc Roy Soc 279:2698–2704, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311; O’Connor and Barclay in Evol Hum Behav 38:506–512, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.001; Oleszkiewicz et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 24:856-862, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1146-y). This addresses the possibility that pitch of voice and gendered pronouns interact to impact the application of gender stereotypes. Two studies investigated the interaction between gendered pronouns and voice pitch on evaluations in a job interview setting. The first experiment included 68 participants recruited via email at a private Midwestern college. Gendered pronouns (he/she/the candidate) were provided for a job candidate with a gender-neutral voice pitch. There were no statistically significant differences between gendered pronoun conditions in evaluations of job candidates. The second experiment had 180 participants. Both the pitch (high, neutral, low) and gender pronouns (he, she, and the candidate) were manipulated. There were several significant main effects of perceived gender, and interactions were found between perceived gender and pitch of voice. Pitch and gendered pronouns together affected the way job candidates were evaluated. Specifically, the combination of pitch and gendered pronouns increased the application of gender stereotypes specifically related to emotionality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belin, P., Boehme, B., & McAleer, P. (2017). The sound of trustworthiness: Acoustic-based modulation of perceived voice personality. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185651
Carlsson, M., & Eriksson, S. (2019). In-group gender bias in hiring: Real-world evidence. Economics Letters, 185, 108686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108686
Cartei, V., Banerjee, R., Hardouin, L., & Reby, D. (2019). The role of sex-related voice variation in children’s gender-role stereotype attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 37, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12281
Castillo-Mayen, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of current gender stereotypes. Anales De Psicologia, 30(3), 1044–1060. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981
Chan, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Hiring preferences in online labor markets: Evidence of a female hiring bias. Management Science, 64(7), 2973–2994. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2756
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczeny, S. (2019). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of US public opinion polls from 1946–2018. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
Fasoli, F., & Hegarty, P. (2019). A leader doesn’t sound lesbian!: The impact of sexual orientation vocal cues on heterosexual persons’ first impression and hiring decision. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319891168
Fasoli, F., Hegarty, P., Maass, A., & Antonio, R. (2018). Who wants to sound straight? Sexual majority and minority stereotypes, beliefs and desires about auditory gaydar. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.046
Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M. P., & Sulpizio, S. (2017). Gay- and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0
Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Nowicki, S. (2015). Perceptions of competence, strength, and age influence voters to select leaders with lower pitched voices. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133779
Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 279, 2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
Latham, G. P., & Sue-Chan, C. (1999). A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 40(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086826
Mahrholz, G., Belin, P., & McAleer, P. (2018). Judgements of a speaker’s personality are correlated across differing content and stimulus type. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204991
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599
Notevibes text to speech converter with natural voices, AI Voice Generator | Realistic Text to Speech. March 2020. https://notevibes.com/
O’Connor, J. J. M., & Barclay, P. (2017). The influence of voice pitch on perceptions of trustworthiness across social contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.001
O'Connor, J. J., & Barclay, P. (2018). High voice pitch mitigates the aversiveness of antisocial cues in men's speech. British Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12310
Oleszkiewicz, A., Pisanski, K., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Agnieszka Sorokowska, A. (2017). Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 856–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1146-y
Rice, L., & Barth, J. M. (2016). Hiring decisions: The effect of evaluator gender and gender stereotype characteristics on the evaluation of job applicants. Gender Issues, 33, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9143-4
Smith, D. G., Rosenstein, J. E., Nikolov, M. C., & Chaney, D. A. (2019). The power of language: Gender, status, and agency in performance evaluations. Sex Roles, 80, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0923-7
Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Poitras, J. (2010). Gender and job role congruence: A field study of trust in labor mediators. Sex Roles, 63, 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9844-9
Zoghaib, A. (2019). Persuasion of voices: The effects of a speaker’s voice characteristics and gender of consumers’ responses. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570719828687
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ED and CM collaborated on all aspects of the project including: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics Approval
The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Indiana Wesleyan University (IRB ID#: 1475.20).
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.
Consent for Publication
Each participant consented to allowing their responses to be utilized for research and to become part of a published journal article or scholarly presentation.
Research Repository Registration
The data has been deposited in the open science framework (OSF) repository: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8JFC6.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Devers, E., Meeks, C. Gender, Voice, and Job Stereotypes. Psychol Stud 69, 69–80 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-023-00765-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-023-00765-z