Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The mechanism of action of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) remains debatable.1 In ESPB, a local anesthetic (LA) bolus is typically injected in the interfascial plane between the vertebral transverse process and the erector spinae muscle,2 followed by catheterization for prolonged analgesia through LA boluses and/or continuous infusion.
We have often noticed that intermittent LA boluses through an erector spinae plane (ESP) catheter provide better/more extensive analgesia than continuous (with equivalent LA volume/concentration) infusion. To test the hypothesis that LA boluses provide a wider cephalocaudal spread compared with continuous infusion, we performed, with approval by the Queen’s University and Kingston Health Sciences Center Research Ethics Board (Kingston, ON, Canada; TRAQ #6030180; no consent was required), bilateral ESP bolus injections in a cadaver (fresh/frozen, male, ~1.70 m, ~65 kg) with LA + fluorescein (Figure, panel A) followed by catheterization. Subsequently (Figure, panel B), we ran a continuous LA + methylene blue (LA + MB) infusion through the right-sided catheter at the end of which we bolused a similar volume of LA + MB through the left-sided catheter (infusion details in figure caption) prior to cadaveric dissection.
A wider cephalocaudal spread was observed with bolus injection (Figure, panel A and panel B, left side) than with continuous infusion (Figure, panel B, right side) following similar injectate volume. Notably, the use of two dyes allowed us to differentiate the spread of the initial bilateral bolus (fluorescein) from that of the follow-up left-sided bolus (MB) and right-sided infusion (MB). The spread after the follow-up bolus was much wider than that from the follow-up continuous infusion. Had we only used one dye, we could not have ruled out that the wider left-sided spread was from the initial bolus.
This is the first report to demonstrate (1) the utility of fluorescein as a dye in cadaveric studies investigating LA spread in regional blocks; (2) the concurrent use of different dyes to determine the spread of LA in different (bolus vs. continuous infusion) regimens; and (3) the difference in LA spread between ESP (bolus and continuous infusion) injections. Our findings could help future studies to investigate ideal volumes and injection techniques for ESPB and other blocks.
References
Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anesth 2021; 68: 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 621–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0000000000000451
Disclosures
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding statement
Support was provided by the Alison B. Froese Research Fund in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen’s University and The Senate Advisory Research Committee, Queen’s University.
Editorial responsibility
This submission was handled by Dr. Vishal Uppal, Associate Editor, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mizubuti, G.B., Klar, G., Ho, A.MH. et al. A novel “double-dye” technique to determine the injectate spread of bolus versus continuous infusion in erector spinae plane block in cadavers. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 70, 161–162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02347-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02347-5