Abstract
Purpose
Grief is a normal reaction, and most family members (FMs) experience grief following a death. Typically, grief subsides without any major psychological or medical impairment. Nevertheless, some FMs may experience complicated grief (CG) reactions, with symptoms lasting months or years, and CG is particularly prominent among FMs of those who die in the intensive care unit (ICU). The purpose of this study was to examine how FMs experience grief, particularly CG, to inform future early screening and support programs in the ICU.
Methods
This was a multicentre qualitative study focusing on semi-structured interviews with FMs who displayed symptoms of CG. Family members of patients who died in the ICU and who had a six-month inventory of CG score > 25 were included. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with FMs post-loss, with follow-up interviews three months after the initial interviews.
Results
Major themes identified following thematic analysis from eight participants with CG included 1) ante-mortem experience: the impact of the ICU experience prior to death of a loved on subsequent grief; 2) post-mortem experience: unpredictable post death reactions; 3) coping strategies: techniques used to reduce the severity of grief reactions; 4) sources of support: focusing on resources that the FM draws from for emotional support; and 5) perspectives on future ICU bereavement screening and support programs: advice that FM participants provided for future bereavement support.
Conclusion
Bereaved FMs with CG described their experiences with grief, how ICU events influenced their bereavement, their coping strategies and sources of support, and their advice for future bereavement support programs for FMs of deceased ICU patients.
Résumé
Objectif
Le deuil est une réaction normale et la plupart des membres d’une famille l’éprouvent après un décès. Habituellement, le deuil décroit sans laisser de troubles psychologiques ou médicaux majeurs. Néanmoins, certains membres d’une famille peuvent présenter des réactions de deuil compliquées, avec des symptômes durant des mois ou des années et ce deuil compliqué est particulièrement visible lorsqu’un membre de la famille est décédé dans une unité de soins intensifs (USI). Cette étude avait pour objectif d’examiner comment les membres d’une famille vivent un deuil, en particulier un deuil compliqué, pour renseigner de futurs programmes de dépistage précoce et de soutien en USI.
Méthodes
Il s’est agi d’une étude qualitative multicentrique utilisant principalement des entretiens semi-structurés avec des membres de familles qui présentaient des symptômes de deuil compliqué. Des membres de la famille de patients décédés en USI qui dans les derniers 6 mois avaient un score > 25 au questionnaire de deuil compliqué ont été inclus. Les entretiens semi-structurés ont été menés après le décès avec des membres de la famille et des entretiens de suivi ont eu lieu trois mois après l’entretien initial.
Résultats
Les principaux thèmes identifiés après une analyse thématique de huit participants ayant un deuil compliqué ont inclus : 1) le vécu avant le décès : l’impact de l’expérience de l’USI avant le décès d’un être cher sur le deuil qui a suivi; 2) le vécu après le décès : les réactions imprévisibles après le décès; 3) les stratégies de réponse face au stress : Les techniques utilisées pour réduire les réactions de deuil; 4) les sources de soutien : en se concentrant sur les ressources que le membre de la famille utilise pour un soutien émotionnel; et 5) le point de vue sur de futurs programmes de dépistage et de soutien en USI : les conseils que les membres participants des familles ont donnés pour un futur soutien du deuil.
Conclusion
Les membres de familles endeuillées présentant un deuil compliqué ont décrit leur vécu du deuil, comment les événements vécus en USI l’ont influencé, leurs stratégies de réponse et la source des soutiens utilisés, ainsi que leurs conseils pour de futurs programmes de soutien du deuil destinés aux familles de patients décédés en USI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
When patients die, family members (FMs) and close friends experience grief related to their loss. Grief reactions can be relatively brief, but can also be prolonged and associated with impaired social function as well as psychological and medical morbidity.1,2,3 These grief reactions, variously referred to as complicated grief (CG),4 prolonged grief disorder,5 or persistent complex bereavement-related disorder,6 are common among FMs of patients who die in the intensive care unit (ICU)1 with a reported incidence as high as 52% (depending on the criteria applied).7,8,9
Bereavement support has been identified as a research and clinical priority within the ICU setting10,11 and many bereaved FMs of those who die in the ICU express the desire for bereavement support.9,12 Nevertheless, there is little research about structures, processes, and outcomes for routine bereavement support in this context. While effective treatments for severe grief reactions exist,13,14 there are barriers to identifying and supporting bereaved FMs with severe symptoms. For example, FMs may be reluctant to be contacted or to accept bereavement support. In a mixed-methods study of 105 bereaved FMs, we previously found that 19% met criteria for CG, but only half were willing to receive formal support.15 Notably, there was no correlation between the presence of CG and the willingness to receive support. In the quantitative part of this study, we focused on identifying symptoms and predictors of CG in FMs after a loss. This paper describes the bereavement experience of those who developed CG, including their coping strategies and sources of support, and their advice for approaching future FMs at risk of CG.
Methods
The protocol was initially approved (September 4, 2014) by the University Health Network (UHN) Research Ethics Board (REB) for a mixed-method study. Following the UHN approval, REB approval was also obtained from the eight following participating centres: UHN - Toronto Western Site, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto; St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto; St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton; Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary; Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary; Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary; and South Health Campus, Calgary.
Study design and sample size
The overall study used a two-phase sequential explanatory design involving FMs and ICU healthcare providers. In the quantitative portion, we recruited ICU staff and bereaved FMs to complete surveys including the inventory of complicated grief (ICG). The FMs ICG scores were measured at three and six months to identify those with symptoms of CG, and to identify those who were willing to participate in the qualitative portion of the study. For the qualitative portion of the study, we used purposive sampling to ensure a good representation of all study sites and demographics from the 105 FMs who enrolled in the quantitative portion of the study. Of the 37 FMs who were interviewed at three months after the death of their loved one, eight FMs were found to have an ICG score above 25 at six months after the loss (Appendix B). For this report, we analyzed the three- and six-month interview data from these eight FMs who met criteria for CG because we are interested in developing a bereavement program for those with CG.
Data collection
Two qualitative researchers (C.K., A.R.) conducted the semi-structured interviews. The interview guide was developed to move from open to increasingly structured questions. We started with an open-ended question designed to elicit participants’ stories that allowed them to control the direction, content, and pace of the conversation. We then used probing questions to explore their narrative in greater depth, asking about topics they had raised and incorporating words they had used. Lastly, we used semi-structured questions developed from the research team’s expertise, a literature review on bereavement, and topics frequently raised by the participants (Appendix A).
Participants were first invited to share their bereavement narratives following the death of their loved one in the ICU. The latter would enable participants to control the direction of their stories and to set the pace of the conversation.16 Afterwards, specific follow-up questions were presented to understand discrete time frames of their ICU experiences: 1) the time leading up to death, 2) the time after death, 3) commemoration, and 4) existing and future need of support (Appendix A). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed.
Data analysis
A grounded theory approach was employed. First, four authors (J.D., T.S., C.K., A.R.) used thematic analysis as articulated by Braun and Clarke to analyze the data.17 Analysis consisted of inductive and iterative open coding that identified emergent themes that would be labelled from terms relevant to the literature or used by participants. Second, the emerging codes were discussed and organized into core themes. NVivo software (QSR International, Doncaster, Australia) was used to facilitate qualitative analysis. Finally, the team organized the main themes to articulate a comprehensible understanding of the analyzed data. Methodological rigor was assured using qualitative researchers with expertise in qualitative methods and bereavement, including critical care, palliative care, and anthropology.
Results
We interviewed eight bereaved FMs with CG at three months post-loss, of which four were able to complete a second interview at six months. These eight participants represented five of the study sites, and their demographics appear in Appendix C. Thematic analysis identified five common themes related to the FMs’ bereavement experience and their coping or support.
Ante-mortem experience
Although the interview questions focused on bereavement, FMs often spoke of experiences before death, including staff support. Nevertheless, most expressed concerns about the care received or the structure of the ICU, and some made a direct link between care delivered and the FM’s bereavement experience. One woman who lost her husband in the ICU explained how a doctor told her, “to take [my husband] off life support, literally after having met me 30 sec before, and I ran down the stairs” followed by a “kind” respiratory therapist who apologized for the physician’s directness.
In addition, many expressed disappointment with the communication and support offered in the ICU. One FM stated that his uncle’s illness had not been taken seriously until the situation had become dire and he was subsequently dissatisfied with the information communicated. In general, FMs were particularly frustrated with the inaccessibility of physicians and the lack of explanations they received.
Communication received by FMs in the ICU was not necessarily aimed at supporting grieving FMs. One FM who was also a physician and whose wife died in the ICU explained how, “ICU people were friendly, objective, knowledgeable, but they weren’t supportive in terms of grief”. This would leave dealing with the emotional elements of the dying process entirely up to the FM. Participants also expressed frustration with the lack of continuity between attending ICU staff and the resultant disjointed communication.
Post-mortem experience
Family members reported specific frustrations with the hospital and the care team. These experiences took place following the death of their loved one and often included interactions with the hospital or ICU staff, or their lack thereof. One FM described a “ridiculous” situation of trying to obtain an autopsy report of her deceased uncle that was sent to his family doctor; later being offered the documents at “a dollar [cost] a sheet”. This left the family unsure about the cause of death, which negatively influenced their bereavement experience. Another participant expressed “a total loathing of the foundations of these [hospital] organizations”, who continued to send letters to his deceased wife asking for donations because she had been a patient there. He explained how receiving these persistent letters would re-ignite his anger and impair his recovery.
Participants also described challenges they experienced related to commemoration ceremonies. Some reported feeling irritated by the behaviour of others at the funeral. In addition to the emotional intensity of the ceremony, some found it challenging to create a monument worthy of the deceased. One of the FMs was unable to hold a ceremony for over a year following his wife’s death.
Most participants described specific and unpredictable events that would “trigger” an uncontrollable emotional reaction. These trigger events were so upsetting that FMs would limit their exposure to and interactions with others as a coping strategy. One participant explained the unpredictability of these triggers. She recounted how, months after her husband’s death, she was at a luau party in Hawaii and suddenly felt “crumbling tears” from the strong emotional response. She elaborated that the, “[luau] has nothing to do with my husband except I’d been to one with him before”.
In addition to unpredictable triggers, participants described a volatile bereavement trajectory, fluctuating between extremes of functional capacity. A woman whose husband died explained how, “there’re days when I’m completely normal and then there’re days that you feel kind of like you can’t function”. This contributed to difficulty in coping with the new reality for the bereaved, who were often taking on new responsibilities in response to the death. Some commented that fear of severe emotional responses hindered their ability to move on.
For many, their loved one’s death coupled with limited social interaction led them to feel an intense loneliness. One participant who lost his wife said, “I think the worst thing is the loneliness. It’s so fierce. And that we had plans that we didn’t follow through”. As this interviewee described, the combination of social isolation and regret of unrealized plans further intensified the feelings of loss.
Coping strategies
Most participants reported efforts to distract themselves from their grief. This included returning to work or taking on a greater workload. A physician participant who lost his wife acknowledged that he was “deliberately driving the thought [of his wife] away” through going back to work. As a form of coping, some bereaved FMs would find ways to maintain a connection with the deceased. For many, the deceased remained a constant presence in their lives. Sometimes, this would take the form of an everyday conversation with the deceased or in events that took place after the death.
In some cases, participants found themselves providing support to others, such as family and friends affected by loss. This was sometimes therapeutic, as the bereaved felt good about helping those who were struggling with grief. In other cases, participants felt that it was challenging to support others, particularly when being called on to support friends or FMs suffering from the same loss or having to play a social role once belonging to the deceased. Methods of coping with the loss varied across participants, and often incorporated some aspects of the deceased’s life. Most found it helpful to read about or discuss their experiences with grief.
Sources of support
Bereaved FMs identified friends and other FMs as their primary sources of support, yet reactions to support varied. Some bereaved FMs likened the isolation that accompanied the bereavement experience to keeping oneself in a protective “cocoon” to shield themselves from the grief. These FMs often had relatives or friends who would check in on them and ensure they were receiving support. Participants typically appreciated friends and family being able to help. Friends who were not bereaved were considered less helpful; participants felt that such friends did not truly understand their experience. One participant summarized this sentiment as follows:
“when you lose everything you’re back to your childhood state and you’re dependent on other people for your physical needs. And so that’s why those are my friends because they went through the same experience as me. And they would be the most empathetic to my needs, not my work colleagues that absolutely don’t understand.”
At the same time, participants sometimes felt burdened by receiving support from friends and other FMs who were also grieving from the loss, since it had the capacity to re-trigger their grief.
Some participants sought support from a formal bereavement counsellor or support group; these were identified as positive experiences. These sources, unlike the inconsistent support of friends and FMs, were reported as particularly helpful in coping with symptoms of grief and in understanding bereavement.
Perspectives on future ICU bereavement screening and support programs
Participants’ narratives revealed commonalities specific to their observations of a program to screen and support bereaved FMs. Even though only half of participants with CG had received formal support, the majority could see positive aspects of such a program. Several expressed disbelief that support was not already being routinely offered. One participant explained, “I was actually quite surprised that there wasn’t a bit more follow-up other than getting a letter”, stating the “[hospital would] have a memorial service once a month that I could attend at any time. It was very impersonal”. Such examples underscore the lack of recognition of the emotional and social needs of bereaved FMs.
Others stated that routine follow-up would not be necessary and suggested that support was only needed if requested by the bereaved or if their symptoms worsened. Many participants had good experience with support groups, and this was suggested as an important component of any future support system. One participant compared her support group to a “lifeline” whose members were “like-minded and it’s just, good to talk to people that aren’t in my situation”, but who can connect as they are all going through their own challenging experiences.
Other suggestions included a brochure to explain the process of grief, manage expectations, and provide support resources to bereaved individuals. Some requested a meeting with a physician to review events or discuss the results of the autopsy.
There was broad agreement that everyone experiences bereavement differently, and participants thought it would be important to have a personalized approach to bereavement support. Several received standard letters from the hospital after the death, and these were “nice” but not valued. In contrast, one participant greatly appreciated a call she received a week after the death from an ICU nurse. Furthermore, several participants commented that the bereaved should not be approached too soon after the death.
Discussion
We report these qualitative study results by examining the bereavement experiences of FMs who developed CG after a loss in the ICU. We learned about their experiences before and after the loss, as well as their coping strategies, sources of support, and suggestions for a future program of screening and support.
Participants often mentioned frustration with aspects of care or communication prior to their loved one’s death in the ICU. Previous studies have shown that CG is associated with a perception of poor communication.8,15 Curtis et al. highlighted the importance of choosing words carefully when communicating with FMs in the ICU,18 and showed that dedicated communication “facilitators” may be effective for reducing depression among the bereaved.19 Family members frequently report poor end-of-life care in the acute setting.20,21 Nevertheless, our results in both this study and a previous study9 show high rates of satisfaction with care overall, suggesting that a global assessment of quality of care may mask specific events that influence bereavement. Notably, we found that participants who did not want support tended to have had difficult interactions with others (FMs, staff, etc.) during hospital care and bereavement. These difficulties with interactions may be an important predictor of CG meriting further exploration. Nevertheless, we cannot determine if this reaction is an immutable barrier to not accepting support, or something that could be addressed by leveraging existing supportive relationships with other staff members in hospital, other FMs, or friends throughout and beyond the patient’s illness.22
Continuity of care is an ongoing challenge in the ICU with frequent handovers between nurses and physicians. This can lead to inconsistency and difficulty creating stable relationships with FMs. As in previous research,9 we found that many participants were eager to meet with the medical team in follow-up to review events around the death. This contrasts with the findings of van der Klink et al.,12 who reported a generally good understanding among FMs of the events leading to death, and that only 35% of participants wanted follow-up with the medical team. One study of physicians and nurses reported their comfort providing medical information after a death,9 which might address FM’s reflection about aspects of care.
Most ICUs do not offer any bereavement follow-up.23 Our participants provided helpful suggestions for designing a screening and support program. Morris and Block reported similar findings when developing a bereavement service at a cancer centre.24 They highlight the favourable impact of the cancer centre acknowledging the death with a condolence letter, 24 although our results suggest that this needs to be personalized to be of benefit.15 A recent mixed-methods study of an ICU-based support program for dying patients and their families found that personalized sympathy cards were valued by FMs.25 Nevertheless, a randomized-controlled trial by Kentish-Barnes et al. showed higher rates of long-term depression among FMs of ICU decedents who received an individualized semi-structured condolence letter.26 The authors of that study, and the participants in our study, have emphasized the importance of timing; a bereavement intervention delivered too early could cause distress. Other studies have shown harm from interventions intended to be supportive that were delivered to FMs of seriously ill patients27,28 and to people exposed to a traumatic event.29 Complicated grief interventions are ineffective for bereaved FMs who do not have CG.14 The integration of electronic medical information systems provides hospitals with the opportunity to improve their outreach efforts and avoid sending inappropriate fundraising letters to deceased patients that can cause harm to FMs. The timing, content, and selection of participants must be carefully considered in designing support programs.
Many participants highlighted the perceived benefits of participating in the interviews. This was previously described in Holocaust survivors,30 and Germain et al. reported similar results in a study of bereaved FMs of patients who died at home,31 identifying key adaptive themes such as the final hours of resilience. Barnato et al.32 piloted a narrative intervention delivered by trained social workers to 32 bereaved FMs approximately one month after their loved one’s death. This intervention was like the narrative interview approach taken in this study and was perceived as beneficial by participants.
Many participants suggested that informational resources (e.g., pamphlet) might help manage expectations, reassure those experiencing severe emotional responses to “triggers”, or suggest coping skills such as keeping busy or talking with other bereaved individuals. Morris and Block described similar components in their bereavement service,24 but a large survey identified that only 39/237 (16%) of ICUs provide such a service.23 We should note that our participants were all experiencing severe grief reactions, so we cannot know whether their coping strategies were effective means of overcoming CG, or maladaptive strategies that exacerbated their symptoms. Nevertheless, ICUs interested in establishing a bereavement support group may benefit from co-designing such an intervention with bereaved FMs.
Strengths of our study were that the study population was drawn from a diverse representation of FMs, as well as the narrative interview approach, which generated rich descriptions. There are also limitations to our study. The study population was selected through purposeful sampling, which is inevitable because of the emotional and logistical challenges associated with recruiting bereaved FMs. The eight participants in this analysis provided varying accounts of their grief, as expected because of the profoundly individual bereavement experience. While this study design limits our ability to draw broader conclusions about how ICU events impact bereavement and the effectiveness of specific coping and support strategies, we plan to develop a bereavement program and then study its feasibility and effectiveness in future research. Future research projects on this topic may benefit from including FMs with bereavement experience as partners to co-design the intervention.
Conclusions
Family members experiencing CG describe many unique experiences and sources of support yet identify several commonalities. The perceptions that FMs offered about supporting FMs at risk of CG provide insight into elements of bereavement support that may be well received following death of a loved one. This research is an important first step in developing initiatives to screen for severe grief reactions and support FMs with CG following a death in the ICU. Future research will need to expand the scope of how bereavement support is provided to FMs and identify which interventions are both feasible in ICUs and effective in reducing CG among bereaved FMs.
References
Kentish-Barnes N, Prigerson HG. Is this bereaved relative at risk of prolonged grief? Intensive Care Med 2015; 142: 1279-81.
Prigerson HG, Jacobs SC. Perspectives on care at the close of life. Caring for bereaved patients: “all the doctors just suddenly go”. JAMA 2001; 286: 1369-76.
Cuthbertson SJ, Margetts MA, Streat SJ. Bereavement follow-up after critical illness. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1196-201.
Shear MK. Clinical practice. Complicated grief. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 153-60.
Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, et al. Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med 2009; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121.
Boelen PA, Prigerson HG. Commentary on the inclusion of persistent complex bereavement-related disorder in DSM-5. Death Stud 2012; 36: 771-94.
Kentish-Barnes N, Chaize M, Seegers V, et al. Complicated grief after death of a relative in the intensive care unit. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1341-52.
Siegel MD, Hayes E, Vanderwerker LC, Loseth DB, Prigerson HG. Psychiatric illness in the next of kin of patients who die in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 1722-8.
Downar J, Barua R, Sinuff T. The desirability of an intensive care unit (ICU) clinician-led bereavement screening and support program for family members of ICU decedents (ICU bereave). J Crit Care 2014; 29(311): e319-416.
Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 953-63.
Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 605-22.
van der Klink MA, Heijboer L, Hofhuis JG, et al. Survey into bereavement of family members of patients who died in the intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2010; 26: 215-25.
Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 469-78.
Mancini AD, Griffin P, Bonanno GA. Recent trends in the treatment of prolonged grief. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012; 25: 46-51.
Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 987-94.
Anderson C, Kirkpatrick S. Narrative interviewing. Int J. Clin Pharm 2016; 38: 631-4.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ (Eds). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2012: 57-71.
Curtis JR, Sprung CL, Azoulay E. The importance of word choice in the care of critically ill patients and their families. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 606-8.
Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, et al. Randomized trial of communication facilitators to reduce family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 154-62.
Stajduhar K, Allan D, Bidgood D, et al. Differences in quality of end-of-life care provided in inpatient health care settings. J Palliat Care 2010; RF1-B (abstract).
Rodriguez Villar S, Sanchez Casado M, Prigerson HG, et al. Prolonged grief disorder in the next of kin of adult patients who die during or after admission to intensive care. Chest 2012; 141: 1635-6.
Lichtenthal WG, Nilsson M, Kissane DW, et al. Underutilization of mental health services among bereaved caregivers with prolonged grief disorder. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 1225-9.
McAdam JL, Erikson A. Bereavement services offered in adult intensive care units in the United States. Am J Crit Care 2016; 25: 110-7.
Morris SE, Block SD. Adding value to palliative care services: the development of an institutional bereavement program. J Palliat Med 2015; 18: 915-22.
Cook DJ, Swinton M, Toledo F, et al. Personalizing death in the intensive care unit: the 3 Wishes Project: a mixed-methods study. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 271-9.
Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Champigneulle B, et al. Effect of a condolence letter on grief symptoms among relatives of patients who died in the ICU: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 473-84.
Carson SS, Cox CE, Wallenstein S, et al. Effect of palliative care-led meetings for families of patients with chronic critical illness: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316: 51-62.
Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW, et al. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 2271-81.
Rose S, Bisson J, Churchill R, Wessely S. Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 2: CD000560.
Rosenthal G. The healing effects of storytelling: on the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qual Inq 2003; 9: 915-33.
Germain A, Mayland CR, Jack BA. The potential therapeutic value for bereaved relatives participating in research: an exploratory study. Palliat Support Care 2016; 14: 479-87.
Barnato AE, Schenker Y, Tiver G, et al. Storytelling in the early bereavement period to reduce emotional distress among surrogates involved in a decision to limit life support in the ICU: a pilot feasibility trial. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: 35-46.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by an Academic Medical Organization Innovation Grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. James Downar is supported by a Phoenix Fellowship from Associated Medical Services, Incorporated. Deborah Cook holds a Research Chair of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. We are grateful to Kristy Buck, Hyun-Zu Lee, Rose Piacentino and Neala Hoad who helped to identify potential family members.
Author contributions
JD, CK, ARO, and TS contributed to study conception and design, and data acquisition, analysis and interpretation. OS, DC, and EK contributed to study design, data acquisition, and data interpretation. JD and TS drafted the initial manuscript, and all authors participated substantially in revision of the manuscript. AP-B and BV-W contributed to the manuscript’s revisions.
Conflict of interest
None.
Funding
This research was funded by an Academic Medical Organization Innovation Grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. James Downar is supported by a Phoenix Fellowship from Associated Medical Services, Incorporated.
Editorial responsibility
This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
APPENDIX A Interview guide
Opening question:
To begin, I would like to ask you if you could describe your unique bereavement experience in your own words, and how it has unfolded since your (loved one) died in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Follow-up questions:
-
1.
1.On ICU experience: Was there a moment that was especially significant or that stands out for you for one reason or another in the ICU while your (loved one) was there, and if so, could you tell me about it?
-
2.
On the time leading up to death: Could you tell me about the time leading up to your (loved one’s) death? Could you tell me about things that were helpful? Is there anything you wish had happened differently?
-
3.
On the time period immediately after death: Can you describe your feelings during the first few days after your (loved one) died? What helped you cope at the time, and how?
-
4.
On rituals and gatherings: Can you tell me whether you decided to have any ritual or gathering, and how it made you feel? If not, could you tell me how you made the decision and how you felt or feel about it?
-
5.
On the time period after rituals: Can you recall some of the main feelings you had after the ritual/gathering? How have these feelings changed since then? Have you found things that helped you? Was there any other difficult event that happened? If so, can you tell me about it?
-
6.
On now: Could you tell me about your life now? How do you feel now? Could you talk to me about how one of your days goes? What about yesterday?
-
7.
On the future: Could you tell me about your feelings regarding the future?
-
8.
On commemoration: How do you remember your (loved one)? Could you tell me about memories that stand out to you? Is there any particular way you try to commemorate him/her? How has commemoration changed since s/he died?
-
9.
On existing and desirable support: Could you talk to me about whether there is anything that helps you cope in your bereavement that you have not mentioned yet?
-
Have you sought out any professional help or support? How helpful has it been? Have you had any follow-up from the hospital, such as a call, a letter? And from the ICU? Have you participated in a memorial service or a bereavement group at the hospital? If relevant: Have you sought out support so you can support your kids in their bereavement?
-
What (other) support services are you familiar with? Is there any support you have not found but you wish existed?
-
How would you feel about an ICU staff led follow-up service and bereavement program? What do you think would make such a follow-up/bereavement program helpful for you and other families in the future? What would it entail?
-
-
10.
To finish, is there anything that I have not asked about your bereavement experience and the support you have found or would like to find, but I should have?
Thank you for your time and willingness to share your experience with us. If there is anything else that comes up, and you feel you want to share with us, please contact me. If you are interested to talk about your experience of bereavement in three months, it would be very helpful for us.
APPENDIX B Sampling and participation by site
Bereaved English-speaking FMs at participating centres were contacted three to six months after the patient’s death and offered the opportunity to participate in a two-part quantitative telephone survey about their bereavement experience. We attempted to identify and contact the next-of-kin of 860 patients, but were unable to contact 607 (69%), usually because we received no response to a letter and two follow-up phone calls or because the letter was returned and/or the telephone number had been disconnected. At the end of the first part of the survey, FMs were invited to participate in the qualitative portion of the study. The second part of the quantitative study was conducted three months after the first, and included an assessment for CG based on an ICG score > 25. For the qualitative portion of the study, we selected participants using purposive sampling and a maximum variation approach, to ensure balanced representation from all study sites (see below). Approximately three months after the qualitative interview, FMs were invited to participate in a follow-up qualitative interview. Given our interest in developing a bereavement program for those with CG, we focused the present analysis on interview data from participants who met criteria for CG.
Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | Site 5 | Sites 6-9* | TOTAL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enrolment period (months) | 9 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 9 | |
Eligible patients | 62 | 46 | 50 | 25 | 29 | 35 | 247 |
Completed initial and follow-up quantitative survey | 20 (32%) | 15 (33%) | 18 (36%) | 5 (20%) | 7 (24%) | 18 (51%) | 83 (34%) |
Participated in qualitative interview after initial questionnaire | 9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 37 (45%) |
Participating centres
The nine centres were: University Health Network- Toronto General Site, Toronto; University Health Network- Toronto Western Site, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto; St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto; St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton; Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary; Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary; Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary; South Health Campus, Calgary.
Appendix C Demographic characteristics of family member participants
Participant # | ICG score | Age | Sex | Highest level of education | Relation to diseased | Region of Origin | Degree of religiosity/ spirituality | Diagnosed with anxiety/depression | Received medication for anxiety/depression |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 26 | 57 | Female | Postgraduate university | Spouse | Canada | Somewhat | No | Never |
2 | 38 | 72 | Male | Postgraduate university | Spouse | Australia/ Oceania | Not at all | Yes | Currently |
3 | 27 | 32 | Female | Undergraduate university | Child | Canada | Minimally | Yes | In the past |
4 | 40 | 38 | Female | Secondary education | Niece | Canada | Very | Yes | In the past |
5 | 38 | 64 | Male | Technical school | Spouse | Canada | Minimally | No | Never |
6 | 34 | 55 | Female | Undergraduate university | Spouse | Canada | Somewhat | No | Never |
7 | 27 | 34 | Female | Undergraduate university | Spouse | Canada | Very | No | Never |
8 | 25 | 76 | Female | Secondary school | Spouse | Canada | Somewhat | Yes | Currently |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Downar, J., Sinuff, T., Kalocsai, C. et al. A qualitative study of bereaved family members with complicated grief following a death in the intensive care unit. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 67, 685–693 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01573-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01573-z