Skip to main content
Log in

Difference between “Physical Fitness Age” Based on Physical Function and Chronological Age Is Associated with Obesity, Hyperglycemia, Depressive Symptoms, and Low Serum Albumin

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to (1) develop the physical fitness age, which is the biological age based on physical function, (2) evaluate the validity of the physical fitness age for the assessment of sarcopenia, and (3) examine the factors associated with the difference between physical fitness age and chronological age.

Design

Cross-sectional study

Setting and Participants

Community-dwelling older adults and outpatients.

Measurements

A formula for calculating the physical fitness age was created based on the usual walking speed, handgrip strength, one-leg standing time, and chronological age of 4,076 older adults from the pooled data of community-dwelling and outpatients using the principal component analysis. For the validation of the physical fitness age, we also used pooled data from community-dwelling older adults (n = 1929) and outpatients (n = 473). Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus. The association of D-age (the difference between physical and chronological ages) with cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and cardiac function was examined.

Results

The receiver operating characteristic analysis, with sarcopenia as the outcome, showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of physical fitness age was greater than that of chronological age (AUC 0.87 and 0.77, respectively, p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the D-age was significantly associated with sarcopenia after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19–1.26; p <0.001). In multivariate linear regression analysis with D-age as the dependent variable, D-age was independently associated with a history of diabetes mellitus (or hemoglobin A1c as a continuous variable), obesity, depression, and low serum albumin level. D-age was also correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate derived from serum cystatin C, brain natriuretic peptide, and ankle-brachial index, reflecting some organ function and arteriosclerosis.

Conclusions

Compared to chronological age, physical fitness age calculated from handgrip strength, one-leg standing time, and usual walking speed was a better scale for sarcopenia. D-age, which could be a simple indicator of physical function, was associated with modifiable factors, such as poor glycemic control, obesity, depressive symptoms, and malnutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J et al. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:300–307.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994 Mar;49:M85–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jee H, Jeon BH, Kim YH, Kim HK, Choe J, Park J, Jin Y. Development and application of biological age prediction models with physical fitness and physiological components in Korean adults. Gerontology 2012;58:344–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000335738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakagaichi M, Anan Y, Hikiji Y, Uratani S. Developing an assessment based on physical fitness age to evaluate motor function in frail and healthy elderly women. Clin Interv Aging 2018;13:179–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S146996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taniguchi Y, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, Motohashi Y, Shinkai S. A prospective study of gait performance and subsequent cognitive decline in a general population of older Japanese. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67:796–803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murayama H, Nishi M, Shimizu Y, Kim MJ, Yoshida H, Amano H, Fujiwara Y, Shinkai S. The Hatoyama Cohort Study: design and profile of participants at baseline. J Epidemiol 2012;22:551–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20120015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shinkai S, Watanabe S, Kumagai S, Fujiwara Y, Amano H, Yoshida H, Ishizaki T, Yukawa H, Suzuki T, Shibata H. Walking speed as a good predictor for the onset of functional dependence in a Japanese rural community population. Age Ageing 2000;29:441–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/29.5.441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishizaki T, Watanabe S, Suzuki T, Shibata H, Haga H. Predictors for functional decline among nondisabled older Japanese living in a community during a 3-year follow-up. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:1424–1429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02632.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamura Y, Ishikawa J, Fujiwara Y et al. Prevalence of frailty, cognitive impairment, and sarcopenia in outpatients with cardiometabolic disease in a frailty clinic. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0955-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura E, Miyao K, Ozeki T. Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis. Mech Ageing Dev 1988;46:1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-6374(88)90109-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubina TL, Mints AY, Zhuk EV. Biological age and its estimation. III. Introduction of a correction to the multiple regression model of biological age and assessment of biological age in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Exp Gerontol 1984;19:133–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0531-5565(84)90016-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. 9/Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986;5:165–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugishita K, Sugishita M, Hemmi I, Asada T, Tanigawa T. A validity and reliability study of the Japanese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). Clin Gerontol 2017;40:233–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:982–992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S, Collaborators Developing the Japanese Equation for Estimated GFR. GFR estimation using standardized serum cystatin C in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;61:197–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, El Nahas M, Astor BC, Matsushita K, Gansevoort RT, Kasiske BL, Eckardt KU. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report. Kidney Int 2011;80:17–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48:452–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalyani RR, Tian J, Xue QL, Walston J, Cappola AR, Fried LP, Brancati FL, Blaum CS. Hyperglycemia and incidence of frailty and lower extremity mobility limitations in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:1701–1707. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04099.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe D, Yoshida T, Watanabe Y, Yamada Y, Kimura M, Kyoto-Kameoka Study Group. A U-shaped relationship between the prevalence of frailty and body mass index in community-dwelling Japanese older adults: the Kyoto-Kameoka study. J Clin Med 2020;9:1367. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev 2013;35:51–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxs006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samper-Ternent R, Al Snih S, Raji MA, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ. Relationship between frailty and cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1845–1852. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-415.2008.01947.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raji MA, Al Snih S, Ostir GV, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ. Cognitive status and future risk of frailty in older Mexican Americans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010;65:1228–1234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glq121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Soysal P, Veronese N, Thompson T et al. Relationship between depression and frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2017;36:78–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cesari M, Azzolino D, Arosio B, Canevelli M. Nutritional interventions for early dementia. J Nutr Health Aging 2021;25:688–691. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1616-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zainab A, Pereira X. Depression in primary care, part 1: screening and diagnosis. Malays Fam Physician 2007;2:95–101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Khunti K. Serum albumin, cardiometabolic and other adverse outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of 48 published observational cohort studies involving 1,492,237 participants. Scand Cardiovasc J 2020;54:280–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2020.1762918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ronit A, Kirkegaard-Klitbo DM, Dohlmann TL, Lundgren J, Sabin CA, Phillips AN, Nordestgaard BG, Afzal S. Plasma albumin and incident cardiovascular disease: results from the CGPS and an updated meta-analysis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020;40:473–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Painter P, Marcus RL. Assessing physical function and physical activity in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:861–872. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06590712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Warraich HJ, Kitzman DW, Whellan DJ, Duncan PW, Mentz RJ, Pastva AM, Nelson MB, Upadhya B, Reeves GR. Physical function, frailty, cognition, depression, and quality of life in hospitalized adults ≥ 60 years with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e005254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all participants who agreed to join in this study. We would also like to thank Drs. S. Watanabe, A. Tachibana, K. Toyoshima, T. Omura, R. Kodera, and K. Oba of Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital for their assistance in data collection.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the translational research of Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology and Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital 2018–2019 and the Research Funding for Longevity Sciences (no. 28–30) from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Toyoshima.

Ethics declarations

This manuscript complies with the current laws regarding ethical standards in Japan, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital (#R15-20).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest associated with this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toyoshima, K., Seino, S., Tamura, Y. et al. Difference between “Physical Fitness Age” Based on Physical Function and Chronological Age Is Associated with Obesity, Hyperglycemia, Depressive Symptoms, and Low Serum Albumin. J Nutr Health Aging 26, 501–509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1786-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1786-8

Key words

Navigation