Skip to main content
Log in

Consensus on Components of Frailty Using the Delphi Method: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

The concept of frailty has been suggested to comprise physical, mental, and social phenotypes. However, there is no general consensus about the appropriate components for assessing frailty.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to reach consensus on components of frailty assessment using the Delphi process.

Methods

To achieve consensus on the definition of frailty, a modified Delphi method was used. Geriatric and gerontologic experts were selected from various fields. The detailed components of frailty were composed of data from the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. Establishing consensus and collecting opinions from experts were conducted using a modified Delphi method.

Results

Overall, nine domains with 14 components of frailty assessment were accepted. There was consensus on the necessity of a broad phenotype including physical, mental, and social frailty.

Conclusions

Consensus on the components of a frailty assessment in a clinical setting is achieved through the Delphi process to establish a new tool of frailty assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H et al. The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(1):29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS et al. The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(7):564–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim KJ, Shin J, Choi J, Won CW. Discrepancies in the Prevalence of Known Frailty Scales: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. Ann geriatr med res. 2018;22:137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen Sponselee MT, Schols JM. Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(3):175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG et al. Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;26:53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez Manas L, Féart C, Mann G et al. Searching for an Operational Definition of Frailty: A Delphi Method Based Consensus Statement: The Frailty Operative Definition-Consensus Conference Project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(1):62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Won CW, Lee S, Kim J et al. Korean frailty and aging cohort study (KFACS): cohort profile. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e035573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The delphi method: Techniques and applications. Wesley Publishing Company, 2002.

  11. Soong JT, Poots AJ, Bell D. Finding consensus on frailty assessment in acute care through Delphi method. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e012904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D. Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41(2):95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman CM. The Delphi technique: a critique. J Adv Nurs. 1987;12(6):729–734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huisingh Scheetz M, Wroblewski K, Kocherginsky M et al. The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Frailty Among U.S. Older Adults Based on Hourly Accelerometry Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(5):622–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higueras Fresnillo S, Cabanas Sanchez V, Lopez Garcia E et al. Physical Activity and Association Between Frailty and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Older Adults: Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(11):2097–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dodge BJ, Clark RE. Research on the Delphi Technique. Educational Technology. 1977;17:58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ravonne AG. The Delphi Technique in Educational Research. SAGE Open. 2014;4(2):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.J.K., J.C. was responsible for this study’s design. J.C. supervised the study and was responsible for the drafting and revising of the manuscript. J.S., J.C. approved the final manuscript. The data was obtained by K.J.K., J.C, J.S., M.K., and JW. This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korean Health Industry Development Institute (KHTDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HJ15C3153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaekyung Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest: All of the authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards: Ethics approval for this study was provided by the Institutional Review Board of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Kyung Hee University Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea (KMC IRB number: 2015-12-103).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K.J., Choi, J., Shin, J. et al. Consensus on Components of Frailty Using the Delphi Method: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. J Nutr Health Aging 25, 242–247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1523-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1523-0

Key words

Navigation