Skip to main content
Log in

Initial Validation of the Toulouse St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment in Older Adults

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Falls are one of the most prevalent health issues facing older adults. This study examines the validity of the Toulouse-St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment (TSLUMFA). Objectives were to validate the TSLUMFA by testing if it differentiates between prior non fallers (n=80) and fallers (n=23), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the gold standard Tinetti Gait and Balance Instrument (TGBI). Examine if the subset of FRAIL Scale items on the TSLUMFA distinguishes between previous non fallers (n=75) and fallers (n=20), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the TGBI. Identify TSLUMFA cut offs scores for fall risk.

Design

Prospective validation study.

Setting

Participants were ambulatory patients presenting to the SLU Geriatrics Clinic.

Participants

103 ambulatory older adults.

Measurements

Fall risk was assessed using the three assessments. Outcome measures were previous falls and follow up falls.

Results

TSLUMFA, FRAIL, and TGBI differentiated between previous fallers and non fallers. A TSLUMFA score <23 stratified patients as moderate risk (Sensitivity=0.806 Specificity=0.776) and a score <21 stratified patients as high risk (Sensitivity=0.929 Specificity=0.897). 78% of patients (n=80) participated in follow up and 20% (n=16) of these patients fell during follow up. TSLUMFA and TGBI absolute scores were lower among patients who fell during the follow up period versus non fallers but the observed differences were not statistically significant (TSLUMFA P=0.123 and TGBI P=0.074).

Conclusion

This study validated the TSLUMFA and FRAIL. No test predicted falls with statistical significance (most likely due to the low follow up participation) but a positive trend was seen. Clinical recommendations from this study are to use the FRAIL as an initial fall screen and patients scoring > 3 should be analyzed by TSLUMFA. The TSLUMFA’s advantage is that it pinpoints areas that will directly benefit from therapy to reduce falls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table 1
Table 2
Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age and Ageing. 2006;35:37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens JA. Falls among older adults -risk factors and prevention strategies. J Safety Res. 2005;36(4):409–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker SP, Harvey A. Fall injuries in the elderly. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 1985;1(3):501–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy J, Isaacs B. The post-fall syndrome. Gerontology. 1982;28(4):265–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vetter NJ, Ford D. Anxiety and depression scores in elderly fallers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 1989;4(3):159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liddle J, Gilleard C. The emotional consequences of falls for patients and their families. Age Ageing. 1994;23(Suppl 4):17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oliver D, Hopper A, Seed P. Do hospital fall prevention programs work? A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2000;48(12):1679–1689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME. The Cost and Frequency of Hospitalization for Fall-Related Injuries in Older Adults. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(7):1020–1023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi M, Hector M. Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):188 e113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron ID, Murray GR, Gillespie LD, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in nursing care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(1):CD005465.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morley JE, Rolland Y, Tolson D, Vellas B. Increasing awareness of the factors producing falls: the mini falls assessment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gokce Kutsal Y, Barak A, Atalay A, et al. Polypharmacy in the elderly: a multicenter study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(7):486–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Hofstee HM, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM, Lips P. Falls in the elderly: a prospective study of risk factors and risk profiles. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(11):1129–1136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Morley JE. A comparison of four frailty models. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):721–726.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(7):601–608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1986;34(2):119–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaught SL. Gait, balance, and fall prevention. Ochsner J. 2001;3(2):94–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Rouck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rouck, J.E., Malmstrom, T.K. & Morley, J.E. Initial Validation of the Toulouse St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment in Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging 22, 880–884 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-018-1073-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-018-1073-x

Key words

Navigation