Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of nutrient intake estimates derived using a semi-quantitative FFQ against 3 day diet records in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the relative validity of a multicultural FFQ used to derive nutrient intake estimates in a community dwelling cohort of younger and older men and women compared with those derived from 3 day (3d) diet records during the same time-frame.

Design

Cross-sectional analyses.

Setting

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) conducted in the Baltimore, MD and District of Columbia areas.

Participants

A subset (n=468, aged 26 to 95 years (y), 47% female, 65% non-Hispanic white) from the BLSA, with complete data for nutrient estimates from a FFQ and 3d diet records.

Measurements

Pearson’s correlation coefficients (energy adjusted and de-attenuated) for intakes of energy and 26 nutrients estimated from the FFQ and the mean of 3d diet records were calculated in a cross-sectional analysis. Rankings of individuals based on FFQ for various nutrient intakes were compared to corresponding rankings based on the average of the 3d diet records. Bland Altman plots were examined for a visual representation of agreement between both assessment methods. All analyses were stratified by sex and age (above and below 65 y).

Results

Median nutrient intake estimates tended to be higher from the FFQ compared to average 3d diet records. Energy adjusted and de-attenuated correlations between FFQ intake estimates and records ranged from 0.23 (sodium intake in men) to 0.81 (alcohol intake in women). The FFQ classified more than 70 percent of participants in either the same or adjacent quartile categories for all nutrients examined. Bland Altman plots demonstrated good agreement between the assessment methods for most nutrients.

Conclusion

This FFQ provides reasonably valid estimates of dietary intakes of younger and older participants of the BLSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Werner CA. The Older Population: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs, United States Census Bureau, 2011, http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shock NW, Greulich RC, Andres R, et al. Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging: NIH Publication No. 1984;84–2450 http://www.irp.nia. nih.gov/blsahistory/blsa_1984/blsa-1984.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrucci L. The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA): a 50-year-long journey and plans for the future. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63(12):1416–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires -a review. Public Health Nutr 2002;5(4):567–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cade JE, Burley VJ, Warm DL, Thompson RL, Margetts BM. Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utilisation. Nutr Res Rev 2004;17(1):5–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Staveren WA, de Groot LC, Blauw YH, van der Wielen RP. Assessing diets of elderly people: problems and approaches. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59(1 Suppl):221S–223S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Newby PK, Muller D, Hallfrisch J, Qiao N, Andres R, Tucker KL. Dietary patterns and changes in body mass index and waist circumference in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77(6):1417–1425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallfrisch J, Muller D, Drinkwater D, Tobin J, Andres R. Continuing diet trends in men: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (1961-1987). J Gerontol 1990;45(6):M186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2014. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page, http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tucker KL, Bianchi LA, Maras J, Bermudez OI. Adaptation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Puerto Rican and non-Hispanic adults. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148(5):507–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bermudez OI, Ribaya-Mercado JD, Talegawkar SA, Tucker KL. Hispanic and non-Hispanic white elders from Massachusetts have different patterns of carotenoid intake and plasma concentrations. J Nutr 2005;135(6):1496–1502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books. Champaign, IL, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shimokata H, Andres R, Coon PJ, Elahi D, Muller DC, Tobin JD. Studies in the distribution of body fat. II. Longitudinal effects of change in weight. International journal of obesity 1989;13:455–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65(4 Suppl):1220S–1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tucker KL, Hallfrisch J, Qiao N, Muller D, Andres R, Fleg JL. The combination of high fruit and vegetable and low saturated fat intakes is more protective against mortality in aging men than is either alone: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Nutr 2005;135(3):556–561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Newby PK, Muller D, Tucker KL. Associations of empirically derived eating patterns with plasma lipid biomarkers: a comparison of factor and cluster analysis methods. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(3):759–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. United States Department of Agriculture. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2005-2006 and 2007-2008 Data: Dietary Interview-Total Nutrients Intakes 2013; http:// www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=18349. Accessed 14 February 2014

  20. Erkkila AT, Jarvinen R, Karvonen H, Keronen L, Tuppurainen MT. Validation of a semi-quantitative FFQ using food records as a reference in older women in the Kuopio Fracture Prevention Study (OSTPRE-FPS). Public Health Nutr 2011;15(4):635–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klipstein-Grobusch K, den Breeijen JH, Goldbohm RA, et al. Dietary assessment in the elderly: validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52(8):588–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dumartheray EW, Krieg MA, Cornuz J, et al. Validation and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for use in elderly Swiss women. J Hum Nutr Diet 2006;19(5):321–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goris AH, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR. Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(1):130–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goris AH, Westerterp KR. Underreporting of habitual food intake is explained by undereating in highly motivated lean women. J Nutr 1999;129(4):878–882

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrell VA, Harris M, Lohman TG, et al. Comparison between dietary assessment methods for determining associations between nutrient intakes and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109(5):899–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Paalanen L, Mannisto S, Virtanen MJ, et al. Validity of a food frequency questionnaire varied by age and body mass index. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59(9):994–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135(10):1114–1126; discussion 1127-1136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luft FC, Fineberg NS, Sloan RS. Estimating dietary sodium intake in individuals receiving a randomly fluctuating intake. Hypertension 1982;4(6):805–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Day N, McKeown N, Wong M, Welch A, Bingham S. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30(2):309–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tyrovolas S, Pounis G, Bountziouka V, Polychronopoulos E, Panagiotakos DB. Repeatability and validation of a short, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire designed for older adults living in Mediterranean areas: the MEDISFFQ. J Nutr Elder 2010;29(3):311–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eysteinsdottir T, Thorsdottir I, Gunnarsdottir I, Steingrimsdottir L. Assessing validity of a short food frequency questionnaire on present dietary intake of elderly Icelanders. Nutr J 2012;11:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Munger RG, Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Kaye SA, Sellers TA. Dietary assessment of older Iowa women with a food frequency questionnaire: nutrient intake, reproducibility, and comparison with 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(2):192–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tucker KL, Chen H, Vogel S, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ, Lammi-Keefe CJ. Carotenoid intakes, assessed by dietary questionnaire, are associated with plasma carotenoid concentrations in an elderly population. J Nutr 1999;129(2):438–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell DC, Tucker KL, Maras J, et al. Relative validity of the Geisinger Rural Aging Study food frequency questionnaire. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16(7):667–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Morris MC, Tangney CC, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire by cognition in an older biracial sample. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(12):1213–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Arsenault LN, Matthan N, Scott TM, et al. Validity of estimated dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intakes determined by intervieweradministered food frequency questionnaire among older adults with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment or dementia. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170(1):95–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jia X, Craig LC, Aucott LS, Milne AC, McNeill G. Repeatability and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in free-living older people in relation to cognitive function. J Nutr Health Aging 2008;12(10):735–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Craik FI, McDowd JM. Age differences in recall and recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn 1987;13(3):474–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Dietary assessment methodology. San Diego, CA California Academic Press, 2001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Sahni S, Forrester JE, Tucker K. Assessing dietary intake of drug-abusing Hispanic adults with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107(6):968–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sameera A. Talegawkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talegawkar, S.A., Tanaka, T., Maras, J.E. et al. Validation of nutrient intake estimates derived using a semi-quantitative FFQ against 3 day diet records in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 994–1002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0659-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0659-9

Key words

Navigation