Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive frailty: What is still missing?

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

In recent years, the complex relationship between frailty and cognitive functioning has been increasingly investigated. Accordingly, the concept of “cognitive frailty” was recently proposed to describe a clinical condition characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of both physical frailty and cognitive impairment, in absence of overt dementia diagnosis or underlying neurological conditions. This novel construct has several elements of novelty and may delineate a promising target for preventive and therapeutic actions against age-related conditions. In the present paper we discuss the main issues that are still limiting the clinical and research implementation of the cognitive frailty construct. In particular, a) how to operationalize its definition; b) the supporting epidemiological data; and c) the underlying clinical and biological characteristics constitute points that need to be addressed and clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cesari M, Vellas B, Gambassi G. The stress of aging. Exp Gerontol 2013;48(4):451–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féart C, Mann G, Viña J, Chatterji S, Chodzko-Zajko W, et al. Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68(1):62–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013;381(9868):752–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14(6):392–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56(3):M146–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16(7):601–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Canevelli M, Troili F, Bruno G. Reasoning about frailty in neurology: neurobiological correlates and clinical perspectives. J Frailty Aging 2014;3(1):18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson DA, Savva GM, Kenny RA. Frailty and cognitive impairment-A review of the evidence and causal mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev 2013;12(4):840–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Giannini M, Seripa D, Pilotto A, Logroscino G. Nutrition, frailty, and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:221.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Canevelli M, Cesari M, van Kan GA. Frailty and cognitive decline: how do they relate? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2015;18(1):43–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, Abellan van Kan G, Ousset P-J, Gillette-Guyonnet S, et al. Cognitive frailty: Rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) International Consensus Group. J Nutr Health Aging 2013;17(9):726–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993;43(11):2412–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cesari M, Gambassi G, van Kan GA, Vellas B. The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes. Age Ageing 2014;43(1):10–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganguli M, Fu B, Snitz BE, Hughes TF, Chang C-CH. Mild cognitive impairment: incidence and vascular risk factors in a population-based cohort. Neurology 2013;80(23):2112–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58(3):397–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, et al. Combined prevalence of frailty and mild cognitive impairment in a population of elderly Japanese people. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14(7):518–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Halloran AM, Finucane C, Savva GM, Robertson IH, Kenny RA. Sustained attention and frailty in the older adult population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2014;69(2):147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Canevelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Canevelli, M., Cesari, M. Cognitive frailty: What is still missing?. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 273–275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0464-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0464-5

Key words

Navigation