Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Older adults are the most rapidly growing age group in the United States, and it is estimated that 22.2% of U.S. adults over 71 years of age have cognitive impairments without dementia and 13.9% have dementia. Cognitive impairment is associated with reduced quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, inability to live independently, and increased health care costs; therefore, identification of modifiable risk factors for prevention and delay of cognitive decline is of increasing importance. There is a growing body of research and interest in the relationship between diet and cognitive function. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cognitive function may be improved and cognitive decline prevented as a function of a particular nutrient, food group or dietary pattern; however, results from these trials have failed to be replicated in randomized controlled trials. One possible reason for the equivocality of findings in the diet and cognitive function literature may be the methodological issues and limitations in the assessment of dietary patterns and nutritional intake. Self-reported dietary data can be biased by many factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and education; yet, there is limited research on the impact of cognitive function on the integrity of self-reported dietary data. Cognitive function itself may bias diet assessment methods, subsequently obscuring the evaluation of the nutrition-cognition relationship. The present review summarizes methodological validation studies that provide insight into potential errors of diet assessment methods due to cognitive function, identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for improving diet assessment accuracy in studies of individuals with cognitive impairments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Older Americans 2012: Key Indicators of Well-Being. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment without Dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:427–434.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: The aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology 2007;29:125–132.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillette Guyonnet S, Abellan Van Kan G, Andrieu S, Barberger Gateau P, Berr C, Bonnefoy M, et al. Iana task force on nutrition and cognitive decline with aging. J Nutr Health Aging 2007;11:132–152.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s and Dementia 2007;3:186–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sydenham E, Dangour AD, Lim WS. Omega 3 fatty acid for the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 6:CD005379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005379.pub3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balk E, Raman G, Tatsioni A, Chung M, Lau J, Rosenberg IH. Vitamin B6, B12, and Folic Acid Supplementation and Cognitive Function. A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Park DC. Human neuroscience and the aging mind: A new look at old problems. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010;65:405–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Chapter 1 — dietary assessment methodology. In: Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease (third edition),Edited by Ann M. Coulston, Carol J. Boushey, Mario G. Ferruzzi. Academic Press, 2013;5–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolar A, P., Kolar AS, Patterson RE, White E, Neuhouser ML, et al. A practical method for collecting 3-day food records in a large cohort. Epidemiology 2005;16:579–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Requejo AM, Ortega RM, Robles F, Navia B, Faci M, Aparicio A. Influence of nutrition on cognitive function in a group of elderly, independently living people. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:S54–S57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velho S, Marques-Vidal P, Baptista F, Camilo ME. Dietary intake adequacy and cognitive function in free-living active elderly: A cross-sectional and short-term prospective study. Clin Nutr 2008;27:77–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Best T, Kemps E, Bryan J. A role for dietary saccharide intake in cognitive performance. Nutr Neurosci 2007;10:113–120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Titova OE, Ax E, Brooks SJ, Sjögren P, Cederholm T, Kilander L, et al. Mediterranean diet habits in older individuals: Associations with cognitive functioning and brain volumes. Exp Gerontol 2013;48:1443–1448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, Murayi T, Clemens JC, Rumpler WV, et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:324–332.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Key Concepts about NHANES Dietary Data Collection. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/dietary/SurveyOrientation/DietaryDataOverview/Info2.htm. Accessed 9 December 2013.

  17. Lee L, Kang SA, Lee HO, Lee B, Park JS, Kim J, et al. Relationships between dietary intake and cognitive function level in Korean elderly people. Public Health (Nature) 2001;115:133–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hercberg S, Preziosi P, Briançon S, Galan P, Triol I, Malvy D, et al. A Primary Prevention Trial Using Nutritional Doses of Antioxidant Vitamins and Minerals in Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancers in a General Population: The SU.VI.MAX Study—Design, Methods, and Participant Characteristics. Control Clin Trials 1998;19:336–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kesse-Guyot E, Andreeva VA, Ducros V, Jeandel C, Julia C, Hercberg S, et al. Carotenoid-rich dietary patterns during midlife and subsequent cognitive function. Br J Nutr FirstView: 2013;1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kesse-Guyot E, Fezeu L, Andreeva VA, Touvier M, Scalbert A, Hercberg S, et al. Total and Specific Polyphenol Intakes in Midlife Are Associated with Cognitive Function Measured 13 Years Later. J Nutr 2012;142:76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Péneau S, Galan P, Jeandel C, Ferry M, Andreeva V, Hercberg S, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive function in the SU.VI.MAX 2 prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:1295–1303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kesse-Guyot E, Andreeva VA, Jeandel C, Ferry M, Hercberg S, Galan P. A Healthy Dietary Pattern at Midlife Is Associated with Subsequent Cognitive Performance. J Nutr 2012;142:909–915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:453–469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:51–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Hurwitz P, McNutt S, et al. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires: The Eating at America’s Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:1089–1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Solfrizzi V, Panza F, Frisardi V, Seripa D, Logroscino G, Imbimbo B, et al: (2011) Diet and Alzheimer’s disease risk factors or prevention: the current evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 2011;11:677–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jenab M. Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons. Hum Genet 2009;125:507–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lloyd, A J Fave, G Beckmann, M Lin, W Tailliart, K Xie, L Mathers, J C Draper, J. Use of mass spectrometry fingerprinting to identify urinary metabolites after consumption of specific foods. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:981–991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heinzmann SS, Brown IJ, Chan Q, Bictash M, Dumas M-, Kochhar S, et al. Metabolic profiling strategy for discovery of nutritional biomarkers: Proline betaine as a marker of citrus consumption. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:436–443.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Sullivan A, Gibney MJ, Brennan L. Dietary intake patterns are reflected in metabolomic profiles: potential role in dietary assessment studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:314–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bouchard-Mercier A, Rudkowska I, Lemieux S, Couture P, Vohl MC. The metabolic signature associated with the Western dietary pattern: A cross-sectional study. Nutrition Journal 2013;12:158.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dullemeijer C, Durga J, Brouwer IA, Van De Rest O, Kok FJ, Brummer R-M, et al. n-3 Fatty acid proportions in plasma and cognitive performance in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:1479–1485.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heude B, Ducimetière P, Berr C. Cognitive decline and fatty acid composition of erythrocyte membranes—The EVA Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:803–808.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowman, G L Silbert, L C Howieson, D Dodge, H H Traber, M G Frei, B Kaye, J A Shannon, J Quinn, JF. Nutrient biomarker patterns, cognitive function, and MRI measures of brain aging. Neurology 2012;78:241–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Friedenreich CM, Slimani N, Riboli E. Measurement of Past Diet: Review of Previous and Proposed Methods. Epidemiol Rev 1992;14:177–196.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith AF. Cognitive processes in long-term dietary recall. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1991;6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith AF, Jobe JB, Mingay DJ. Retrieval from Memory of Dietary Information. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991;5:269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haraldsdottir J, Jonneland AT, Overvad K. Validity of individual portion size estimates in a food frequency questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23:787–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, Bingham S, et al. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1054–1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bartali B, Turrini A, Salvini S, Lauretani F, Russo C, Corsi A, et al. Dietary intake estimated using different methods in two Italian older populations. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2004;38:51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Staveren WA, de Groot LC, Blauw Y, van der Wielen R. Assessing diets of elderly people: Problems and approaches. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59:221S–223S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. de Vries J, de Groot L, van Staveren W. Dietary assessment in elderly people: experiences gained from studies in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009;63:S69–S74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Morris MC, Colditz GA, Evans DA. Response to a Mail Nutritional Survey in an Older Bi-Racial Community Population. Ann Epidemiol 1998;8:342–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Morris MC, Tangney CC, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS. Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire by Cognition in an Older Biracial Sample. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:1213–1217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. «Mini-mental state». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Arsenault LN, Matthan N, Scott TM, Dallal G, Lichtenstein AH, Folstein MF, et al. Validity of Estimated Dietary Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid Intakes Determined by Interviewer-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Older Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:95–103.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Poslusna K, Ruprich J, de Vries J, Jakubikova M, van’t Veer P. Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. Br J Nutr 101 Suppl 2009;2:S73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Westerterp KR, Goris AHC. Validity of the assessment of dietary intake: Problems of misreporting. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2002;5:489–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pope SK, Kritchevsky SB, Morris MC, Block G, Tylavsky FA, Lee JS, et al. Cognitive ability is associated with suspected reporting errors on food frequency questionnaires. J Nutr Health Aging 2007;11:55–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jia X, Craig LCA, Aucott LS, Milne AC, McNeill G. Repeatability and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in free-living older people in relation to cognitive function. J Nutr Health Aging 2008;12:735–741.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bowman GL, Shannon J, Ho E, Traber MG, Frei B, Oken BS, et al. Reliability and validity of food frequency questionnaire and nutrient biomarkers in elders with and without mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2011;25:49–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Klipstein-Grobusch K, Den Breeijen JH, Goldbohm RA, Geleijnse JM, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, et al. Dietary assessment in the elderly: Validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:588–596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Subar A. Improving food frequency questionnaires: A qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:781–788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, Shumakovich M, Freedman LS, Thompson FE, et al. Taking Advantage of the Strengths of 2 Different Dietary Assessment Instruments to Improve Intake Estimates for Nutritional Epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2012;175:340–347.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, Van Horn L, Beresford SAA, Caan B, et al. Evaluation and Comparison of Food Records, Recalls, and Frequencies for Energy and Protein Assessment by Using Recovery Biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol 2011;174:591–603.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Prentice R, Huang Y, Tinker L, Beresford S, Lampe J, Neuhouser M, et al. Statistical Aspects of the Use of Biomarkers in Nutritional Epidemiology Research. Stat Biosci 2009;1:112–123.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Prentice RL, Tinker LF, Huang Y, Neuhouser ML. Calibration of Self-Reported Dietary Measures Using Biomarkers: An Approach to Enhancing Nutritional Epidemiology Reliability. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013;15:353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Haubrock J, Nöthlings U, Volatier J-, Dekkers A, Ocké M, Harttig U, et al. Estimating usual food intake distributions by using the multiple source method in the EPIC-Potsdam calibration study. J Nutr 2011;141:914–920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Illner A, Freisling H, Boeing H, Huybrechts I, Crispim S, Slimani N. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology 2012;41:1187–1203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Falomir Z, Arregui M, Madueño F, Corella D, Coltell Ó. Automation of Food Questionnaires in Medical Studies: A state-of-the-art review and future prospects. Comput Biol Med 2012;42:964–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ngo J, Engelen A, Molag M, Roesle J, García-Segovia P, Serra-Majem L. A review of the use of information and communication technologies for dietary assessment. Br J Nutr 2009;101:S102–S112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kristal AR, Peters U, Potter JD. Is It Time to Abandon the Food Frequency Questionnaire? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2826–2828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA

    Krystle Zuniga & E. McAuley

  2. Nutrition and Foods, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA

    Krystle Zuniga

Authors
  1. Krystle Zuniga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. McAuley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystle Zuniga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuniga, K., McAuley, E. Considerations in selection of diet assessment methods for examining the effect of nutrition on cognition. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 333–340 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0566-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0566-5

Key words

Search

Navigation