Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Screening for frailty in elderly subjects living at home: Validation of the modified Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) instrument

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To validate the modified version of the Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) frailty instrument in elderly people living at home.

Design

Longitudinal, prospective, multicentre study.

Setting

Four departments (Ardennes, Marne, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Meuse) in two French Regions (Champagne-Ardenne and Lorraine).

Participants

Subjects aged 65 years or more, living at home, who could read and understand French, with a degree of autonomy corresponding to groups 5, or 6 in the AGGIR autonomy evaluation scale.

Measurements

Assessment included demographic characteristics, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and the SEGAm instrument. Psychometric validation was used to study feasibility and acceptability, internal structure validity, reliability, and discriminant validity of the SEGAm instrument.

Results

Between July 1st 2012 and March 31st 2013, 167 patients were included in the study. Averaged age was 77±7 years, the majority were women (70.7%). Feasibility and acceptability of the SEGAm instrument were excellent: we observed no refusal to participate, no drop-out during administration, no missing items, no ceiling or floor effects, and the administration time was short (5.0±3.5 min). By factor analysis, the instrument proved to be unidimensional. It showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.68) and good test-retest (intra-class correlation: 0.88) at 7 days interval. Discriminant validity showed a significant difference, mainly for nutritional status, fall risk, dependency, mood and depression risk, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

Based on these psychometric properties, the SEGAm appears to be an easy-to-use instrument that is particularly suitable for use in the community to identify frail elderly people who could benefit from early targeted interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, Chaves P, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women’s health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:262–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dramé M, Jovenin N, Ankri J, Somme D, Novella J-L, Gauvain J-B, et al. [The frailty in the elderly: Actuality-Prospects]. Gerontol Soc. 2004;109:31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morley JE, Haren MT, Rolland Y, Kim MJ. Frailty. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90:837–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:991–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, MacKnight C, McDowell I, Hebert R, Hogan DB. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 1999;353:205–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Chung M, Goldstein MK, Dominguez F, Jr., Vallone R. Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:778–784.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santos-Eggimann B, Cuenoud P, Spagnoli J, Junod J. Prevalence of frailty in middleaged and older community-dwelling Europeans living in 10 countries. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:675–681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–1492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal N, Acevedo F, Leighton LS, Cayten CG, Pitchumoni CS. Predictive ability of various nutritional variables for mortality in elderly people. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:1173–1178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Speechley M, Tinetti M. Falls and injuries in frail and vigorous community elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:46–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, Morley JE, Kritchevsky SB, Vellas B. The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, Fink HA, Cawthon PM, Stone KL, et al. Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:382–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoevaerdts D, Biettlot S, Malhomme B, Rezette C, Gillet JB, Vanpee D, et al. Identification précoce du profil gériatrique en salle d’urgences: présentation de la grille SEGA. Revue Geriatr. 2004;29:169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Condé FM, Sornay-Soares C, Mactoux V, Mathieu J, Bohatier J, Yennoune A, et al Role and place of the geriatrician in the oncology of elderly subjects. Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 2007;7:216–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vetel J-M. Le logiciel AGGIR. Rev Hosp France. 1995:108.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993;269:2386–2391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clement JP, Nassif RF, Leger JM, Marchan F. [Development and contribution to the validation of a brief French version of the Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale]. Encephale. 1997;23:91–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Ath P, Katona P, Mullan E, Evans S, Katona C. Screening, detection and management of depression in elderly primary care attenders. I: The acceptability and performance of the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the development of short versions. Fam Pract. 1994;11:260–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salva A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M366–M372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN. An investigation of nursing problems in hospitals. New-York: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Katz S, Akpom CA. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6:493–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vellas BJ, Wayne SJ, Romero L, Baumgartner RN, Rubenstein LZ, Garry PJ. Oneleg balance is an important predictor of injurious falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:735–738.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Falissard B. Mesurer la subjectivité en santé: Perspective méthodologique et statistique. 2nd ed. Herstal (Belgium): Masson; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1:245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwan CW, Fung WK. Influence curves for factor loadings. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2005;58:345–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56:81–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cronbach LJ. Test reliability; its meaning and determination. Psychometrika. 1947;12:1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New-York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11:344–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bielderman A, van der Schans CP, van Lieshout MR, de Greef MH, Boersma F, Krijnen WP, Steverink N. Multidimensional structure of the Groningen frailty indicator in community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:86.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Trivalle C. Le syndrome de fragilité en gériatrie. Med Hygiene. 2000:2312–2317.

    Google Scholar 

  39. De Witte N, Gobbens R, De Donder L, Dury S, Buffel T, Schols J, Verte D. The comprehensive frailty assessment instrument: development, validity and reliability. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34:274–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research and Innovation, Reims Teaching Hospitals, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims, F-51092, France

    N. Oubaya, D. Jolly & Moustapha Dramé

  2. Faculty of Medicine, E.A 3797, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, F-51095, France

    R. Mahmoudi, D. Jolly, P. Nazeyrollas, J. -L. Novella & Moustapha Dramé

  3. Maison Blanche Hospital, Department of Clinical Gerontology, Reims Teaching Hospitals, Reims, F-51092, France

    R. Mahmoudi, A. -A. Zulfiqar & J. -L. Novella

  4. Department of Palliative Care, Hospital of Troyes, Troyes, F-10003, France

    E. Quignard

  5. Caisse d’assurance retraite et de santé au travail du Nord-Est, Mission RELAIS - Actions collectives gérontologiques, Nancy, F-54000, France

    C. Cunin

  6. Department of Cardiology, Reims Teaching Hospitals, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims, F-51092, France

    P. Nazeyrollas

Authors
  1. N. Oubaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Mahmoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Jolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. -A. Zulfiqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Quignard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Cunin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. Nazeyrollas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. -L. Novella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Moustapha Dramé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moustapha Dramé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oubaya, N., Mahmoudi, R., Jolly, D. et al. Screening for frailty in elderly subjects living at home: Validation of the modified Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) instrument. J Nutr Health Aging 18, 757–764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0541-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0541-1

Key words

Search

Navigation