Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing measures of fat-free mass in overweight older adults using three different bioelectrical impedance devices and three prediction equations

  • Body Composition by Three Bia Devices
  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To compare measures of fat-free mass (FFM) by three different bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices and to assess the agreement between three different equations validated in older adult and/or overweight populations.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Orthopaedics ward of Brisbane public hospital, Australia.

Participants

Twenty-two overweight, older Australians (72 yr ± 6.4, BMI 34 kg/m2 ± 5.5) with knee osteoarthritis.

Measurements

Body composition was measured using three BIA devices: Tanita 300-GS (foot-to-foot), Impedimed DF50 (hand-to-foot) and Impedimed SFB7 (bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS)). Three equations for predicting FFM were selected based on their ability to be applied to an older adult and/ or overweight population. Impedance values were extracted from the hand-to-foot BIA device and included in the equations to estimate FFM.

Results

The mean FFM measured by BIS (57.6 kg ± 9.1) differed significantly from those measured by foot-to-foot (54.6 kg ± 8.7) and hand-to-foot BIA (53.2 kg ± 10.5) (P < 0.001). The mean ± SD FFM predicted by three equations using raw data from hand-to-foot BIA were 54.7 kg ± 8.9, 54.7 kg ± 7.9 and 52.9 kg ± 11.05 respectively. These results did not differ from the FFM predicted by the hand-to-foot device (F = 2.66, P = 0.118).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that foot-to-foot and hand-to-foot BIA may be used interchangeably in overweight older adults at the group level but due to the large limits of agreement may lead to unacceptable error in individuals. There was no difference between the three prediction equations however these results should be confirmed within a larger sample and against a reference standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ricciardi, R. and L.A. Talbot, Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis in the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of overweight and obesity. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2007. 19(5): p. 235–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stallmann-Jorgensen, I.S., et al., General and visceral adiposity in black and white adolescents and their relation with reported physical activity and diet. International Journal of Obesity, 2007. 31(4): p. 622–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Remsberg, K.E. and R.M. Siervogel, A life span approach to cardiovascular disease risk and aging: the Fels Longitudinal Study. Mechanisms Of Ageing And Development, 2003. 124(3): p. 249–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchholz, A., C. Bartok, and D. Schoeller, The validity of bioelectrical impedance models in clinical populations. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 2004. 19(5): p. 433–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guida, B., et al., Bioelectrical impedance analysis and age-related differences of body composition in the elderly. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 2007. 17: p. 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyle, U.G., et al., Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2004. 23(6): p. 1430–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lasser, S., et al., Evaluation of two foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysers to assess body composition in overweight and obese adolescents. British Journal of Nutrition, 2003. 90: p. 987–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Demura, S., S. Sato, and T. Kitabayashi, Percentage of total body fat as estimated by three automatic bioelectrical impedance analyzers. Journal Of Physiological Anthropology And Applied Human Science, 2004. 23(3): p. 93–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbosa-Silva, M.C.G. and A.s.J.D. Barros, Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Current Opinion In Clinical Nutrition And Metabolic Care, 2005. 8(3): p. 311–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heymsfield, S., et al., Techniques used in the measurement of body composition: an overview with emphasis on bioelectrical impedance analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1996. 64(3S): p. 478S–484.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyle, U.G., et al., Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2004. 23(5): p. 1226–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyle, U.G., et al., Single prediction equation for bioelectrical impedance analysis in adults aged 20–94 years. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2001. 17(3): p. 248–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roubenoff, R., et al., Application of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Elderly Populations. The Journals of Gerontology, 1997. 52A(3): p. M129–M136.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dey, D.K. and I. Bosaeus, Comparison of bioelectrical impedance prediction equations for fat-free mass in a population-based sample of 75 y olds:: The NORA study. Nutrition, 2003. 19(10): p. 858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coppini, L., D. Waitzberg, and A. Campos, Limitations and validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in morbidly obese patients. Current Opinion In Clinical Nutrition And Metabolic Care, 2005. 8: p. 329–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Segal, K.R., et al., Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a foursite cross-validation study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1988. 47(7): p. 7–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ward, L.C., et al. Constancy of resistivity coefficients for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). in 8th International Symposium on In Vitro Body Composition Studies. 2008. New York, USA [Abstract].

  18. Bland, J.M. and D.G. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986. 1(8476): p. 307–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ritchie, J., C. Miller, and H. Smiciklas-Wright, Tanita Foot-to-Foot Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis System Validated in Older Adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2005. 105: p. 11617–11619.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Isenring, E., et al., Evaluation of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis for the prediction of total body water in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2004. 58(1): p. 46–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolanowski, M. and B.E. Nilsson, Assessment of human body composition using dualenergy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal Of Experimental And Clinical Research, 2001. 7(5): p. 1029–1033.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Varady, K.A., S. Santosa, and P.J.H. Jones, Validation of hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of body composition in overweight women. American Journal Of Human Biology: The Official Journal Of The Human Biology Council, 2007. 19(3): p. 429–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon, J., et al., Total body water estimations in healthy men and women using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison. Nutrition and Metabolism, 2008. 5(7).

  24. Tengvall, M., et al., Body composition in the elderly: Reference values and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy to predict total body skeletal muscle mass. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2008: p. 1–7.

  25. Isenring, E., S. Capra, and J. Bauer, Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. British Journal of Cancer, 2004. 91: p. 447–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barber, M., et al., Fish oil enriched nutritional supplement attenuates progression of the acute-phase response in weight-losing patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Journal of Nutrition, 1999a. 129: p. 1120–1125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barber, M., et al., The effect of an oral nutritional supplement enriched with fish oil on weightloss in patients with pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 1999b. 81: p. 80–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Ramsey.

Additional information

RR was the primary data collector and main author of the manuscript and assisted in statistical analysis and interpretation as part of the requirements for a Bachelor of Health Science (Honours). EI initiated and supervised the project and assisted in data analysis and interpretation and in writing the manuscript. LD initiated and supervised the project and assisted in writing the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsey, R., Isenring, E. & Daniels, L. Comparing measures of fat-free mass in overweight older adults using three different bioelectrical impedance devices and three prediction equations. J Nutr Health Aging 16, 26–30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-011-0085-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-011-0085-6

Key words

Navigation