Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments

  • Quality of Life in Older People
  • Published:
JNHA - The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging

Abstract

Objective

This study used the Brief Version of The World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) to assess and compare the quality of life in older people who live at home and older people who live in public assisted-living facilities for the elderly.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Data were collected by a research nurse in each home and in the assisted living facility.

Participants

Participants were 60 years old and older. The sample included 37 people who were living in a public assisted-living facility and 37 elderly people living in their own homes.

Measurement

The WHOQOL-BREF was used to measure participants’ quality of life.

Results

The groups were similar according to gender, literacy, existence of chronic diseases, and general perceived health. However, quality of life scores for social relationships and environment domains were lower in those living in an assisted living facility than those living in their own homes. The scores for elderly females staying in the assisted living facility were lower compared to the scores of males in the facility.

Conclusion

The results suggest that social and environmental domains of life quality are low in elderly assisted living facilities. Social activities should be diversified for elderly people staying in assisted living facilities to improve social relationships. Physical and psychological health of females in assisted living facilities should be comprehensively supported by professionals. Alternatively, elderly people may be professionally supported to live in their own homes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meeberg GA. Quality of life: A concept analysis. J Advan Nurs 1993;18:32–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edlund M, Tancredi LR. Quality of life: An ideological critique. Perspect Biol Med 1985;28:591–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. JAMA 1994;272:619–626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The WHOQOL Group. Study Protocol for the World Health Organization project develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993;2:153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of life Assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1403–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowling A, Banister D, Sutton S, Evans O, Windsor J. A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging & Mental Health 2002;6:355–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993;2:369–395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wann-Hansson C, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Klevsgard R. A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes (online) 2004;2:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang XT, Li LY, Wang SL, Mu XL, Wang MZ, Song W. Improvements in quality of life and disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. Chin Med J (Engl). 2005 Oct 5;118(19):1661–1664.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Carroll RE, Smith K, Couston M, Cossar JA, et al. A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 2000;9:121–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Australian WHOQOL-BREF. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.acpmh.unimelb.edu.au/whoqol/whoqol-bref-contents.html

  13. Hsiung PC, Fang CT, Chang YY, Chen MY, Wang JD. Comparison of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection. Qual Life Res 2005;14:141–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dündar P, Fidaner C, Fidaner H, Oral A, Eser S, Atman UC, Pala T. Comparing the Turkish versions of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36: Convergent validity of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36. Hippokratia 2002;6(Suppl. 1):37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin MR, Huang W, Huang C, Hwang HF, Tsai LW, Chiu YN. The impact of the Chi-Chi earthquake on quality of life among elderly survivors in Taiwan- a before and after study. Qual Life Res 2002;11:379–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Skewington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skewington SM. Measuring quality of life in Britain: Introducing the WHOQOL-100. J Psychosom Res 1999;47:449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fidaner H, Elbi H, Fidaner C, Eser SY, Eser E. WHOQOL-100 ve WHOQOL-BREF’in psikometrik özellikleri. 3P Derg 1999;7:23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Phungrassami T, Katikarn R, Watanaarepornchai S, Sangtawan D. Quality of life assessment in radiotherapy patients by WHOQOL-BREF-THAI: a feasibility study. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:1459–1465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsiung PC, Fang CT, Chang YY, Chen MY, Wang JD. Comparison of WHOQOL-bREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection. Qual Life Res 2005;14:141–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang Y, Hsieh CL, Wang YH, Wu YH. A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1890–1895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sosyal Hizmetler ve Çocuk Esirgeme Kurumu Genel Müdürlü ü Kayıtları 2001, http://www.shcek.gov.tr/dosyalar/yasli_hizm/shcek_huzurevleri.htm

  24. Fassino S, Leombruni P, Daga GA, Brustolin A, Rovera GG, Fabris F. Quality of life in dependent older adults living at home. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002;35:9–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellström Y, Hallberg IR. Perspectives of elderly people receiving home help on health, care and quality of life. Health Soc Care Community 2001;9:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A Profile of Older Americans: 2004. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/general/profile_2004.pdf

  27. Kane RL, Ouslander JG, Abrass IB. Essentials of clinical geriatrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Prof.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang HF, Liang WM, Chiu YN, Lin MR. Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age Ageing 2003;32:593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Gao L, Zhang H, Zhao C, Shen Y, Shinfuku N. Post-earthquake quality of life and psychological well-being: longitudinal evaluation in a rural community sample in northern China. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000;54:427–433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Skevington SM. Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life, using the WHOQOL. Pain 1998;76:395–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. The Ministry of Health of Turkey. Turkey health report 2004. Ankara: School of Public Health; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

    Said Bodur

  2. Department of Public Health Nursing, College of Health, Selcuk University, Karaman, Turkey

    D. Dayanir Cingil

  3. Selcuk Universitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sagligi Anabilim Dalı, 42080, Konya, Turkey

    Said Bodur

Authors
  1. Said Bodur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Dayanir Cingil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Said Bodur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bodur, S., Dayanir Cingil, D. Using WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate quality of life among Turkish elders in different residential environments. J Nutr Health Aging 13, 652–656 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0177-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0177-8

Key words

Search

Navigation