Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the passive sampler and biomonitoring of organic pollutants in water: A laboratory study

  • Article
  • Published:
Ocean Science Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Passive sampling could provide the solution to problems associated with costly and time consuming sampling programmes and biomonitoring. Mussels (Mytilus edulis) and Chemcatcher passive sampler were simultaneously analyzed for sequestered pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MSD). The Chemcatcher passive sampler based on a solid phase extraction disc with two types of diffusion-limiting membranes (polyethelene and polysulphone), were also compared. Diuron, atrazine, irgarol and lindane were accumulated in the polysulphone passive sampler in greater concentration than in the mussels or in the other passive samplers with polyethelene limiting-membrane. Mussels can accumulate in their tissue high concentration of non polar compounds such as PCB 52, dieldren and PCB 153; more than the passive sampler with polysulphone membrane. The device with polyethelene limiting membrane has high affinity capacity to concentrate high amount of phenenthrene, dieldrin, PCB 153 and PCB 52, so it acts as a sampler for non-polar compounds. The highest uptake rate of hydrophobic compounds by Chemcatcher was observed for analytes with log octanol-water partition coefficient (KOW) between 4.5 and 7.5. Laboratory-based studies using passive samplers to assess the potential for bioaccumulation could provide robust and reliable information at relatively low cost compared to biomonitoring data. Laboratory data obtained using passive samplers could be related to accumulation under field conditions where field assessments are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez DA, Petty JD, Huckins JN, Jones-Lepp TL, Getting DT, Goddard JP, Manahan SE (2004) Development of a passive, in situ, integrative sampler for hydrophilic organic contaminants in aquatic environments. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1640–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist P-A, Strandberg B, Ekelund R, Rappe C, Granmo A (1998) Temporal monitoring of organochlorine compounds in seawater by semipermeable membranes following a flooding episode in Western Europe. Environ Sci Technol 32:3887–3892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmaster DE, Menzie CA, Freshman JS, Burris JA, Maxwell NI, Drew SR (1991) Assessment of methods for estimating aquatic hazards at superfund-type sites: a cautionary tale. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:827–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis GE, Huckins JN, Rostad CE, Schmitt CJ, Petty JD, MacCarthy P (1995) Evaluation of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring organochlorine contaminants in the upper Mississippi River. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1875–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shenawy NS, Greenwood R, Abdel-Nabi IM (2007) Histological responses of marine mussel; Mytilus edulis to long-term exposure to sublethal-level of lindane and atrazine. Acta Zool Sinica 53(5):899–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Mills GA, Roig B (2007) Introduction to emerging tools and their use in water monitoring. Trends in Analy Chem 26(4):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Mills GA, Vrana B (2009) Review: Potential applications of passive sampling for monitoring non-polar industrial pollutants in the aqueous environment in support of REACH. J Chromatog A 1216:631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herve S, Paukku R, Paasivirta J, Heinonen P, Sodergren A (1991) Uptake of organochlorines from lake water by hexane-filled dialysis membranes and by mussels. Chemosphere 22:997–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofelt C, Shea D (1997) Accumulation of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs by semipermeable membrane devices and Mytilus edulis in New Bedford Harbor. Environ Sci Technol 31:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckins JN, Tubergen MW, Manuweera GK (1990) Semipermeable membrane devices containing model lipid: a new approach to monitoring the bioavailability of lipophilic contaminants and estimating their bioconcentration potential. Chemosphere 20:533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckins JN, Manuweera GK, Petty JD, Mackay D, Lebo JA (1993) Lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring organic contaminants in water. Environ Sci Technol 27:2489–2496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GD (1991) Hexane-filled dialysis bags for monitoring organic contaminants in water. Environ Sci Technol 255:1897–1903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston JK, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Morrison GM, Persson BL (2000) Development of novel passive sampling system for the timeaveraged measurement of a range of organic pollutants in aquatic environments. J Environ Monitor 2:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koester CJ, Simonich SL, Esser BK (2003) Environmental analysis. Analytical Chemistry 75:2813–2829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebo JA, Gale RW, Petty JD, Tillitt DE, Huckins JN, Meadows J, Orazio CE, Echols KR, Schroeder DJ (1995) Use of the semipermeable membrane device as an in situ sampler of waterborne bioavailable PCDD and PCDF residues at subpartsper-quadrillion concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 29: 2886–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebo JA, Zajicek JL, Huckins JN, Petty JD and Peterman PH (1992) Use of semipermeable membrane devices for in situ monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aquatic environments. Chemosphere 25:697–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litten S, Mead B, Hassett J (1993) Application of passive samplers (PISCES) to locating a source of PCBs on the Black River, New York. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namiesnik J, Zabiega B, Kot-Wasik A, Partyka M, Wasik A (2005) Passive sampling and/or extraction techniques in environmental analysis: a review. Analyt Bioanaly Chem 381:279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SM, Apte SC, Batley GE, Coade C (1995) Passive sampling for chlorinated pesticides in estuarine waters. Chem Spec Bioavail 7:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty JD, Huckins JN, Martin DB, Adornato TG (1995) Use of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDS) to determine bioavailable organochlorine pesticide residues in streams receiving irrigation drainwater. Chemosphere 30:1891–1903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaliunas D and Sodergren, A (1997) Use of semi-permeable membrane devices to monitor pollutants in water and assess their effects: a laboratory test and field verification. Environ Pollut 96:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodergren A (1987) Solvent-filled dialysismembranes simulate uptake of pollutants by aquatic organisms. Environ Sci Technol 21:855–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuer-Lauridsen F (2005) Review of passive accumulation devices for monitoring organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment. Environ Poll 136:503–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaar HJM, Busser FJM, Hermens JLM (1995) Surrogate parameter for the baseline toxicity content of contaminated water: simulating the bioconcentration of mixtures of pollutants and counting molecules. Environ Sci Technol 29:726–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Mills GA, Allan IJ, Dominiak E, Svensson K, Knutsson J, Morrison G, Greenwood R, (2005a) Passive sampling techniques for monitoring of pollutants in water. Trends Analyt Chem 24:845–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, B., Mills, G.A., Dominiak E., Greenwood R. (2006) Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of priority organic pollutants in water. Environ Pollu 142:333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Mills G, Greenwood R, Knutsson J, Svensson K, Morrison G (2005b) Performance optimization of a passive sampler for monitoring hydrophobic organic pollutants in water. J Environ Monitor 7:612–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana B, Popp P, Paschke A, Schuurmann G (2001) Membrane-enclosed sorptive coating. An integrative passive sampler for monitoring organic contaminants in water. Analy Chem 73: 5191–5200

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nahla S. El-Shenawy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Shenawy, N.S., Greenwood, R., Abdel-Nabi, I.M. et al. Comparing the passive sampler and biomonitoring of organic pollutants in water: A laboratory study. Ocean Sci. J. 44, 69–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-009-0008-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-009-0008-1

Key words

Navigation