Abstract
Spider mites are important pests of cotton, a vital fiber crop cultivated in sun-drenched regions. This study investigated the prevalence and distribution of spider mite species infesting cotton fields in Aydin province, Türkiye. Spider mites were found in a significant portion (89%) of the surveyed fields. The two most abundant mite species, were the red form (RF) of Tetranychus urticae (57.1%) and T. turkestani (39.3%). A minor presence of T. urticae green form (GF) (3.6%) was observed. Tetranychus urticae RF was more prevalent in coastal areas, while T. turkestani was more common inland. Field surveys demonstrated that areas with higher T. urticae RF prevalence exhibited more frequent spraying, potentially due to this species’ greater capacity to develop resistance compared to T. turkestani. This study also investigated the prevalence of Wolbachia, Rickettsia, Cardinium and Spiroplasma endosymbionts, which are linked with pesticide resistance due to their ability to degrade pesticides, in these mite populations. The study confirmed the presence of Wolbachia and Rickettsia endosymbionts in spider mite populations in Türkiye. However, no Cardinium or Spiroplasma were detected in any of the populations. Infection rates of the detected endosymbionts differed between T. urticae and T. turkestani. Future studies should investigate the resistance levels of these tetranychid mite species as well as the role of their endosymbiotic bacteria in resistance in cotton-growing areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gossypium hirsutum L. (Cotton), a vital fiber crop cultivated in regions spanning latitudes 37° North and 32° South. It serves as a cornerstone of global commerce, generating substantial income for producing nations and bolstering local economies (Basal et al., 2019). Cotton cultivation also plays a significant role in the Turkish economy by contributing substantially to the nation’s export revenues. It is mainly concentrated in regions such as the Aegean, Southeastern Anatolia and Mediterranean (Cevheri & Şahin, 2020).
However, ecological challenges posed by global warming, as well as important pest species prevalent in production areas, are significant factors limiting cotton production. Spider mites are one of the most important group of cotton pests in the world (Guo et al., 2013; Jeppson et al., 1975; Sulek & Cakmak, 2022). These mites are polyphagous pests that can be found on various parts of the cotton plant, particularly on the undersides of young and vigorous leaves (Jeppson et al., 1975; Migeon & Dorkeld, 2024). They often form high density populations at the axil between the leaf petiole and leaf blade and can spread to other parts of the plant through the webbing they produce while feeding. Their feeding activity results in characteristic scattered yellow spots on the upper leaf surface. Over time, the yellow spots turn red due to damage to the chlorophyll, which gives the leaf its green color. This reddening intensifies, ultimately causing premature leaf desiccation and abscission. High densities of spider mites can also lead to the shedding of bolls, flowers, and small boll sizes (Jeppson et al., 1975; Simons, 1964; Sulek & Cakmak, 2022; Sulek et al., 2023).
Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval [synonym of T. urticae Koch (Auger et al., 2013)], T. atlanticus McGregor (currently known as T. turkestani (Ugarov & Nikolskii); Migeon & Dorkeld, 2024), and T. desertorum Banks have been identified as the dominant mite species in cotton fields in Türkiye (Düzgüneş, 1962; Dinçer, 1975). Over the years, these spider mites have posed a significant threat to cotton-growing areas within the Aydin province, typically between late April or early May until harvesting in September and October. Cotton growers have reported an increase in spider mite problems and have encountered challenges in effectively managing these pests (Sulek & Cakmak, 2022; Sulek et al., 2023). The difficulty in control may arise from the presence of different Tetranychus species or the development of resistance to acaricides by the spider mite population. Preliminary studies have found T. urticae in a few cotton leaf samples (Sulek & Cakmak, 2022). However, other spider mite species, such as T. atlanticus or T. desertorum, may also be present in cotton fields, making control more challenging (Düzgüneş, 1962; Dinçer, 1975). The last comprehensive study on Tetranychus species diversity in the region was conducted by Dinçer (1975). Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the spider mite species found in cotton fields of Aydin province, specifically in cotton growing areas of Soke, Germencik, Kocarli, and Nazilli through both morphological and molecular species identification. Such studies would provide important insights into the species composition and distribution of spider mites in Aydin province. Additionally, they would help reveal the presence of associated endosymbiotic bacteria and guide future research in this area.
Pesticide degradation by certain microorganisms within the arthropods’ microbiome is another mechanism of resistance development. The role of such arthropod microbiota in many physiological and metabolic functions has emerged as an important area of study (Zhu et al., 2019). Endosymbiotic bacteria, such as Wolbachia and Cardinium, are known to be present in arthropod hosts, including mites (Hoy & Jeyaprakash, 2005; Enigl & Schausberger, 2007; Pekas et al., 2017; Zélé et al., 2020). These endosymbiotic bacteria have been reported to promote parthenogenesis, induce feminization of populations, cause male mortality, and lead to cytoplasmic incompatibility. Wolbachia has also been found to protect against viral infections in its hosts. Although the effects of Wolbachia and Cardinium on their hosts are not yet fully understood (Ros et al., 2012), it has been suggested that some endosymbiotic bacteria can provide defense mechanisms against natural enemies and degrade pesticides (Güz et al., 2015). Understanding the mechanisms of microbiota-mediated resistance could lead to novel control strategies that manipulate or target the spider mite microbiome.
The main objective of this study is to determine the species diversity of Tetranychus mites in cotton-growing areas of Aydin province through morphological and molecular species identification. Additionally, it aims to determine the endosymbiotic bacteria associated with these mites. These efforts will provide important information about the species of spider mites and their distribution in Aydin province, as well as contribute to understanding the potential impacts of endosymbiotic bacteria on the development of resistance to acaricides in this region.
Material and methods
Sampling
Samples were collected from the districts of Germencik, Kocarli, Nazilli and Soke which are the largest cotton producers in the Aydin province in June, July, and August of 2020–2021. Leaves infested with spider mites (~ 20 leaves/field) were collected with the aid of hand lens (× 30) from cotton fields in each district separately. A total of 220 fields (2–50 hectares) were sampled (Fig. 1), and the colors of spider mite samples were also recorded. During sampling, cotton leaves were initially placed in paper bags and then transferred to polyethylene bags. Subsequently, the samples were stored in an ice box and transported to the Acarological Laboratory of Aydin Adnan Menderes University. The samples were kept in a refrigerator (4 °C) until examination. For molecular identification of Tetranychus species, 100 adult females from each field were individually placed into microcentrifuge tubes using a stereo microscope (Leica EZ4) and a vacuum pump (KNF N022 AN18). To prevent contamination between sampled areas, hands and arms were cleaned with 96% ethyl alcohol before collecting samples from any other field.
Morphological identification of Tetranychus species
Adult females and males were directly mounted ventrally and dorso-ventrally, respectively, in Hoyer’s medium under a stereomicroscope (Leica-EZ4). The slides were dried in an oven (Memmert UN110) at 45 °C for five days. Four to eight females and males were separately mounted from each field and a total of 2512 slides were prepared from the districts of Germencik (356♀, 335♂), Kocarli (276♀, 275♂), Nazilli (298♀, 302♂) and Soke (344♀, 326♂). Female and male slides were morphologically examined using a light microscope (Zeiss Imager A2 DIC). Photomicrographs were captured with an AxioCam 506 color (Carl Zeiss, Germany) digital camera. Pritchard & Baker (1955), Jeppson et al. (1975), Flechtmann & Knihinicki (2002), Seeman & Beard (2011) were used in the morphological identification of Tetranychus species.
Voucher specimens were deposited in the collection of I. Cakmak at the Department of Plant Protection, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Türkiye.
Molecular verification of Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani
DNA extraction was performed from the collected populations using the SDS sodium acetate method (Cenis, 1992). For this purpose, ten females from each field were randomly selected under the stereomicroscope. They were transferred to 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and crushed with pestle (Axygen®) for 1 min at 200 rpm in 300 µl lysis buffer (Raeder & Broda, 1985). DNA pellet was dissolved with 25 µl of T10E1 and stored at -20 °C to use molecular studies. The main species found through morphological studies, T. urticae and T. turkestani were subjected to molecular verification using a multiplex PCR method proposed by Sinaie et al. (2018) was used. In PCR studies, multiplex primers UrtF, TurkF and TetCR were used to amplify a 739 bp product for T. urticae and 950 bp for T. turkestani in the ITS region (Table 1). PCR mixture was adjusted to a total volume of 20 μl containing 2 μl of 10 × PCR Buffer (containing 20 mM MgCl2), 0.4 µl dNTP (10 mM each), 0.1 µl DreamTaq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 0.08 μl of each primer (UrtF, TurkF and TetCR, 100 µM each), 15.26 µl distilled water and 2 μl of DNA template. PCR was performed using the BioRad C1000 instrument. PCR steps included 30 s of denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s of annealing at 51 °C and 60 s of extension at 72 °C, with a total of 30 cycles. The initial denaturation was performed at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. After amplification, the products were separated in %1.5 agarose gel at 45 V for 45 min. The gel was then stained with GelRed (Biotium) for 30 min and observed under UV transilluminator (302 nm). Bands of about 739 bp were identified as T. urticae and 950 bp as T. turkestani.
In sequencing studies, test groups were formed based on the geographical locations where samples were collected, regardless of the sample year. The distances between these groups, including species T. urticae (red and green forms) and T. turkestani, were analyzed using QGIS ver. 3.28, with the Ward’s Lance-William function for the Hierarchical clustering algorithm (QGIS Development Team, 2022). Subsequently, 21 representative populations were selected from these groups. For sequencing of the selected populations, 2 primer pairs specific to both ITS2 (ITS2a, ITS2b) and mtCOI (COI-F, COI-R) gene regions were used for amplification of target regions (Table 1). PCR steps included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 30 s denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 55 or 50 °C, 60 s extension at 72 °C for 30 cycles. In addition, it consists of 5 min of final extension steps at 72 °C. The PCR products were sent to Macrogen for sequencing and sequences were determined by Sanger in one-direction using forward primers. The obtained sequences were cropped/checked with 4Peaks (Mac ver. 1.8) software and compared with the sequences of the previously uploaded species in the NCBI gene bank (National Library of Medicine) using a nucleotide blast query. Matching results were identified at the species level by considering the similarity rates and frequency of occurrence (Morgulis et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2000).
Endosymbiotic bacteria associated with Tetranychus species
The presence of some symbiotic microorganisms such as Wolbachia, Cardinium, Rickettsia, and Spiroplasma species living in mites was investigated using PCR with the primer pairs specified in Table 1. DNA quality and potential PCR defects were accounted for using spider mite generic primers. These studies relied on genomic DNA extracts as the basis for identifying mites.
Populations were grouped according to T. urticae (red and green forms) and T. turkestani, based on their geographical locations and distances using QGIS ver. 3.28 (QGIS Development Team, 2022). A total of 21 samples from studied mite sequencing were also included. Using these groups, endosymbiont identification studies were carried out on 70 separate populations. Amplification was performed by qPCR (BioRad CFX96) with a total of 10 µl mix (SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix, BioRad). qPCR steps consisted of the following: a 3-min initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing/extension at 52–65 °C (see Table 1) for 30 s. A final step with a temperature sequence for melting curve analysis was included. Data readings were performed at the end of each extension step from the FAM channel. The study also incorporated control; in Tetranychus evansi (teva, 6M1), Tetranychus ludeni (tlu), Tetranychus urticae (green form, turtg, Santport2), Tetranychus urticae (red form, turtr, SB9) were obtained from Dr. Flore Zélé (University of Montpellier, France) and Eutetranychus orientalis (eu) were used as positive and negative controls. Cq values were evaluated using BioRad Maestro (ver. 5.2.008.022) program.
Results
Morphological identification of Tetranychus species and their prevalence
Spider mites were found in 196 out of 220 cotton fields that were visited in Germencik, Kocarli, Nazilli and Soke districts of Aydin province in 2020 and 2021. Based on the slides of female and male samples, two spider mite species, Tetranychus urticae (red form [RF] and green form [GF]) and T. turkestani, were identified (Fig. 2).
Tetranychus urticae is close to T. turkestani by male: dorsal margin of knob of aedeagus angulate flat or evenly rounded; empodia I–II each with an obvious dorsal spur, empodium I clawlike (uncinate), empodia II–IV with proximoventral hairs long and free; peritreme hook. Female: tarsus I with sockets of 4 tactile setae proximal to the socket of the proximal duplex setae; dorsal striae longitudinal between setae e1–e1 and f1–f1 forming a diamond-shaped pattern between setae e1 and f1; dorsal striae with lobes, but it can be distinguished by its different aedeagus (knob of aedeagus small, less than twice as long [about 1.5 ×] as the width of the neck; dorsal margin of knob tends to be angulate in T. urticae vs. knob of aedeagus with large posterior projection, its length approximately equal to the width of the neck; dorsal margin of the knob angulate in T. turkestani) (for more information, see Zhang, 2003).
Tetranychus urticae was detected at a rate of 60.7% (57.1% red form and 3.6% green form) in 119 out of 196 cotton fields. In 77 fields, T. turkestani was found at a rate of 39.3%. T. urticae RF was extensively found in Germencik (89.2%) and Soke (87.8%), whereas T. turkestani was found in Kocarli (65.9%) and Nazilli (90.2%) in 2020–2021. T. urticae RF was detected only in Germencik and Soke, while T. urticae GF was solely found in Nazilli. However, both T. urticae RF and GF were found in Kocarli (Table 2).
Molecular verification of Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani
Multiplex PCR studies conducted with UrtF, TurkF, and TetCR primers revealed that out of the 196 populations examined, 119 were identified as T. urticae (112 red, 7 green form), and 77 were determined to be T. turkestani. Gel electrophoresis photographs of 6 representative populations selected from all samples are given in Fig. 3. Molecular test results were found to be compatible with morphological identification results.
In sequence analyses, ITS2 gene region enabled classification of 6 out of the 21 collected populations as T. urticae (identity > 99.36%) and 11 populations as T. turkestani (identity > 99.5%). The remaining four populations were discarded because of poor sequence quality for this gene region. In COI sequences, between 384 and 407 bp sequence were obtained and matched 9 out of 21 individuals as T. urticae (identity > 99.49%) and 10 populations as T. turkestani (identity > 99.75%). The sequences of remaining two populations were discarded because of poor sequence quality. While both ITS2 and COI gene sequence were obtained from fifteen samples, sequences of ITS or COI were obtained from six samples. Thus, 21 of the sequenced populations were identified at the species level in parallel with the results of the multiplex PCR test and morphological identification.
Endosymbiotic bacteria associated with Tetranychus species
The qPCR analysis was performed with spider mite primers (ITS1G-F and ITS1G-R) in all 70 spider mite populations used for endosymbiont detection. The results confirmed that negative reactions can be distinguished from PCR defects by obtaining a Cq value between 17.13 and 35.52 (Threshold: 207.59; major single peak at 79 °C in Melting curve analysis). The qPCR analysis showed that twenty-nine populations were infected with only Wolbachia (with wsp81F and wsp691R primers, Cq values: 26.48–35.64, major single peak at 80 °C in melting curve). Tetranychus turkestani populations showed higher infection rates (21) compared to T. urticae (8). Fourteen populations were infected with Rickettsia (with RICS741F and RCIT1197R primers, Cq values: 23.73–35.35, major single peak at 87 °C in melting curve). Higher rates were found in T. urticae (10) compared to T. turkestani (4). One population each of T. urticae and T. turkestani was infected with both Wolbachia and Rickettsia (Table 3). No Cardinium or Spiroplasma was detected in the populations (while positive controls previously known to contain this symbiont for Cardinium gave positive results as expected, a positive control for Spiroplasma could not be obtained, so the populations were evaluated as probable negative). In each endosymbiont study; although an appropriate Cq value was obtained, samples showing a different melting temperature than the positive controls were considered as non-specific reaction and were considered negative for a specific endosymbiont.
Discussion
Field sampling conducted in Aydin province over a two- year period, revealed that 89% of cotton fields (196 out of 220) were infested with spider mites. Additionally, our results showed Tetranychus urticae RF (57.1%) and T. turkestani (39.3%) as the most prevalent species, with a lesser incidence of T. urticae GF (3.6%). This aligns with previous research in Türkiye which found that T. urticae, T. cinnabarinus, T. turkestani and T. desertorum were common spider mite species in cotton fields (Düzgüneş, 1962; Dinçer, 1975). We agree that T. cinnabarinus is a junior synonym of T. urticae (Auger et al., 2013). Tetranychus desertorum, which was detected once in 1962, was not found in this study or in recent literature. This suggests that it may be rare or that there may have been a misidentification (Migeon & Dorkeld, 2024).
Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani are globally distributed mite species that cause damage and yield loss to a variety of vegetable, field and ornamental crops. This study demonstrated the exclusive presence of T. urticae and T. turkestani in cotton fields, which is consistent with findings by Ben-David et al. (2007) in agricultural habitats in Israel. However, the coexistence of these species was later reported in these fields (Ben-David et al., 2009). It is possible that they may co-occur in Aydin cotton fields in future. Similar multi-species infestations have been documented in other parts of the world. Tetranychus turkestani, T. urticae and T. pacificus McGregor were identified as the primary tetranychid mite species responsible for cotton damage in the San Joaquin Valley in California (Carey & Bradley, 1982). All three species were present in all areas where cotton was cultivated. Guo et al. (2013) reported the coexistence of T. turkestani and T. truncatus in cotton fields in Xinjiang, with T. turkestani potentially displacing the dominant T. truncatus in some areas.
This study is the first report on the occurrence and the prevalence of T. urticae RF & GF and T. turkestani in the cotton fields of Türkiye. Notably, T. urticae RF & GF was detected at a significantly higher rate (60.7%) compared to T. turkestani (39.3%). The analysis of species incidence in terms of locations and years showed that T. urticae RF dominance in Germencik and Soke (25 km and 15 km from the coast, respectively), whereas T. turkestani was more common in Nazilli (110 km far from the sea). Despite being prevalent in Kocarli (60 km from the sea), both T. urticae RF and GF were also detected alongside T. turkestani. These findings are in alignment with ecological requirements of the species. T. urticae GF thrives in cold temperate latitudes with hot and dry summers, while T. urticae RF prefers warmer temperate and subtropical regions, or greenhouses in northern geographical regions (Auger et al., 2013). During the cotton growing season, the average temperature in areas dominated by T. turkestani (Nazilli) was similar to areas where T. urticae RF (Soke) was detected, ranging between 25–35˚C. However, Soke had higher relative humidity (50–75%) compared to Nazilli (45–55%) (Meteoblue, 2024a, 2024b). High temperatures and low rainfall are more favorable for T. turkestani development (Jeppson et al., 1975), supporting the results of this study. Conversely, Carey and Bradley (1982) reported that T. urticae was found mainly in the eastern and southern regions of the San Jaquen Valley, while no distinct regional pattern was observed for T. turkestani in cotton. These areas typically have the Mediterranean climate, with rainy winters and dry summers. Simons (1964) noted distinct colonization patterns. Tetranychus turkestani forms dense aggregations, while T. urticae is more dispersed. This aligns with the greater damage potential of T. turkestani observed by Jeppson et al. (1975). The present study suggests this species shift might explain the recent increase in Tetranychus-related damage within the region.
In our study, we found Wolbachia in 9 out of 36 T. urticae populations and 22 of the 34 T. turkestani populations, whereas Rickettsia was found in 11 out of 36 T. urticae populations and 5 out of the 34 T. turkestani populations. Cardinium and Spiroplasma were not found in any of the sampled mites. These endosymbiont genera are common in arthropods (Jeyaprakash & Hoy, 2000). Since these endosymbionts may facilitate pesticide resistance, further research is required to investigate the specific relationships between the observed endosymbionts and Tetranychus species in sampled cotton fields. This may clarify the development of resistance, either at the species level or through endosymbiont interactions.
Ongoing research conducted in the province of Aydin has demonstrated a correlation between the intensity of acaricide usage and the dominant Tetranychus mite species. Areas with a high prevalence of T. urticae RF populations had more frequent spraying compared to regions with T. turkestani predominance (unpublished data). This observation is supported by studies that indicate T. urticae GF develops resistance to acaricides at a higher rate compared to other species (Lu et al., 2016), which may explain the increased use of spraying. However, studies have also shown a significant variability in acaricide resistance even within T. urticae RF populations (Yalçın et al., 2018). Specific populations can have different levels of resistance depending on the chemical compound, which could potentially complicate pest management strategies. The observed discrepancy in acaricide usage within Aydin province may be attributed to the susceptibility of T. turkestani to common acaricides, in contrast to the varying levels of resistance found in T. urticae. Historical studies further corroborate this notion (Grafton-Cardwell et al., 1987; Bruce-Oliver & Grafton-Cardwell, 1996; Shen et al., 2017; Sohrabi & Ziaee, 2021).
In conclusion, our findings indicate the prevalence of tetranychid mites in Aydin cotton cultivation with T. urticae RF and T. turkestani as the most prevalent species. Areas with T. urticae RF were reported to have a higher acaricide usage. This could be related to acaricide resistance development within this population. Conducting additional research to investigate the distribution and the resistance levels of these tetranychid mite species, and the potential overlap of niches in cotton-growing areas is of utmost importance. This vital information will contribute to the development of sustainable spider mite management practices by enabling us to predict and anticipate shifts in species composition in the future.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Auger, P., Migeon, A., Ueckermann, E. A., Tiedt, L., & Navajas, M. (2013). Evidence for synonymy between Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae): Review and new data. Acarologia, 53(4), 383–415. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20132102
Basal, H., Karademir, E., Goren, H. K., et al. (2019). Cotton production. In K. Jabran & B. S. Chauhan (Eds.), Cotton production in Turkey and Europe (pp. 297–321). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Ben-David, T., Gerson, U., & Morin, S. (2009). Asymmetric reproductive interference between two closely related spider mites: Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 48, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9228-9
Ben-David, T., Melamed, S., Gerson, U., & Morin, S. (2007). ITS2 sequences as barcodes for identifying and analyzing spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 41, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-007-9058-1
Braig, H. R., Zhou, W. G., Dobson, S. L., & O’Neill, S. L. (1998). Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Journal of Bacteriology, 180(9), 2373–2378. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.180.9.2373-2378.1998
Bruce-Oliver, S. J., & Grafton-Cardwell, B. (1996). Evaluation of two seasons of acaricide rotation trials of spider mite (Acari: Tetrancychidae) resistance in San Joaquin Valley cotton. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (vol 2, pp. 1128–1131). National Cotton Council.
Carey, J. R., & Bradley, J. W. (1982). Developmental rates, vital schedules, sex ratios and life tables for Tetrancyhus urticae, T. turkestani and T. pacificus (Acarina: Tetranychidae) on cotton. Acarologia, 23, 333–345.
Cenis, J. (1992). Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Research, 20(9), 2380–2380. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.9.2380
Cevheri, C. I., & Şahin, M. (2020). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de pamuk üretiminin tekstil sektörü açısından önemi. Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 5(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.46578/humder.736777
Davis, M. J., Ying, Z. T., Brunner, B. R., Pantoja, A., & Ferwerda, F. H. (1998). Rickettsial relative associated with papaya bunchy top disease. Current Microbiology, 36(2), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002849900283
Dinçer, J. (1975). Ege Bölgesinde pamuklara arız olan Tetranychidae familyası türleri, tanınmaları ve kimyasal savaş eşiği tayini üzerinde araştırmalar. T.C. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı Zirai Mücadele ve Zirai Karantina Genel Müdürlüğü, Araştırma Eserleri Serisi, Teknik Bülten No: 25, İstiklal Matbaası, İzmir.
Düzgüneş, Z. (1962). Pamuk akarları (kırmızı örümcekler). Türkiye Ziraatına Zararlı Olan Böcekler Ve Mücadelesi, 6(3), 70–77.
Enigl, M., & Schausberger, P. (2007). Incidence of the endosymbionts Wolbachia, Cardinium and Spiroplasma in phytoseiid mites and associated prey. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 42, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-007-9080-3
Flechtmann, C. H. W., & Knihinicki, D. K. (2002). New species and new record of Tetranychus Dufour from Australia, with a key to the major groups in this genus based on females (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae). Australian Journal of Entomology, 41(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6055.2002.00289.x
Fukatsu, T., Tsuchida, T., Nikoh, N., & Koga, R. (2001). Spiroplasma symbiont of the Pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Insecta: Homoptera). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(3), 1284–1291. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.3.1284-1291.2001
Grafton-Cardwell, E. E., Granett, J., & Leigh, T. F. (1987). Spider mite species (Acari: Tetranychidae) response to propargite: Basis for an acaricide resistance management program. Journal of Economic Entomology, 80, 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/80.3.579
Guo, Y. L., Jiao, X. C., Xu, J. J., Yang, S., Duan, X. K., & Zhang, J. P. (2013). Growth and reproduction of Tetranychus turkestani and Tetranychus trun c atus (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cotton and corn. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 18(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.1.10
Güz, N., Dağeri, A., & Aksoy, S. (2015). Endosimbiyotik bakterilerin böcekler üzerine etkisi. Türkiye Entomoloji Bülteni, 5(2), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.16969/teb.41890
Hoy, A. M., & Jeyaprakash, A. (2005). Microbial diversity in the predatory mite Mestaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its prey, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biological Control, 32, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.12.012
Hurtado, M. A., Ansaloni, T., Cros-Arteil, S., Jacas, J. A., & Navajas, M. (2008). Sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers region in spider mites (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) occurring in citrus orchards in Eastern Spain: Use for species discrimination. Annals of Applied Biology, 153(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00250.x
Jeppson, L. T., Keifer, H. H., & Baker, E. W. (1975). Mites injurious to economic plants. University of California Press.
Jeyaprakash, A., & Hoy, M. A. (2000). Long PCR im-proves Wolbachia DNA amplification: Wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Molecular Biology, 9, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00203.x
Lu, W., Wang, M., Xu, Z., Shen, G., Wei, P., Li, M., Reid, W., & He, L. (2016). Adaptation of acaricide stress facilitates Tetranychus urticae expanding against Tetranychus cinnabarinus in China. Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1233–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2724
Meteoblue, (2024a). Meteorological archive in Soke. https://www.meteoblue.com/tr/hava/historyclimate/weatherarchive/s%c3%b6ke_t%c3%bcrkiye_300399. Accessed 16 Mar 2024.
Meteoblue, (2024b). Meteorological archive in Nazilli. https://www.meteoblue.com/tr/hava/historyclimate/weatherarchive/nazilli_t%c3%bcrkiye_303873. Accessed 16 Mar 2024.
Migeon, A., & Dorkeld, F. (2024). Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. Available from https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/spmweb (Accessed 28/02/2024)
Morgulis, A., Coulouris, G., Raytselis, Y., Madden, T. L., Agarwala, R., & Schäffer, A. A. (2008). Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics, 24, 1757–1764. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322
Navajas, M., Gutierrez, J., Lagnel, J., & Boursot, P. (1996). Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I in tetranychid mites: A comparison between molecular phylogeny and changes of morphological and life history traits. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 86(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300034994
Pekas, A., Palevsky, E., Sumner, J. C., Perotti, M. A., Nesvorna, M., & Hubert, J. (2017). Comparison of bacterial microbiota of the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its factitious prey Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae). Scientific Reports, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00046-6
Pritchard, A. E., & Baker, E. W. (1955). A revision of the spider mite family Tetranychidae. Memoirs of the Pacific Coast Entomological Society, San Francisco, p. 472. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.150852
QGIS Development Team, (2022). QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. https://www.qgis.org
Raeder, U., & Broda, P. (1985). Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1985.tb01479.x
Ros, V. I. D., Fleming, V. M., Feil, E. J., & Breeuwer, J. A. J. (2012). Diversity and recombination in Wolbachia and Cardinium from Bryobia spider mites. BMC Microbiology, 12(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-S1-S13
Seeman, O. D., & Beard, J. J. (2011). Identification of exotic pest and Australian native and naturalised species of Tetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Zootaxa, 2961(1), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2961.1.1
Shen, X. Q., Zhang, Y. N., Li, T., Jiang, J. Y. Q., & Zhang, J. P. (2017). Toxicity of three acaricides to the predatory mite, Neoseiulus bicaudus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and their impact on the functional response to Tetranychus turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 110(5), 2031–2038. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox206
Simons, J. N. (1964). Tetranychid mites as defoliators of cotton cotyledons. Journal of Economic Entomology, 57(1), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/57.1.145
Sinaie, S., Sadeghi, N., & H., & Fekrat, L. (2018). A multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous discrimination of two predominant spider mites of the genus Tetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae) in greenhouses of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20(4), 733–744.
Sohrabi, F., & Ziaee, M. (2021). Lethal and sublethal eff ects of several plant compounds compared to spiromesifen against Tetranychus turkestani . Hellenic Plant Protection Journal, 14, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/hppj-2021-0009
Sulek, N., & Cakmak, I. (2022). Performance of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on six cotton varieties with varying degree of leaf pubescence. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 27(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.27.3.4
Sulek, N., Doker, I., Saboori, A., & Cakmak, I. (2023). Prey consumption capacity and functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on different cotton varieties. Acarologia, 63(3), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.24349/o7gh-1c6y
Yalçın, K., Döker, I., & Kazak, C. (2018). Acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae red form (Acari: Tetranychidae) collected from strawberry in southern Turkey: Bioassay and biochemical studies. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 23(12), 2279–2287. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.12.1
Zchori-Fein, E., & Perlman, S. J. (2004). Distribution of the bacterial symbiont Cardinium in arthropods. Molecular Ecology, 13(7), 2009–2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02203.x
Zélé, F., Altintas, M., Santos, I., Cakmak, I., & Magalhaes, S. (2020). Population-specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites. Ecology and Evoluation, 10(9), 3868–3880. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6015
Zélé, F., Weill, M., & Magalhães, S. (2018). Identification of spider-mite species and their endosymbionts using multiplex PCR. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 74(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0224-4
Zhang, Z. Q. (2003). Mites of greenhouses, ıdentification, biology and control. CABI Publishing.
Zhang, Z., Schwartz, S., Wagner, L., & Miller, W. (2000). A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology, 7(1–2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270050081478
Zhu, Y., Song, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, D., & Hong, X. (2019). The microbiota in spider mite feces potentially reflects intestinal bacterial communities in the host. Insect Science, 27(5), 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12716
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Aydin Adnan Menderes University Research Foundation (ZRF-20031). The authors thank Dr. Flore Zélé for sending Tetranychus evansi (teva, 6M1), Tetranychus ludeni (tlu), Tetranychus urticae (green form, turtg, Santport2) and Tetranychus urticae (red form, turtr, SB9), Dr. Mohammad Khanjani for confirmation of spider mite species, Dr. Mustapha Touray for editing the manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK). Aydin Adnan Menderes University Research Foundation (ZRF-20031).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IC, ÜÖ, CK, RA, and BÇ conceived and designed the experiment; FÇY and IC acquired the data; SMM and AS identified spider mite species; ÜÖ performed molecular analyses; IC, ÜÖ, SMM, CK, RA, BÇ, and AS wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yüksel, F.Ç., Özyılmaz, Ü., Mahdavi, S.M. et al. Prevalence of Tetranychus urticae Koch and T. turkestani (Ugarov & Nikolskii) (Acari: Tetranychidae) and their endosymbiotic bacteria in cotton fields of Aydin, Türkiye. Phytoparasitica 52, 60 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01179-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01179-x