Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the effect of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) infection on some yield components of tomato

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) on yield and quality of tomato fruits were studied from May through November of 2004 at the Experimental Field of the Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayis University, in Samsun province, Turkey. TSWV caused 42.1% and 95.5% reduction in yield and marketable value of tomato, respectively. TSWV infection in tomato crop caused significant (P < 0.05) reductions in weight, total number, width and length of the fruits in infected plants. Reductions in yield-contributing parameters were 26.61% in weight, 20.18% in number, 10.94% in width and 11.93% in length of fruits. It is difficult to estimate the actual yield loss and influence levels of TSWV in the field. Economic data are scarce, but in the present study it was estimated that the yield loss due to TSWV in tomatoes was approximately $0.9 million in Samsun, Turkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, S. (2000). Tomato spotted wilt virus—positive steps towards negative success. Molecular Plant Pathology, 1, 151–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shahwan, I. M., Abdalla, O. A., & Al-Saleh, M. A. (1995). Response of greenhouse-grown cucumber cultivars to an isolate of zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV). Plant Disease, 79, 898–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1991). Tomato spotted wilt virus. Report on Plant Disease No. 665, pp. 1–8. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.

  • Anon. (2004). Turkish Statistical Institute Database, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=45&ust_id=13.

  • Anon. (2009). FAO Statistical Databases (http://faostat.fao.org/site/339).

  • Arli-Sokmen, M., Mennan, H., Sevik, M. A., & Ecevit, O. (2005). Occurrence of viruses in field-grown pepper crops and some of their reservoir weed hosts in Samsun, Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 33, 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittlebank, C. C. (1919). Tomato diseases. Journal of Agriculture, Victoria, 27, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. J., Mau, R. F. L., Gonsalves, D., & Mitchell, W. C. (1986). Reservoir weed hosts of Tomato spotted wilt virus. Plant Disease, 70, 1014–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y., Yang, H. Y., & Ozias-Akins, P. (2004). Characterization of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) transformed with the N-gene of Tomato spotted wilt virus. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-649151251.html.

  • Clark, M. R., & Adams, A. M. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34, 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Pérez, J. C., Batal, K. D., Granberry, D., Bertrand, D., Giddings, D., & Pappu, H. (2003). Vegetative top growth and yield of tomato grown on plastic film mulches as affected by the appearance of symptoms of Tomato spotted wilt virus. Hortscience, 38, 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engindeniz, S. (2007). Economic analysis of processing tomato growing: the case study of Torbali, west Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, A. A., Akanda, A. M., & Islam, D. (2007). Impact of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) on growth contributing characters of eight tomato varieties under field conditions. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 2, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francki, R. I. B., & Hatta, T. (1981). Tomato spotted wilt virus. Comparative diagnosis (pp. 491–512). In E. Kurstak (Ed.) Handbook of plant virus infections. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.

  • German, T. L., Ullman, D. E., & Moyer, J. W. (1992). Tospoviruses: diagnosis, molecular biology, phylogeny and vector relationships. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 30, 315–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gitaitis, R. D., Dowler, C. C., & Chalfant, R. B. (1998). Epidemiology of Tomato spotted wilt virus in pepper and tomato in Southern Georgia. Plant Disease, 82, 752–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, O., De Borbon, C. M., Granval De Millan, N., & Cuesta, G. V. (1999). Occurrence of different tospoviruses in vegetable crops in Argentina. Journal of Phytopathology, 147, 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gragera, J., Soler, S., Diez, M. J., Catala, M. S., Rodriguez, M. C., Esparrago, G., et al. (2003). Evaluation of some processing tomato lines with resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus for agricultural and processing characters. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 1, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. R. (2005). Plant viruses transmitted by thrips. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 113, 119–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-H., Choi, G.-S., Kim, J.-S., & Choi, J.-K. (2004). Characterization of Tomato spotted wilt virus from paprika in Korea. Plant Pathology Journal, 20, 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriones, E., Aramburu, J., Riudavets, J., Arno, J., & Laviña, A. (1998). Effect of plant age at time of infection by tomato spotted wilt tospovirus on the yield of field-grown tomato. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrella, G., Gognalons, P., Gebre-Selassie, K., Vovlas, C., & Marchoux, G. (2003). An update of the host range of Tomato spotted wılt vırus. Journal of Plant Pathology, 85, 227–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataky, N. R. (1991). Tomato spotted wilt virus. Report on Plant Disease RPD No. 665, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

  • Pearce, M. J. (2005). 2004 Georgia plant disease loss estimates. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Published online by the Univ. of Georgia College of Agriculture and Environmental Science/U.S. Department of Agriculture as Special Bulletin 41–07.

  • Polston, J. E., & Anderson, P. K. (1997). The emergence of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses in tomato in the western hemisphere. Plant Disease, 81, 1358–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, I. J., Donald, E. C., Minchinton, E. J., & Wilson, L. (2007). Pathogens of importance and their economic impact on the Australian vegetable industry (pp. 1–2). Victoria, Australia: Biosciences Research Division, Department of Prımary Industrıes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramkat, R., Wangai, A. W., Ouma, J. P., Rapando, P. N., & Lelgut, D. K. (2006). Effect of mechanical inoculation of Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus disease on disease severity and yield of greenhouse raised tomatoes. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 5, 607–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2004). Thrips and Tomato spotted wilt management in tomato—a cost effective IPM program. Georgia IPM. On-line http://www.gaipm.org/vegetable/thripstswv.html.

  • Riley, D. G. (2000). Vegetable report. In: Summary of losses from insect damage and costs of control in Georgia. Georgia Cooperative Extension Service http://entomology.ent.uga.edu/IPM/sl00/vegetable.htm.

  • Roosjen, M., Buurma, J., & Barwegen, J. (1998). Verbetering schade-inschattingsmodel quarantaine-organismen glastuinbouw. Verslagen en Mededelingen, Wageningen, 197, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosello, S., Diez, M. J., & Nuez, F. (1996). Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. I. The Tomato spotted wilt virus—a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 67, 117–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi, M., & Warade, S. D. (2008). Tomato breeding for resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV): an overview of conventional and molecular approaches. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 44, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, E.-S. A., & Sill, J. R. W. H. (1968). Resistance to Kansas Squash mosaic virus strains among Cucurbita species. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 71, 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Regenmortel, M. H. V., Fauquet, C. M., Bishop, D. H. L., Carstens, E. B., Estes, M. K., Lemon, S. M., et al. (2000). Virus taxonomy, classification and nomenclature of viruses. Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, V. R., & Jackson, H. R. (1975). Model for yield loss determination of bacterial blight of field beans utilizing aerial infrared photography combined with field plot studies. Phytopathology, 65, 942–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangai, A. W., Mandal, B., Pappu, H., & Kilonzo, S. (2001). Outbreak of Tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato in Kenya. Plant Disease, 85, 1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijkamp, I., & Peters, D. (1993). Determination of the median latent period of two tospoviruses in Frankliniella occidentalis using a novel leaf disk assay. Phytopathology, 82, 986–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the TUBITAK (Council of Science and Technology of Turkey, Project no. TOGTAG 3126) and Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund (Project no. Z-438) for this research. The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Orhan Gunduz (Dept. of Agricultural Economy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey) for calculating the economic loss.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Ali Sevik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sevik, M.A., Arli-Sokmen, M. Estimation of the effect of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) infection on some yield components of tomato. Phytoparasitica 40, 87–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0192-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0192-2

Keywords

Navigation