Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of resistance in cotton to whitefly (Bemisia tabaci): antixenosis

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Screenhouse experiments were conducted under free-choice conditions to determine the mechanism of resistance operating in cotton against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Twelve cotton genotypes belonging to Gossypium hirsutum and G. arboreum were assessed for oviposition preference by whitefly. The trichome density and length, distance from lower leaf surface to nearest vascular bundles, leaf lamina thickness and compactness of vascular bundles were estimated for each genotype and correlations with number of eggs laid were determined. The genotypes RS2098, CNH911, and PA183 were non-preferred for oviposition and exhibited an antixenosis mechanism of resistance. NHH44, LK861, Supriya, RS2013 and LD694 were categorized as moderately resistant while IS-376/4/1/20/72 and F846 were categorized as susceptible. Greater leaf lamina thickness and more compact vascular bundles were correlated with egg laying by whitefly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashraf, M., Zafar, Z. U., McNeilly, T., & Veltkamp, C. J. (1999). Some morpho-anatomical characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in relation to resistance to cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV). Angewandte Botanik, 73(3–4), 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blua, M. J., Yoshida, H. A., & Toscano, N. C. (1995). Oviposition preference of two Bemisia species (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology, 24, 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boica, A. L., Jr., Campos, Z. R., Lourencao, A. L., & Campos, A. R. (2007). Adult attractiveness and oviposition preference of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) B-biotypes in cotton genotypes. Scientia Agricola, 64, 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butter, N. S., & Vir, B. K. (1989). Morphological basis of resistance in cotton to the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Phytoparasitica, 17, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C. C., Cohen, A. C., Natwick, E. T., Simmons, G. S., & Henneberry, T. J. (1999). Silverleaf whitefly colonization and leaf shape and vascular bundles relationships in cotton. In P. Dugger & D. Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference, Vol 2 (pp. 909-910). Orlando, Florida, USA.

  • Chu, C. C., Freeman, T. P., Buckner, J. S., Henneberry, T. J., Nelson, D. R., & Natwick, E. T. (2001). Susceptibility of upland cotton cultivars to Bemisia tabaci biotype B (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in relation to leaf age and trichome density. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 94, 743–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C. C., Henneberry, T. J., & Cohen, A. C. (1995). Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): host preference and factors affecting oviposition and feeding site preference. Environmental Entomology, 24, 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C. C., Natwick, E. T., & Henneberry, T. J. (2002). Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes B colonization on okra and normal leaf upland cotton strains and cultivars. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95, 733–738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan, A. K. (2004). Insect resistance in cotton: Achievements and challenges. In G. S. Dhaliwal & R. Singh (Eds.), Host plant resistance to insects; concepts and applications (pp. 263–314). New Delhi, India: Panima Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, S., & Collier, R. H. (2000). Host-plant selection by insects—a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insect of cruciferous plants. Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata, 96, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal, V., & Dhaliwal, G. S. (2009). Elucidating resistance of cotton genotypes to whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, by population buildup studies. Phytoparasitica, 37, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal, V., Dhaliwal, G. S., & Dhawan, A. K. (2007). Mechanisms of resistance in cotton to whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): antibiosis. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 27, 216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal, V., Dhaliwal, G. S., Dhawan, A. K., & Dilawari, V. K. (2009). Mechanisms of resistance in cotton to whitefly (Bemisia tabaci): Tolerance. Phytoparasitica, 37, 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A. (1940). Plant microtechniques. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, R. L., Jr., Smith, C. W., & Smith, W. J. (1997). Preference of Gossypium genotypes to Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 90, 1046–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mound, L. A. (1965). Effect of leaf hairs on cotton whitefly population in the Sudan Gezira. Empire Cotton Growing Review, 42, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, R. H. (1951). Insect resistance in crop plants. New York, NY: The MacMillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, E. F. (1959). Botanical microtechniques (3rd ed.). London, UK: Constable and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, L. C., dos Santos, T. M., & Boica, A. L., Jr. (2003). Preference of Bemisia tabaci biotype B oviposition in cotton cultivars. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 38, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lenteren, J. C., & Noldus, L. P. J. J. (1990). Whitefly–plant relationships: Behavioural and ecological aspects. In D. Gerling (Ed.), Whiteflies: Their bionomics, pest status and management (pp. 47–89). Wimborne, UK: Intercept Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Jindal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jindal, V., Dhaliwal, G.S. Mechanisms of resistance in cotton to whitefly (Bemisia tabaci): antixenosis. Phytoparasitica 39, 129–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0144-x

Keywords

Navigation