Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concepts for Modeling Smart Cities

An ArchiMate Extension

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid increase and adoption of new Information Technologies (IT) in Smart Cities make the provision of public services more efficient. However, various municipalities and cities deal with challenges to transform and digitize city services. Smart Cities have a high degree of complexity where offered city services must respond to the concerns and goals of multiple stakeholders. These city services must also involve diverse data sources, multi-domain applications, and heterogeneous systems and technologies. Enterprise Architecture (EA) is an instrument to deal with complexity in both private and public organizations. The paper defines the concepts for modeling Smart Cities in ArchiMate, guided by a design-oriented research approach. Particularly, the focus of this paper is on the concepts for modeling city services and underlying information systems which are added to the EA metamodel. The metamodel is demonstrated in a real-world case and validated by Smart City domain experts. The findings suggest that these concepts are essential to achieve the Smart City strategy (e.g., city goals and objectives), as well as to meet the needs of different city stakeholders. Furthermore, an extension mechanism allows addressing the alignment of business and IT in complex environments such as Smart Cities, by adjusting EA metamodels and notations. This can help cities to design, visualize, and communicate architecture decisions when managing the transformation and digitalization of public services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ArchiSmartCity - https://github.com/vivikaing/ArchiSmartCity.

References

  • Ahlemann F, Stettiner E, Messerschmidt M, Legner C (2012) Strategic enterprise architecture management: challenges, best practices, and future developments. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers D, Wienhofen LW, Petersen SA, Anvaari M (2019) A smart city ecosystem enabling open innovation. In: International conference on innovations for community services. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 109–122

  • Al-Nasrawi S, Adams C, El-Zaart A (2015) A conceptual multidimensional model for assessing smart sustainable cities. JISTEM J Inf Syst Technol Manag 12(3):541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos T, Zaslavsky A, Kolomvatsos K, Medvedev A, Amirian P, Morley J, Hadjieftymiades S (2017) Challenges and opportunities of waste management in iot-enabled smart cities: a survey. IEEE Trans Sustain Comput 2(3):275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Jnr B (2021) Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture: a review and research agenda. Enterp Inf Syst 15(3):299–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthopoulos L, Fitsilis P (2014) Exploring architectural and organizational features in smart cities. In: International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT), 2014 16th, IEEE, pp 190–195

  • Baskerville R, Pries-Heje J (2010) Explanatory design theory. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(5):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastidas V, Bezbradica M, Helfert M (2017) Cities as enterprises: a comparison of smart city frameworks based on enterprise architecture requirements. International conference on smart cities. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 20–28

  • Bastidas V, Helfert M, Bezbradica M (2018) A requirements framework for the design of smart city reference architectures. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 2516–2523

  • Bifulco F, Tregua M, Amitrano CC, D’Auria A (2016) Ict and sustainability in smart cities management. Int J Publ Sect Manag 29(2):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Karagiannis D, Pittl B (2020) A survey of modeling language specification techniques. Inf Syst 87(101):425

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouguettaya A, Singh M, Huhns M, Sheng QZ, Dong H, Yu Q, Neiat AG, Mistry S, Benatallah B, Medjahed B et al (2017) A service computing manifesto: the next 10 years. Commun ACM 60(4):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckl S, Dierl T, Matthes F, Schweda CM (2010) Building blocks for enterprise architecture management solutions. In: Working conference on practice-driven research on enterprise transformation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–46

  • Cabrera C, Clarke S (2019) A self-adaptive service discovery model for smart cities. IEEE Trans Serv Comput

  • Carli R, Dotoli M, Pellegrino R (2016) A hierarchical decision-making strategy for the energy management of smart cities. IEEE Transact Autom Sci Eng 14(2):505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra L, Seidel S, Gregor S (2015) Prescriptive knowledge in is research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In: 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, pp 4039–4048

  • Cox A, Parslow P, De Lathouwer B, Klien E, Kempen B, Lonien J (2016) Espresso project d4.2 - definition of smart city reference architecture, systemic standardisation approach to empower smart cities and communities. http://espresso-project.eu/, Accessed 18 Sept 2019

  • Esmaeilian B, Wang B, Lewis K, Duarte F, Ratti C, Behdad S (2018) The future of waste management in smart and sustainable cities: a review and concept paper. Waste Manag 81:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison TM, Sayogo DS (2014) Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: a comparative study. Govern Inf Q 31(4):513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefnawy A, Bouras A, Cherifi C (2015) Lifecycle based modeling of smart city ecosystem. In: The 14th international conference on information and knowledge engineering

  • Helfert M, Donnellan B, Ostrowski L (2012) The case for design science utility and quality-evaluation of design science artifact within the sustainable ict capability maturity framework. Syst Signs Actions: Int J Inf Technol Action Commun Workpract 6(1):46–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfert M, Bastidas V, Pourzolfaghar Z (2018) Digital and smart services–the application of enterprise architecture. In: International conference on digital transformation and global society. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 277–288

  • Horkoff J, Jeusfeld MA, Ralyté J, Karagiannis D (2018) Enterprise modeling for business agility. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO37120 (2014) Iso 37120:2014 - sustainable development of communities–indicators for city services and quality of life. In: International standards ISO37120, first edition, International Organization for Standardization

  • Janssens L, Bazhenova E, De Smedt J, Vanthienen J, Denecker M (2016) Consistent integration of decision (dmn) and process (bpmn) models. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE’16 forum, at the 28th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2016), CEUR-WS. org, vol 1612, pp 121–128

  • Jureta IJ, Herssens C, Faulkner S (2009) A comprehensive quality model for service-oriented systems. Softw Qual J 17(1):65–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakarontzas G, Anthopoulos L, Chatzakou D, Vakali A (2014) A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities: A survey based approach. In: 2014 11th international conference on e-business (ice-b), IEEE, pp 47–54

  • Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? big data and smart urbanism. Geo J 79(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankhorst MM (2004) Enterprise architecture modelling - the issue of integration. Adv Eng Inform 18(4):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara P, Sánchez M, Villalobos J (2019) Ot modeling: The enterprise beyond it. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61(4):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lnenicka M, Machova R, Komarkova J, Pasler M (2017) Government enterprise architecture for big and open linked data analytics in a smart city ecosystem. In: International conference on smart education and smart e-learning. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 475–485

  • Loo BP, Tang WS (2019) “mapping” smart cities. J Urban Technol 26(2):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma M, Preum SM, Tarneberg W, Ahmed M, Ruiters M, Stankovic J (2016) Detection of runtime conflicts among services in smart cities. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on smart computing (smartcomp), IEEE, pp 1–10

  • Mamkaitis A, Bezbradica M, Helfert M (2016) Urban enterprise: a review of smart city frameworks from an enterprise architecture perspective. In: 2016 IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2), IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Matheus R, Janssen M, Maheshwari D (2018) Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Govern Inf Q

  • McGinley T, Nakata K (2015) A community architecture framework for smart cities. Citizen’s right to the digital city. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 231–252

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meth H, Mueller B, Maedche A (2015) Designing a requirement mining system. J Assoc Inf Syst 16(9):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelucci FV, De Marco A, Tanda A (2016) Defining the role of the smart-city manager: an analysis of responsibilities and skills. J Urban Technol 23(3):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody D (2009) The “physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transact Softw Eng 35(6):756–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti P, De Marco A, Cagliano AC, Mangano G, Scorrano F (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities 38:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesi P, Badii C, Bellini P, Cenni D, Martelli G, Paolucci M (2016) Km4city smart city api: an integrated support for mobility services. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on smart computing (smartcomp), IEEE, pp 1–8

  • Object Management Group (2015) Business motivation model, version 1.3. (2015)

  • Oktaria D, Kurniawan NB, et al. (2017) Smart city services: A systematic literature review. In: 2017 international conference on information technology systems and innovation (ICITSI), IEEE, pp 206–213

  • Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 24(3):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez González D, Díaz Díaz R (2015) Public services povided with ict in the smart city environment: The case of spanish cities. J Univ Comput Sci 21(2):248–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen SA, Pourzolfaghar Z, Alloush I, Ahlers D, Krogstie J, Helfert M (2019) Value-added services, virtual enterprises and data spaces inspired enterprise architecture for smart cities. In: Working conference on virtual enterprises, pp 393–402

  • Pfeiffer D (2007) Constructing comparable conceptual models with domain specific languages. European conference on information systems ECIS

  • Pourzolfaghar Z, Helfert M (2017) Taxonomy of smart elements for designing effective services. In: Twenty-third americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Boston, pp 1–10

  • Pourzolfaghar Z, Bastidas V, Helfert M (2019) Standardisation of enterprise architecture development for smart cities. J Knowl Econ pp 1–22

  • Purohit L, Kumar S (2019) Web services in the internet of things and smart cities: a case study on classification techniques. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 8(2):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas E, Bastidas V, Cabrera C (2020) Cities-board: a framework to automate the development of smart cities dashboards. IEEE Internet Things J pp 1–9

  • Rurua N, Eshuis R, Razavian M (2019) Representing variability in enterprise architecture. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61(2):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sá F, Rocha Á, Cota MP (2016) Potential dimensions for a local e-government services quality model. Telemat Inform 33(2):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarikaya A, Correll M, Bartram L, Tory M, Fisher D (2018) What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE Transact Visual Comput Graph 25(1):682–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher JM, Vögler M, Dustdar S, Inzinger C (2016) Application architecture for the internet of cities: Blueprints for future smart city applications. IEEE Internet Comput 20(6):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte NA, Gellenbeck K, Nelles M (2017) Operationalisation of service quality in household waste collection. Waste Manag 62:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks G, Gloet M, Someh IA, Frampton K, Tamm T (2018) Achieving benefits with enterprise architecture. J Strateg Inf Syst 27(2):139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva N, Sousa P, da Silva MM (2021) Maintenance of enterprise architecture models. Bus Inf Syst Eng 63(2):157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Lynch F, Helfert M (2021) Role of citizens in the development of smart cities: Benefit of citizen’s feedback for improving quality of service. In: Smartgreens, pp 35–44

  • The Open Group (2017) Archimate® 3.0.1 specification. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/, Accessed 18 Sept 2019

  • The Open Group (2018) Togaf® standard version 9.2

  • Visic N, Fill HG, Buchmann RA, Karagiannis D (2015) A domain-specific language for modeling method definition: From requirements to grammar. In: 2015 IEEE 9th international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS), IEEE, pp 286–297

  • Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant eis. Inf Syst Res 3(1):36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M, Podnar Žarko I (2019) A regulatory view on smart city services. Sensors 19(2):415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q pp xiii–xxiii

  • Yeh H (2017) The effects of successful ict-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Govern Inf Q 34(3):556–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylinen M, Pekkola S (2019) A process model for public sector it management to answer the needs of digital transformation. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences

  • Zachman JA (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdraveski V, Mishev K, Trajanov D, Kocarev L (2017) Iso-standardized smart city platform architecture and dashboard. IEEE Pervasive Comput 16(2):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuhadar L, Thrasher E, Marklin S, de Pablos PO (2017) The next wave of innovation - review of smart cities intelligent operation systems. Comput Hum Behav 66:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Sandwich Program Fellowship funded by the Council for Higher Education of Israel. This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grant 13/RC/2094_P2 and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund through the Southern & Eastern Regional Operational Programme to Lero - the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software (www.lero.ie). The authors want to acknowledge the valuable help and support from the participants and members of the Federation of Local Authorities in Israel, especially to the CEO, Shlomo Dolberg. Sincere thanks to Netanya Municipality to allow us to conduct the case study and for their insightful and invaluable feedback which helped in evolving this article. Special thanks to Miriam Feirberg Ikar, mayor of Netanya, Yoram Cohen, CEO of Netanya, and Lizi Oron, Director of Municipal Operation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

    Viviana Bastidas & Iris Reychav

  2. Department of Computer Science, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

    Viviana Bastidas

  3. Smart City and Digital Domain Management, Netanya Municipality, Netanya, Israel

    Alon Ofir

  4. School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Marija Bezbradica

  5. Innovation Value Institute, School of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

    Markus Helfert

Authors
  1. Viviana Bastidas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iris Reychav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alon Ofir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marija Bezbradica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus Helfert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viviana Bastidas.

Additional information

Accepted after 4 revisions by Jelena Zdravkovic.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1938 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastidas, V., Reychav, I., Ofir, A. et al. Concepts for Modeling Smart Cities. Bus Inf Syst Eng 64, 359–373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00724-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00724-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation