Abstract
The interaction between pine oil and marmatite without collectors and activators was investigated by flotation, scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive spectrometer (SEM–EDS), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, Zeta potential, and first-principle theory calculations. The flotation results show that marmatite exhibits considerable floatability with the addition of pine oil. SEM–EDS results show that carbon atomic ratios on the surface are significantly high, which suggests that the flotation of marmatite is caused by the adsorption of pine oil. Further evidence of the adsorption mechanism was given by IR, and Zeta potential examining pine oil depends on the physical adsorption on the surface independently. The first-principle theory calculations indicate that pine oil molecule adsorbs on Zn and Fe atom surfaces by ionic bond and covalent bond of adsorption energies of −1.23 and −1.51 eV, respectively. P orbital of O atom, s orbital of Zn atom, and d orbital of Fe are the major participants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liu RQ, Sun W, Hu YH, Wang DZ. New collectors for the flotation of unactivated marmatite. Miner Eng. 2010;23(2):99.
Gupta AK, Banerjee PK, Mishra A, Satish P. Effect of alcohol and polyglycol ether frothers on foam stability, bubble size and coal flotation. Int J Miner Process. 2007;82(3):126.
Wiese JG, Harris PJ, Bradshaw DJ. The effect of increased frother dosage on froth stability at high depressant dosages. Miner Eng. 2010;23(11–13):1010.
Cho YS, Laskowski JS. Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability. Int J Miner Process. 2002;64(2–3):69.
Uddin S, Li Y, Mirnezami M, Finch JA. Effect of particles on the electrical charge of gas bubbles in flotation. Miner Eng. 2012;36–38(10):160.
El Mahedy AM, Mirnezami M, Finch JA. The Zeta potential of bubble in the presence of frother. Int J Miner Process. 2008;89(1–4):40.
Wiese J, Harris P. The effect of frother type and dosage on flotation performance in the presence of high depressant concentrations. Miner Eng. 2012;36–38(10):204.
Barbian N, Hadler K, Ventura-Medina E, Cilliers JJ. The froth stability column: linking froth stability and flotation performance. Miner Eng. 2005;18(3):317.
Hadler K, Aktas Z, Cilliers JJ. The effects of frother and collector distribution on flotation performance. Miner Eng. 2005;18(2):171.
Melo F, Laskowski JS. Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation. Miner Eng. 2006;19(6–8):766.
Leja J, Schulman JH. Flotation theory: molecular interaction between frothers and collectors at solid-liquid-air interface. Miner Eng. 1954;16:221.
El-Shall H, Abdel-Khalek NA, Svoronos S. Collector-frother interaction in column flotation of Florida phosphate. Int J Miner Process. 2000;58(1–4):187.
Sun SY, Wang DZ, Li BD. Effects of frother on the collectorless flotation of sulphideores. J Cent Southinst Min Metall. 1992;23:670.
Payne MC, Teter MP, Allan DC, Arias TA, Joannopoulos JD. Reviews of modern physics. Phys Rep. 1992;64(4):1045.
Hu ZY, Yang Y, Sun B, Zhang P, Wang WC, Shao XH. Dissociations of O2 molecules on ultrathin Pb(111) films: first-principles plane wave calculations. Chin Phys B. 2012;21(1):016801.
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77(18):3965.
Vanderbilt D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys Rev B. 1990;41(11):7892.
Leppinen JO. FTIR and flotation investigation of the adsorption of ethyl xanthate on activated and non-activated sulfide minerals. Int J Miner Process. 1990;30(3–4):245.
Popov SR, Vučinić DR. The ethylxanthate adsorption on copper-activated sphalerite under flotation-related conditions in alkaline media. Int J Miner Process. 1990;30(3–4):229.
Grano SR, Sollaart M, Skinner W, Prestidge CA, Ralston J. Surface modifications in the chalcopyrite-sulphite ion system. I. collectorless flotation, XPS and dissolution study. Int J Miner Process. 1997;50(1–2):1.
Fornasiero D, Ralston J. Effect of surface oxide/hydroxide products on the collectorless flotation of copper-activated sphalerite. Int J Miner Process. 2006;78(4):231.
Song S, Lopez-Valdivieso A, Ding YQ. Effects of nonpolar oil on hydrophobic flocculation of hematite and rhodochrosite fines. Powder Technol. 1999;101(1):73.
Laskowski JS, Ralston J. Colloid chemistry in mineral processing. Int J Miner Process. 1994;41(1–2):161.
Mazzone DN, Tardos GI, Pfeffer R. The behavior of liquid bridges between two relatively moving particles. Powder Technol. 1987;51(1):71.
Chen JH. Principles of the Flotation Theory of Sulphide Minerals Bearing Lattice Defects. Changsha: Central South University Press; 2012. 56.
Hu WB. Flotation. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press; 1989. 85.
Dávila-Pulido GI, Uribe-Salas A. Effect of calcium, sulphate and gypsum on copper-activated and non-activated sphalerite surface properties. Miner Eng. 2014;55(1):147.
Finkelstein NP. The activation of sulphide minerals for flotation: a review. Int J Miner Process. 1997;52(2–3):81.
Sui C, Rashchi F, Xu Z, Kim J, Nesset JE, Finch JA. Interaction in the sphalerite–Ca–SO4–CO3 systems. Colloids Surf A. 1998;137(1–3):69.
Fornasiero D, Ralston J. Effect of surface oxide/hydroxide products on the collectorless flotation of copper-activated sphalerite. Int J Miner Process. 2006;78(4):231.
Ikumapayi FK. Flotation chemistry of complex sulphide ores: recycling of process water and flotation selectivity. Lulea, Sweden: Lulea University of Technology; 2010. 12.
Chandra AP, Gerson AR. A review of the fundamental studies of the copper activation mechanisms for selective flotation of the sulfide minerals, sphalerite and pyrite. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;145(1–2):97.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51174103).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, ZB., Tong, X., Valdivieso, A.L. et al. Collectorless flotation of marmatite with pine oil. Rare Met. 36, 147–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-015-0547-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-015-0547-9