Abstract
Supplier selection and order allocation are important keys for reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain networks especially with the presence of demand–supply imbalance risks. If such uncertainties and risks are not foreseen in the chain, and corresponding appropriate measures are not taken to handle them, irreparable damages would be expected consequently. The importance of this issue in closed-loop supply chains is more appreciated due to the importance and the effect of this chain on the environment. In this research, the disruption risk and the uncertainties related to the demand, market price, and the number of returned products are simultaneously considered. Purchasing from the backup suppliers and spot market are considered, to take the proper measures in case of uncertainties. Two-stage stochastic programming model is used to express the uncertainty. The decisions on the purchase from the uncertain suppliers, and reserving from backup suppliers are made in the first step. Then, after determining the uncertainties, return decisions (purchasing from the backup suppliers, spot market and the use of returned products) are made. Besides, we develop our model with CVaR risk measurement tool, and assess risk neutral and risk averse models. We also investigate how changes in the key problem parameters can affect sourcing strategies of a firm.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12597-020-00445-w/MediaObjects/12597_2020_445_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12597-020-00445-w/MediaObjects/12597_2020_445_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12597-020-00445-w/MediaObjects/12597_2020_445_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12597-020-00445-w/MediaObjects/12597_2020_445_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, N., Nahmias, S.: Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Prod. Oper. Manag. 6, 291–308 (1997)
Akella, R., Araman, V., Kleinknecht, J., Geunes, J., Pardalos, P., Romeijn, E.: B2B Markets: Procurement and Supplier Risk Management in e-Business. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Alamdar, S., Rabbani, M., Heydari, J.: Optimal decision problem in a three-level closed-loop supply chain with risk-averse players under demand uncertainty. Uncert. Supply Chain Manag. 7(2), 351–368 (2019)
Amin, S.H., Zhang, G.: An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 6782–6791 (2012)
Atasu, A., Guide, V.D.R., Wassenhove, L.N.: Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research. Prod. Oper. Manag. 17, 483–496 (2008)
Bagheri, F., Tarokh, M.: A fuzzy approach for multi-objective supplier selection. Int. J. Ind. Eng. 21, 1 (2010)
Birge, J.R., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Burke, G.J., Carrillo, J.E., Vakharia, A.J.: Sourcing decisions with stochastic supplier reliability and stochastic demand. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18, 475–484 (2009)
Cardoso, S.R., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.F., Relvas, S.: Design and planning of supply chains with integration of reverse logistics activities under demand uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226, 436–451 (2013)
Chahar, K., Taaffe, K.: Risk averse demand selection with all-or-nothing orders. Omega 37, 996–1006 (2009)
Charter, M., Gray, C.: Remanufacturing and product design: Designing for the 7th generation (2007)
Chopra, S., Reinhardt, G., Mohan, U.: The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Res. Logist. (NRL) 54, 544–555 (2007)
Elmaghraby, W.J.: Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2, 350–371 (2000)
Fleischmann, M.: Quantititative Models for Reverse Logistics: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Germany (2001)
Fu, Q., Lee, C.-Y., Teo, C.-P.: Procurement management using option contracts: random spot price and the portfolio effect. IIE Trans. 42, 793–811 (2010)
Ghomi Avili, M., Jalali Naeini, S.G., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Jabbarzadeh, A.: Applying a CVaR measure for a stochastic competitive closed-loop supply chain network under disruption. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 11(4), 56–73 (2018)
Giri, B., Sharma, S.: Optimal production policy for a closed-loop hybrid system with uncertain demand and return under supply disruption. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 2015–2028 (2016)
Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D.: Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240, 603–626 (2015)
Guo, J., He, L., Gen, M.: Optimal strategies for the closed-loop supply chain with the consideration of supply disruption and subsidy policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 128, 886–893 (2019)
Han, X., Wu, H., Yang, Q., Shang, J.: Collection channel and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing cost disruption. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(4), 1147–1167 (2017)
Hasani, A., Zegordi, S.H., Nikbakhsh, E.: Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50, 4649–4669 (2012)
Hishamuddin, H., Sarker, R.A., Essam, D.: A recovery mechanism for a two echelon supply chain system under supply disruption. Econ. Model. 38, 555–563 (2014)
Hou, J., Zeng, A.Z., Zhao, L.: Make-to-order contract with a backup supplier under recurrent supply uncertainties and disruption risks. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 5, 4479–4489 (2009)
Hou, J., Zeng, A.Z., Zhao, L.: Coordination with a backup supplier through buy-back contract under supply disruption. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 46, 881–895 (2010)
Jabbarzadeh, A., Haughton, M., Khosrojerdi, A.: Closed-loop supply chain network design under disruption risks: a robust approach with real world application. Comput. Ind. Eng. 116, 178–191 (2018)
Kleywegt, A.J., Shapiro, A., Homem-De-mello, T.: The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 479–502 (2002)
Li, J., Wang, S., Cheng, T.E.: Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124, 137–150 (2010)
Listeş, O.: A generic stochastic model for supply-and-return network design. Comput. Oper. Res. 34, 417–442 (2007)
Mak, W.-K., Morton, D.P., Wood, R.K.: Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 24, 47–56 (1999)
Melo, M.T., Nickel, S., Saldanha-Da-gama, F.: Facility location and supply chain management—a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196, 401–412 (2009)
Merzifonluoglu, Y.: Risk averse supply portfolio selection with supply, demand and spot market volatility. Omega 57, 40–53 (2015)
Merzifonluoglu, Y., Feng, Y.: Newsvendor problem with multiple unreliable suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52, 221–242 (2014)
Minner, S.: Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: a review. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 81, 265–279 (2003)
Moghaddam, K.S.: Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 6237–6254 (2015)
Norkin, V.I., Pflug, G.C., Ruszczyński, A.: A branch and bound method for stochastic global optimization. Math. Program. 83, 425–450 (1998)
Nukala, S., Gupta, S.M.: A fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supplier selection in a closed-loop supply chain network. In: Proceedings of the 2007 POMS-Dallas meeting, 2007, pp. 4–7 (2007)
Pishvaee, M.S., Jolai, F., Razmi, J.: A stochastic optimization model for integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. J. Manuf. Syst. 28, 107–114 (2009)
Ponte, B., Naim, M.M., Syntetos, A.A.: The effect of returns volume uncertainty on the dynamic performance of closed-loop supply chains. J. Remanuf. 1, 1–14 (2019)
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–42 (2000)
Saghafian, S., van Oyen, M.P.: The value of flexible backup suppliers and disruption risk information: newsvendor analysis with recourse. IIE Trans. 44, 834–867 (2012)
Santoso, T., Ahmed, S., Goetschalckx, M., Shapiro, A.: A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167, 96–115 (2005)
Sawik, B.: Bi-criteria portfolio optimization models with percentile and symmetric risk measures by mathematical programming. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 88, 176–180 (2012)
Sawik, T.: Supplier selection in make-to-order environment with risks. Math. Comput. Model. 53, 1670–1679 (2011)
Sawik, T.: Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 41, 259–269 (2013)
Sawik, T.: Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: single vs. dual sourcing. Omega 43, 83–95 (2014)
Shi, J., Zhang, G., Sha, J.: Optimal production planning for a multi-product closed loop system with uncertain demand and return. Comput. Oper. Res. 38, 641–650 (2011)
Shi, J., Zhang, G., Sha, J., Amin, S.H.: Coordinating production and recycling decisions with stochastic demand and return. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 19, 385–407 (2010)
Singhal, P., Agarwal, G., Mittal, M.L.: Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management 6, 1 (2011)
Toffel, M.W.: Strategie management of product recovery. Calif. Manag. Rev. 46, 120–141 (2004)
Torabi, S., Baghersad, M., Mansouri, S.: Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 79, 22–48 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rezaei, S., Ghalehkhondabi, I., Rafiee, M. et al. Supplier selection and order allocation in CLSC configuration with various supply strategies under disruption risk. OPSEARCH 57, 908–934 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00445-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00445-w