Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated decision making model for pricing and locating the customer order decoupling point of a newsvendor supply chain

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multi-product two echelon supply chain within a newsvendor framework is studied, in which semi-finished products are produced by a supplier and customized according to specific customer orders. The focus of this paper is to investigate a situation where the manufacturer wishes to determine the fraction of production performed by the supplier, its optimal semi-finished product order size, and price for each product type. In order to make the problem more practical, capacity and budget constraints are considered. The computability of the presented model is explored by a numerical example with Poisson arrival demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreev, O.D., Koleva, N.V.: Opportunities for Applying Customer Order Decoupling Point Approach. The European Entrepreneurship, How Entrepreneurs (Should) Act in Global Business Environment (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreev, O., Panayotova, T.: Customer order decoupling point issues in a project environment. Serbian J. Manag. 8(2), 243–253 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyaci, T., Ray, S.: Product differentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 5(1), 18–36 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carr, S., Duenyas, I.: Optimal admission control and sequencing in a make-to-stock/make-to-order production system. Oper. Res. 48(5), 709–720 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dada, M., Hu, Q.: Financing newsvendor inventory. Oper. Res. Lett. 36(5), 569–573 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Federgruen, A., Katalan, Z.: Impact of adding a make-toorder item to a make-to-stock production system. Manag. Sci. 45(7), 980–994 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feitzinger, E., Lee, H.: Mass customization at Hewlett Packard: the power of postponement. Harv. Bus. Rev. 75, 116–121 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, M., Ramdas, K., Ulrich, K.: Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems. Manag. Sci. 45(3), 297–315 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geunes, J.P., Ramasesh, R.V., Hayya, J.C.: Adapting the newsvendor model for infinite-horizon inventory systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 72(3), 237–250 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, D., Benjaafar, S.: Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation? A common framework for modeling and analysis. IIE Trans. 36(6), 529–546 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadley, G., Whitin, T.M.: Analysis of Inventory Syst. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison, J.M., Van Mieghem, J.A.: Multi-resource investment strategies: operational hedging under demand uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 113(1), 17–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoekstra, S., Romme, J.: Integral Logistic Structures: Developing Customer-Oriented Goods Flow. Industrial Press Inc, Norwalk (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jewkes, E.M., Alfa, A.S.: A queueing model of delayed product differentiation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 734–743 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keren, B.: The single-period inventory problem: extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega 37(4), 801–810 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khouja, M.: A note on the newsboy problem with an emergency supply option. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47(12), 1530–1534 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, H.L.: Effective inventory and service management through product and process redesign. Oper. Res. 44(1), 151–159 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, H.L., Tang, C.S.: Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Manag. Sci. 43(1), 40–53 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, W., Mo, Y., Yang, Y., Ye, Z.: Decision model of customer order decoupling point on multiple customer demands in logistics service supply chain. Prod. Plan. Control 26(3), 178–202 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lodree, E.J., Kim, Y., Jang, W.: Time and quantity dependent waiting costs in a newsvendor problem with backlogged shortages. Math. Comput. Model. 47(1), 60–71 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., Towill, D.R.: Engineering the leagile supply chain. Int. J. Agile Manag. Syst. 2(1), 54–61 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Niederhoff, J.A.: Using separable programming to solve the multi-product multiple ex-ante constraint newsvendor problem and extensions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2), 941–955 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olhager, J.: Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 85(3), 319–329 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Olhager, J., Östlund, B.: An integrated push-pull manufacturing strategy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 45(2), 135–142 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pagh, J.D., Cooper, M.C.: Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy. J. Bus. Logist. 19, 13–34 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pagh, J.D., Cooper, M.C.: Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy. J. Bus. Logist. 19, 13–34 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parlar, M., Wang, D.: Diversification under yield randomness in inventory models. Eur J. Oper. Res. 66(1), 52–64 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pine, B.J.: Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sahin, E., Dallery, Y.: Assessing the impact of inventory inaccuracies within a newsvendor framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(3), 1108–1118 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharman, G.: The rediscovery of logistics. Harv. Bus. Rev. 62(5), 71–79 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shidpour, H., Da Cunha, C., Bernard, A.: Analyzing single and multiple customer order decoupling point positioning based on customer value: a multi-objective approach. Proced. CIRP 17, 669–674 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Silver, E., Pyke, D.F., Peterson, R.: Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Teimoury, E., Modarres, M., Khondabi, I.G., Fathi, M.: A queuing approach for making decisions about order penetration point in multiechelon supply chains. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 63(1–4), 359–371 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsay, A.A., Agrawal, N.: Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2(4), 372–391 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Donk, D.P.: Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 69(3), 297–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mieghem, J.A.V., Rudi, N.: Newsvendor networks: inventory management and capacity investment with discretionary activities. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 4(4), 313–335 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vanteddu, G., Chinnam, R.B.: Supply chain focus dependent sensitivity of the point of product differentiation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(17), 4984–5001 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, K., Wang, E.: Optimal control of decoupling point with deteriorating items. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 7(5), 1368–1384 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yano, C.A., Lee, H.L.: Lot sizing with random yields: a review. Oper. Res. 43(2), 311–334 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou, L., Li, M.: Location of customer order decoupling point in the supply chain of deteriorated food based on dynamic model. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 6(2), 254–258 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iman Ghalehkhondabi.

Appendices

Appendix 1

As \(\lambda_{i}\) denotes the demand rate for product \(i\), it is obvious that it only takes the nonnegative values. By assuming \(\lambda_{i} \ge 0\), we will have (13) and (14):

$$\alpha_{i} - \beta_{P} P_{i} + \gamma_{P} (P_{j} - P_{i} ) - \beta_{K} K_{i} + \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{j} - K_{i} ) \ge 0$$
(13)
$$P_{j} \ge \frac{{(\beta_{P} + \gamma_{P} )P_{i} }}{{\gamma_{P} }} + \frac{{\beta_{K} K_{i} - \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{j} - K_{i} ) - \alpha_{i} }}{{\gamma_{P} }}$$
(14)

If we consider \(\frac{{(\beta_{P} + \gamma_{P} )}}{{\gamma_{P} }} = a_{1}\) and \(\frac{{\beta_{K} K_{i} - \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{j} - K_{i} ) - \alpha_{i} }}{{\gamma_{P} }} = b_{1}\), we can write (13) as (14):

$$P_{j} \ge a_{1} P_{i} + b_{1}$$
(15)

By the same assumption for \(\lambda_{j} \ge 0\), we will have (16) and (17):

$$\alpha_{j} - \beta_{P} P_{j} + \gamma_{P} (P_{i} - P_{j} ) - \beta_{K} K_{j} + \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{i} - K_{j} ) \ge 0$$
(16)
$$P_{i} \ge \frac{{(\beta_{P} + \gamma_{P} )P_{j} }}{{\gamma_{P} }} + \frac{{\beta_{K} K_{j} - \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{i} - K_{j} ) - \alpha_{j} }}{{\gamma_{P} }}$$
(17)

If we consider \(\frac{{(\beta_{P} + \gamma_{P} )}}{{\gamma_{P} }} = a_{2}\) and \(\frac{{\beta_{K} K_{j} - \gamma_{K}^{{}} (K_{i} - K_{j} ) - \alpha_{j} }}{{\gamma_{P} }} = b_{2}\), we can write (17) as (18):

$$P_{i} \ge a_{2} P_{j} + b_{2} \, \Rightarrow \,\frac{{P_{i} - b_{2} }}{{a_{2} }} \ge P_{j}$$
(18)

By replacing (18) in (15), we will find the upper bound of \(P_{i}\) as (19):

$$\frac{{P_{i} - b_{2} }}{{a_{2} }} \ge a_{1} P_{i} + b_{1} \, \Rightarrow \,\frac{{b_{1} a_{2} + b_{2} }}{{1 - a_{1} a_{2} }} \ge P_{i}$$
(19)

By using the same procedure and replacing (18) in (15), we will find the upper bound of \(P_{j}\) as (20):

$$\frac{{P_{j} - b_{1} }}{{a_{1} }} \ge a_{2} P_{j} + b_{2} \, \Rightarrow \,\frac{{b_{2} a_{1} + b_{1} }}{{1 - a_{1} a_{2} }} \ge P_{j}$$
(20)

Appendix 2

In the sensitivity analysis section, both completion percentages are assumed to be equal and increase simultaneously, so we can assume \(\theta_{1} = \theta_{2} = \theta\), and for the first product, we have (21):

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda_{1} &= 14 - 0.15P_{1} + 0.1(P_{2} - P_{1} ) - 0.12K_{1} \hfill \\ &\quad+\,0.1(K_{2} - K_{1} ) \hfill \\ \end{aligned}$$
(21)

By inserting \(K_{1} (\theta_{1} ) = 1 - \theta\) and \(K_{2} (\theta_{2} ) = 1.2(1 - \theta )\) to 21, we will have (22):

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda_{1} &= 14 - 0.15P_{1} + 0.1(P_{2} - P_{1} ) - 0.12(1 - \theta ) \hfill \\ &\quad+\,0.1(1.2(1 - \theta ) - (1 - \theta )) \hfill \\ \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Considering \(\beta = 14 - 0.15P_{1} + 0.1(P_{2} - P_{1} )\) as a constant value, we will have (23):

$$\lambda_{1} = \beta - 0.1 + 0.1\theta$$
(23)

(23) shows that \(\lambda_{1}\) is an increasing function of \(\theta\). The same procedure can be applied for \(\lambda_{2}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghalehkhondabi, I., Ardjmand, E. & Weckman, G. Integrated decision making model for pricing and locating the customer order decoupling point of a newsvendor supply chain. OPSEARCH 54, 417–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0286-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-016-0286-1

Keywords

Navigation