Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Steel Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete Lined (SFRS) Tunnel: A Himalayan Case Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

The entire Himalayan arc is predicted to produce a series of significant earthquakes and the subsequent great earthquakes of magnitude 8.0 and higher. A substantial amount of rock tunneling is being carried out in the Himalayan region to meet the growing demand for transportation, power, and other infrastructure projects. Earthquake forces influence the final design of the tunnel, which requires further strengthening of the concrete lining and improvement in tunnel support. Because of increasing importance, it is essential to combine the dynamic forces and displacements produced by seismic ground movements into the design stage for tunnels. In this paper, a numerical analysis has been carried out to assess the seismic performance of a proposed hydropower tunnel of 8.8m diameter (horseshoe-shape) in Uttarakhand, India. The impact of earthquakes on underground structures such as tunnels is often considered to be insignificant. However, the results of this study show how that stress from seismic loads can be damaging to the stability of the tunnel. In this study, a pseudo-static approach was adopted to assess the impact of the earthquake on the tunnel lining for the sections located in different rocks namely slate (Q=3.4), quartzite (Q=6), and dolomitic limestone (Q=5.2), respectively. Pseudo-static analysis findings suggest there is a 35% increase in the lining forces for an impact of earthquake for the tunnel section situated in Slate. Furthermore, displacements and damage-prone areas are determined to assess the damage to the tunnel, which could be helpful for rapid evaluations of potential future damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abokhalil, M. (2007) Master’s Thesis in Geosciences, Insights into the response of rock tunnels to seismicity. Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo.

  • Barton, N.R., Lien, R., Lunde, J. (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech., v.4, pp.189–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N. (1984) Effects of rock mass deformation on tunnel performance in seismic regions. Adv. Tunneling Tech. Subsurface Use, v.4.3, pp.89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Sharma, M.L., Narayan, J.P., Shrikhande, M. and Das, J. (2005) EQ:2005–25 Site specific earthquake parameters for Vishnugad-Pipalkoti HE project, Uttaranchal, Department of Earthquake Engineering, IIT Rookee

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhasin, R., Hoeg, K., Abokhalil, M. (2008) Effect of seismicity on rock support in tunnels, World Tunnel Congress-2008.

  • Bilotta, E., Lanzano, G., Russo, G., Santucci de Magistris, F., Aiello, V., Conte, E.F.S. and Valentino, M. (2007) Pseudostatic and dynamic analyses of tunnels in transversal and longitudinal direction. In: Proceeding of the fourth international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, Paper no.1550.

  • Carranza-Torres, C. (2004) Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. In: Hudson, J.A., Xia-Ting, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of ISRM SINOROCK 2004 Symp., China. Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.41(3), pp.480–481.

  • Carranza-Torres, C. (2009) Analytical and numerical study of the mechanics of rockbolt reinforcement around tunnels in rock masses. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., v.42(2), pp.175–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, S.U. (2016) Response of marmaray submerged tunnel during 2014 Northern Aegean Earthquake (Mw=6.9). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Eng., v.90, pp.15–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikshit, A., Satyam, N., Pradhan, B. (2019) Estimation of rainfall-induced landslides using the TRIGRS model. Earth Syst. Environ., v.3(3), pp.575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, P., Mei, S., Zhang, J. et al. (2019) Study on seismic performance of shield tunnels under combined effect of axial force and bending moment in the longitudinal direction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.91, 103004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R.K. (2001) Status of tunnelling and underground construction activities and technologies in India. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.16.2, pp.63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R.K., Jethwa, J.L. and Paithankar, A.G. (1995) Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.10.1, pp.97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimstad, E., Kankes, K., Bhasin, R., Magnussen, A.W. and Kaynia, A. (2002) Rock mass quality Q used in designing reinforced ribs of sprayed concrete and energy absorption. Report, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.

  • Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., Yao, J.-C. (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.16(4), pp.247–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, Evert, and Edwin T. Brown (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Internat. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.34.8, pp.1165–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1981) Rock characterization testing and monitoring. ISRM suggested method. Int. Soc. Rock Mech. 211.

  • Jena, R., Pradhan, B. (2020) A Model for Visual Assessment of Fault Plane Solutions and Active Tectonics Analysis Using the Global Centroid Moment Tensor Catalog. Earth Syst. Environ., v.4, pp.197–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-019-00142-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiani, Majid, Tohid Akhlaghi, Abbas Ghalandarzadeh (2016) Experimental modeling of segmental shallow tunnels in alluvial affected by normal faults. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.51, pp.108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontoe, S. et al. (2008) Case study on seismic tunnel response. Canadian Geotech. Jour., v. 45.12, pp.1743–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korup, Oliver, Alexander L. Strom, and Johannes T. Weidinger (2006) Fluvial response to large rock-slope failures: Examples from the Himalayas, the Tien Shan, and the Southern Alps in New Zealand. Geomorphology, v.78(1–2), pp.3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, K. (2016) Geotechnical Investigations of Vishnugarh Pipalkoti HYDEL project, Garhwal, India, PhD Thesis.

  • Lee, Tae-Hyung, et al. (2016) Damage analysis of cut-and-cover tunnel structures under seismic loading. Bull. Earthquake Eng., v.14(2), pp.413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, Mohammad, Mohammad Farouq Hossaini, and Heydar Bagloo (2017) Rock bolt supporting factor: rock bolting capability of rock mass. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., v.76(1), pp.231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, Youjun, et al. (2016) Advances in two-dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis for rock-mass dynamics. Internat. Jour. Geomech., v.17(5), E6016001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, Malaya K., et al. (2014) Engineering geological and geotechnical investigations along the head race tunnel in Teesta Stage-III hydroelectric project, India. Eng. Geol., v.181, pp.297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panthi, Krishna Kanta (2012) Evaluation of rock bursting phenomena in a tunnel in the Himalayas. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. v.71(4) 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Wenge, et al. (2018) Seismic vulnerability analysis of rock mountain tunnel. Internat. Jour. Geomech., v.18(3), 04018002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A., Argles, T., Harris, N. et al. (2005) Himalayan architecture constrained by isotopic tracers from clastic sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v.236, pp.773–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc. (2001). Phase2 Program reference Manual.

  • Roy, Nishant, Rajib Sarkar, and Shiv Dayal Bharti (2018) Prediction model for performance evaluation of tunnel excavation in blocky rock mass. Internat. Jour. Geomech., v.18(1), 04017125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Wulf, and Harald Lauffer (2012) NATM—from a construction method to a system/NÖT—von der Bauweise zum System. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, v.5(5), pp.455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanghart, W., Ryan, M., Korup (2018) Topographic and Seismic Constraints on the Vulnerability of Himalayan Hydropower. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079173.

  • Sedarat, H., et al. (2009) Contact interface in seismic analysis of circular tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.24(4), pp.482–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M.L., Lindholm, C. (2012) Earthquake hazard assessment for Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, including a characteristic earthquake recurrence model for the Himalaya Frontal Fault (HFF). Pure Appl. Geophys., v.169(9), pp.1601–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivarajan, T.K. (2016) Seismic load considerations in the design of underground structures for hydropower projects in the Himalayan region. Recent Advances in Rock Engineering (RARE 2016). Atlantis Press.

  • Srivastav, A., and Neelima Satyam (2020) Understanding the impact of the earthquake on circular tunnels in different rock mass: a numerical approach. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, v.5(1), pp.1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q.Q., Dias, D. (2019) Assessment of stress relief during excavation on the seismic tunnel response by the pseudo-static method. Soil Dynam. Earthquake Eng., v.117, pp.384–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Thije, R.H.W. (2007) Remko Akkerman, and J. Huétink. Large deformation simulation of anisotropic material using an updated Lagrangian finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, v.196(33–34), pp.3141–3150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, V.C., Sriram, V. and Mundepi, A.K. (2000) Seismotectonics of the great 1905 Kangra earthquake meizoseismal region in Kangra—Chamba, NW Himalaya. Tectonophysics, v.326(3–4), pp.289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tshering, T. (2011) Master’s Thesis in Geosciences, The impact of earthquake on tunnels in different rockmass quality Q: A numerical analysis. Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo

  • Verma, A.K., Singh, T.N. (2010) Assessment of tunnel instability—a numerical approach. Arab Jour. Geosci., v.3, pp.181–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0066-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, Mithila, Anup K. Sutar, and Bansal, B.K. (2017) Source parameters of 1 st April 2015 Chamoli earthquake (Mw 4.8) vis-à-vis seismotectonics of the region. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.89(5), pp.491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (1996) Ground response of circular tunnel in poorly consolidated rock. Jour Geotech. Eng., v.122, pp.703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.N., Munfakh, G.A. (2001) Seismic design of tunnels. v.57, WIT Press.

  • Yadav, Rajeev Kumar, et al. (2019) Strong seismic coupling underneath Garhwal-Kumaun region, NW Himalaya, India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v.506, pp.8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. (2000) Applicability of Mohr—Coulomb and Hoek-Brown strength criteria to the dynamic strength of brittle rock. International Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., v.37(7), pp.1115–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, Yan, et al. (2017) A pseudo-static method for seismic responses of underground frame structures subjected to increasing excitations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Tech., v.65, pp.106–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 500 032, India

    Ambika Srivastav

  2. Discipline of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Simrol, Indore, India

    Neelima Satyam

  3. Laboratory for Spatial Informatics, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 500 032, India

    K. S. Rajan

Authors
  1. Ambika Srivastav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neelima Satyam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. S. Rajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastav, A., Satyam, N. & Rajan, K.S. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Steel Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete Lined (SFRS) Tunnel: A Himalayan Case Study. J Geol Soc India 98, 185–192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-022-1957-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-022-1957-6

Search

Navigation