Skip to main content
Log in

Rheology of multiphase polymer blends with and without reactive compatibiliser: evaluation of interfacial tension using theoretical predictions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Plastics Technology

Abstract

The phase morphology and rheology of polyamide 12/polypropylene (PA12/PP) blends have been studied. Effects of blend ratio and reactive compatibilisation on the rheological properties of compatibilised and uncompatibilised blends were analysed. The viscosity ratio between the polymers was found to be sensitive to frequency. The complex viscosity and dynamic modulus increased with increase in the amount of compatibiliser, up to critical micelle concentration. The interfacial tension between the polymers was calculated from the storage modulus of the blends using Palierne and Choi-Schowalter models. It was found that the rheological properties of both compatibilised and uncompatibilised blends are intimately related to their phase morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oldroyd JG (1953) Elastic and viscous properties of emulsions and suspensions. Proc Roy Soc London A218:122–132. doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi SJ, Schowalter WR (1975) Rheological properties of nondilute suspensions of deformable particles. Phys Fluids 18:420–427. doi:10.1063/1.861167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graebling D, Froelich D, Muller R (1989) Viscoelastic properties of polydimethylsiloxane-polyoxyethylene blends in the melt. Emulsion model. J Rheol 33:1283–1291. doi:10.1122/1.550051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palierne JF (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204–214. doi:10.1007/BF01331356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gramespacher H, Meissner J (1992) Interfacial tension between polymer melts measured by shear oscillations of their blends. J Rheol 36:1127–1141. doi:10.1122/1.550304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bousmina M, Bataille P, Sapieha S, Schreiber HP (1995) Comparing the effect of corona treatment and block copolymer addition on rheological properties of polystyrene/polyethylene blends. J Rheol 39:499–517. doi:10.1122/1.550709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacroix C, Aressy M, Carreau PJ (1997) Linear viscoelastic behavior of molten polymer blends: a comparative study of the Palierne and Lee and Park models. Rheol Acta 36:416–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallego R, García-López D, López-Quintana S, Gobernado-Mitre I, Merino JC, Pastor JM (2008) Toughening of PA6/mEPDM blends by two methods of compounding, extruder and internal mixer: rheological, morphological and mechanical characterization. Polym Bull 60:665–675. doi:10.1007/s00289-008-0902-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ares A, Silva J, Maia JM, Barral L, Abad MJ (2009) Rheomechanical and morphological study of compatibilized PP/EVOH blends. Rheol Acta 48:993–1004. doi:10.1007/s00397-009-0381-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aravind I, Jose S, Ahn KH, Thomas S (2010) Rheology and morphology of polytrimethylene terephthalate/ethylene propylene diene monomer blends in the presence and absence of a reactive compatibilizer. Polym Eng Sci 50:1945–1955. doi:10.1002/pen.21723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maani A, Heuzey M-C, Carreau PJ (2011) Coalescence in thermoplastic olefin (TPO) blends under shear flow. Rheol Acta 50:881–895. doi:10.1007/s00397-010-0501-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Graebling D, Muller R, Palierne JF (1993) Linear viscoelastic behavior of some incompatible polymer blends in the melt. Interpretation of data with a model of emulsion of viscoelastic liquids. Macromolecules 26:320–329. doi:10.1021/ma00054a011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riemann R-E, Cantow H-J, Chr F (1997) Interpretation of a new interface-governed relaxation process in compatibilised polymer blends. Macromolecules 30:5476–5484. doi:10.1021/ma961814w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Asthana H, Jayaraman K (1999) Rheology of reactively compatibilised polymer blends with varying extent of interfacial reaction. Macromolecules 32:3412–3419. doi:10.1021/ma980181d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jafari SH, Yavari A, Asadinezhad A, Khonakdar HA, Bohme F (2005) Correlation of morphology and rheological response of interfacially modified PTT/m-LLDPE blends with varying extent of modification. Polymer 46:5082–5093. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva J, Machado AV, Maia J (2007) Rheological behavior of compatibilized and non-compatibilized PA6/EPM blends. Rheol Acta 46:1091–1097. doi:10.1007/s00397-007-0201-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee HG, Sung Y-T, Lee YK, Kim WN, Yoon HG, Lee HS (2009) Effects of PP-g-MAH on the mechanical, morphological and rheological properties of polypropylene and poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) blends. Macromol Res 17:417–423. doi:10.1007/BF03218883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taheri M, Morshedian J, Khonakdar HA (2011) Effect of compatibilizer on interfacial tension of SAN/EPDM blend as measured via relaxation spectrums calculated from Palierne and Choi–Schowalter models. Polym Bull 66:363–376. doi:10.1007/s00289-010-0336-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Mulla A, Alfadhel K, Qambar G, Shaban H (2013) Rheological study of recycled polypropylene–starch blends. Polym Bull 70:2599–2618. doi:10.1007/s00289-013-0977-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Favis BD (2000) In: Paul DR, Bucknall CB (eds) Polymer blends, vol 1. New York, Wiley Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  21. Everaert V, Aerts L, Groeninckx G (1999) Phase morphology development in immiscible PP/(PS/PPE) blends: Influence of melt viscosity ratio and blend composition. Polymer 40:6627–6644. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00048-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim WN, Denn MM (1992) Properties of a thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer with a flexible polymer (Vectra/PET). J Rheol 36:1477–1498. doi:10.1122/1.550269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung YT, Han MS, Hyun JC, Kim WN, Lee SS (2003) Rheological properties and interfacial tension of polypropylene poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) blend containing compatibiliser. Polymer 44:1681–1687. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00920-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Macaubas PHP, Demarquette NR (2001) Morphologies and interfacial tensions of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene blends modified with triblock copolymers. Polymer 42:2543–2554. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00655-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tschoegle NW (1989) The phenomenological theory of linear viscoelastic behaviour. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor GT (1932) The viscosity of a fluid containing small drops of another. Proc Roy Soc London A138:41–48. doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu S (1987) Formation of dispersed phase in incompatible blends: interfacial and rheological effects. Polym Eng Sci 27:335–343. doi:10.1002/pen.760270506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lepers JC, Favis BD, Tabar RJ (1997) The relative role of coalescence and interfacial tension in controlling dispersed phase size reduction during the compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene blends. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 35:2271–2280. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199710)35:14<2271::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang H, Favis BD, Yu YS, Eisenberg A (1999) Correlation between the interfacial tension and dispersed phase morphology in interfacially modified blends of LLDPE and PVC. Macromolecules 32:1637–1642. doi:10.1021/ma9805553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tokita N (1977) Analysis of morphology formation in elastomer blends. Rubber Chem Technol 50:292–300. doi:10.5254/1.3535144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Retsos H, Margiolaki I, Messaritaki A, Anastasiadis SH (2001) Interfacial tension in binary polymer blends in the presence of block copolymers: effects of additive MW. Macromolecules 34:5295–5305. doi:10.1021/ma002105s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Anastasiadis SH (2011) Interfacial tension in binary polymer blends and the effects of copolymers as emulsifying agents. Adv Polym Sci 238:179–269. doi:10.1007/12_2010_81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cerclé C, Favis BD (2012) Generalizing interfacial modification in polymer blends. Polymer 53:4338–4343. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas S, Groeninckx G (1999) Reactive compatibilization of heterogeneous ethylene propylene rubber (EPM)/nylon 6 blends by the addition of compatibiliser precursor EPM-g-MA. Polymer 40:5799–5819. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00813-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Puyvelde P, Oommen Z, Koets P, Groeninckx G, Moldenaers P (2003) Effect of reactive compatibilization on the interfacial slip in nylon-6/EPR blends. Polym Eng Sci 43:71–77. doi:10.1002/pen.10006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JK, Kim S, Park CE (1997) Compatibilization mechanism of polymer blends with an in-situ compatibilizer. Polymer 38:2155–2164. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00750-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seno Jose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jose, S., Thomas, S., Aravind, I. et al. Rheology of multiphase polymer blends with and without reactive compatibiliser: evaluation of interfacial tension using theoretical predictions. Int J Plast Technol 18, 223–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-014-9075-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-014-9075-y

Keywords

Navigation