Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expert-based ex-ante assessments of potential social, ecological, and economic impacts of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania using the ScalA-FS approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subsistence farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are highly vulnerable to food insecurity given their low adaptive capacity against ecological and socio-economic shocks. Therefore, food security is one of their main challenges. Participatory action research across food value chains (FVCs) can help stabilize and enhance food security by developing upgrading strategies (UPS) that enhance specific aspects of crop production, post-harvest processing, marketing, income generation, and consumption. However, prior to their widespread adoption or upscaling, UPS need holistic understandings of their potential social, ecological, economic, and institutional challenges and opportunities in target areas. This article reports the application of the “ScalA-FS” tool, which assessed the potential success of selected UPS using assessment criteria developed by agricultural scientists and local farmers in a participatory process in Tanzania. This work is embedded in a larger participatory research project conducted in semi-arid and sub-humid ecological settings of the Dodoma and Morogoro regions of Tanzania. Results from the assessment of the potential impact of the UPS differed strongly between the UPS and the social, economic and environmental assessment criteria, but only slightly between semi-arid and sub-humid regions. The positive impacts of food-securing UPS centre on productivity and income generation. Rain water harvesting, fertilizer micro-dosing, optimized weeding, and promotion of kitchen gardens were expected to have the highest impacts after implementation. The ScalA-FS ex-ante assessments provide a knowledge base about potential impacts, as well as the potential bottlenecks to address during the implementation of UPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, E., Tyler, E., Wang, J., Siriri, D., & Modi, V. (2010). Field testing and survey evaluation of household biomass cookstoves in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agol, D., Latawiec, A. E., & Strassburg, B. B. N. (2014). Evaluating impacts of development and conservation projects using sustainability indicators: opportunities and challenges. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagayoko, M., Maman, N., Palé, S., Sirifi, S., Taonda, S. J. B., Traore, S., & Mason, S. C. (2011). Microdose and N and P fertilizer application rates for pearl millet in West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 1141–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bwalya, M., & Friedrich, T. (2002). Conservation agriculture in development: the case of Africa. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletto, C., Zezza, A., & Banerjee, R. (2013). Towards better measurement of household food security: harmonizing indicators and the role of household surveys. Global Food Security, 2(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Development, 22, 1253–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosyns, H., Damme, P. V., & Wulf, R. D. (2013). Who views what? Impact assessment through the eyes of farmers, development organization staff and researchers. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 20(4), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J., & Onumah, G. (2002). The role of warehouse receipt systems in enhanced commodity marketing and rural livelihoods in Africa. Food Policy, 27, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, W. D., & Gowda, C. L. L. (2013). Declining agricultural productivity and global food security. Journal of Crop Improvement, 27, 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erenstein, O. (2003). Smallholder conservation farming in the tropics and sub-tropics: a guide to the development and dissemination of mulching with crop residues and cover crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 100(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkossa, T., Haileslassie, A., & Macalister, C. (2014). Enhancing farming system water productivity through alternative land use and water management in vertisol areas of Ethiopian Blue Nile basin (Abay). Agricultural Water Management, 132, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2012). The state of food and agriculture: investing in agriculture for a better future. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD & WFP (2013). The state of food insecurity in the world 2013. The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome: FAO http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3434e/i3434e.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2011). A solution for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galhena, D., Freed, R., & Maredia, K. M. (2013). Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agriculture and Food Security, 2(1), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, M., & Clayton, T. (2012). Investing in Agricultural Water Management to Benefit Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania: AgWater Solutions Project Country Synthesis Report. IWMI.

  • Gómez, M. I., Barrett, C. B., Buck, L. E., De Groote, H., Ferris, S., & Gao, H. O. (2011). Research principles for developing country food value chains. Science, 332, 1154–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graef, F., Sieber, S., Mutabazi, K. D., Asch, F., Biesalski, H. K., Bitegeko, J., et al. (2014). Framework for participatory food security research in rural food value chains. Global Food Security, 3, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graef, F., Schneider, I., Fasse, A., Germer, J. U., Gevorgyan, E., Haule, F., et al. (2015). Assessment of upgrading strategies to improve regional food security in Tanzania: natural resource management and crop production. Outlook on Agriculture, 44(2), 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimble, R., & Chan, M. K. (1995). Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Natural Resources Forum, 19, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayelom, B. T. (2014). Advanced research on Striga control: a review. African Journal of Plant Science, 8(11), 492–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The future of small farms: trajectories and policy priorities. World Development, 38(10), 1349–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2008). Empowering farmers in Tanzania through the warehouse receipt system. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikelle, I. I., & Ivoms, O. S. P. (2014). Determination of the heating ability of coal and corn cob. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR JAC), 7(2), 77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaburire, L., Graef, F., Mutabazi, K., Makoko, B., & Swai, E. (2015). Multistakeholder Platforms for Sustainable Upgrading Agri-food Value Chains in Rural Tanzania: Creating a Space for Empowerment and Effective Engagement. Plant2030 status seminar, Berlin, Germany 4th–6th March 2015.

  • Kadigi, I. L., Muhiche, L., Kadigi, R. M. J., Makindara, J., Laswai, G., & Kashaigili, J. J. (2013). E- Ng ’ Ombe: a mobile phone ICT to tackle the pitfall of information asymmetry in the value chain of indigenous beef cattle in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Journal of Agriculture Economics and Rural Development, 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangalawe, R. Y. M., & Lyimo, J. G. (2013). Climate change, adaptive strategies and rural livelihoods in semiarid Tanzania. Natural Resources, 4, 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimaro, A. A., Timmer, V. R., Chamshama, S. O. A., Mugasha, A. G., & Kimaro, D. A. (2007). Nutrient use efficiency and biomass production of tree species for rotational woodlot systems in semi-arid Morogoro, Tanzania. Agroforestry Systems, 71, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimenye, L., & Bombom, A. (2009). Best-bet research outputs for enhancing agricultural productivity in eastern and Central Africa: abstracts. Entebbe: ASARECA.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, H. J., Sghaier, M., Schuler, J., Tonneau, J. P., Abdeladhim, M., Ounalli, N., Imbernon, J., Helming, K., Morris, J., & Wiggering, H. (2012). Participatory impact assessment of soil and water conservation scenarios in Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia. Environmental Management, 50, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, H. J., Uthes, S., Schuler, J., Zhen, L., Purushothaman, S., et al. (2013). Regional impact assessment of land use scenarios in developing countries using the FoPIA approach: findings from five case studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshirsagar, M. P., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2014). A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 580–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalith, A., Rao, P. & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). Report on Ex-Ante Evaluation of the Impact of Research Investment in Stay-Green Post-Rainy-Season Sorghum. ICRISAT Working Paper Series (51).

  • Leuenberger, H., & Wohlgemuth, N. (2006). Biofuels and energy security in Africa. Vienna: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liwenga, E. (2003). Food insecurity and coping strategies in semiarid areas: the case of Mvumi in Central Tanzania. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Ridaura, S., Van Keulen, H., Van Ittersum, M. K., & Leffelaar, P. A. (2005). Multiscale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A., Beringer, T., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., Rost, S., & Lucht, W. (2010). Scenarios of global bioenergy production: the trade-offs between agricultural expansion, intensification and trade. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2188–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoo, H. F., Kahimba, F. C., Mutabazi, K. D., Tumbo, S. D., et al. (2012). Adoption and up scaling of water harvesting technologies in Tanzania. Chapter 6. In W. Christley & J. Gowing (Eds.), Water harvesting technologies in SSA: state of the art. Routledge: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matumo, N. G., Maina, K. E., & Njoroge, N. N. (2012). The impact of front office Sacco activity on Sacco performance in Kenya; a case study of Meru south and Maara district in Tharaka Nithi County in Kenya. Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2(5), 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejia, D. (2003). MAIZE: Post-harvest operations. INPhO-Post-harvest Compendium. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). AGST. Rome, Italy.

  • Mlozi, M. R. S., Kakengi, A. V. M., Minga, U. M., Mtambo, A. M., & Olsen, J. E. (2003). Marketing of free-range local chickens in Morogoro and Kilosa urban markets, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnenwa, R., & Maliti, E. (2010). A comparative analysis of poverty incidence in farming systems of Tanzania. Special paper 10/4. Dar-es-Salaam: REPOA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., Tassone, V., Groot, R., Camilleri, M., & Moncada, S. (2011). A framework for participatory impact assessment: Involving stakeholders in European policy making, a case study of land use change in Malta. Ecology and Society, 16 (1).

  • Müller, C., Cramer, W., Hare, W. L., & Lotze-Campen, H. (2011). Climate change risks for African agriculture. PNAS, 108, 4313–4315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutabazi, K. D., Sieber, S., Maeda, C., & Tscherning, K. (2015). Assessing the determinants of poverty and vulnerability of smallholder farmers in a changing climate: the case of Morogoro region in Tanzania. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7), 1243–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwinuka, L., Mutabazi, K. D., Graef, F., Maeda, C., Makoko, B. & Swai, E. (2015a). Agri-food Value Chains Upgrading Strategies Choices: A Participatory Smallholder Farmer Centred Approach. Plant2030 Status Seminar, Berlin, Germany 4th–6th March 2015.

  • Mwinuka, L., Schneider, I., Maeda, C., Mutabazi, K. D., Makindara, J., Graef, F., Sieber, S., Swai, E., Mbwana, H., & Swamila, M. (2015b). Comparing stakeholder views for mutual acceptable food value chain upgrading strategies in Tanzania. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(12), 1376–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndah, H. T., Schuler, J., Uthes, S., Zander, P., Triomphe, B., Mkomwa, S., & Corbeels, M. (2015). Adoption potential for conservation agriculture in Africa: a newly developed assessment approach (QAToCA) applied in Kenya and Tanzania. Land Degradation & Development, 26, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedumaran, S., Beleke Shiferaw, M. C. S., Bantilan, K. P., & Suhas, P. W. (2014). Bioeconomic modeling of farm household decisions for ex-ante impact assessment of integrated watershed development programs in semi-arid India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16, 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, G. S. V., Rennie, T. J., Sunjka, P. S., Orsat, V., Phaphuangwittayakul, W., & Terdtoon, P. (2005). Overview of new techniques for drying biological materials with emphasis on energy aspects. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 22(2), 195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L., Bolwig, S., Matose, F., Ponte, S., du Toit, A., & Halberg, N. (2008). A strategic framework and toolbox for action research with small producers in value chains. Copenhagen: DIIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L., Bolwig, S., Ponte, S., du Toit, A., Halberg, N., & Matose, F. (2010). Integrating poverty and environmental concerns into value-chain analysis: a strategic framework and practical guide. Development Policy Review, 28, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RLDC, Rural Livelihood Development Company (2008). Sunflower Sector-Market Development Strategy. Dodoma, Tanzania.

  • Rohitha Prasantha, B. D., Hafeel, R. F., Wimalasiri, K. M. S., & Pathirana, U. P. D. (2014). End-use quality characteristics of hermetically stored paddy. Journal of Stored Products Research, 59, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S. K., Fuchs, G. J., Mahmud, Z., Ara, G., & Islam, S. (2005). Intensive nutrition education with or without supplementary feeding improves the nutritional status of moderately-malnourished children in Bangladesh. Journal of health. Population and Nutrition., 23(4), 320–330.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, P. A. (2002). Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science, 295, 2019–2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, J., Graef, F., & König, H. (2015). A critical examination of sustainability impact assessment methods of farming interventions in developing countries: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 1043–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, J., Graef, F., König, H., Mutabazi, K., Mchau, D., & Kaburire, L. (2016). Developing community based food security criteria in rural Tanzania. Food Security, published online.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I. (2014). Potential and feasibility for implementing upgrading strategies to improve rural poor food value chains - An ex-ante expert assessment for two Tanzanian focus regions - Masters Thesis. Humboldt University: Germany. p 158.

  • Shemdoe, R. S. (2011). Tracking effective indigenous adaptation strategies on impacts of climate variability on food security and health of subsistence farmers in Tanzania. ATPSNet. http://www.atpsnet.org/Files/wps51.pdf

  • Sieber, S., Jha, S., Shereef, A.-B. T., Bringe, F., Crewett, W., Uckert, G., Polreich, S., Ndah, T. H., Graef, F., & Mueller, K. (2015). Integrated assessment of sustainable agricultural practices to enhance climate resilience in Morogoro, Tanzania. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7), 1281–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uckert, G. et al. (2016). ScalA-FS: Expert-based ex-ante assessments of implementation requirements and on potential institutional impacts of upgrading strategies improving food security in rural Tanzania. Food Security, published online.

  • USAID (2008). Preliminary rural livelihood zoning: Tanzania. A special report by the famine early warning system network (FEWS NET). Dar es Salaam: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooyen, J., & Sigwele, H. (1998). Towards regional food security in southern Africa: a (new) policy framework for the agricultural sector. Food Policy, 23, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Braun, J. (2007). The world food situation. New driving forces and required actions. Washington: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M., Kahan, D., & Lehel, S. (2008). Market-oriented agricultural infrastructure: appraisal of public-private partnerships. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987). Our common future: report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFP (2013). Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis. Tanzania 2012. Rome: WFP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziervogel, G., & Ericksen, P. J. (2010). Adapting to climate change to sustain food security. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is a product of the Trans-SEC (www.trans-sec.org) project and Food Security Africa (FSA). The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funded the Trans-SEC project, with co-finance from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and may not under any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the BMBF and BMZ. The Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) financed the FSA project. Thanks to P. Ngwenya for revising the English of this article and to all Trans-SEC colleagues for their input into the assessment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frieder Graef.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graef, F., Uckert, G., Schindler, J. et al. Expert-based ex-ante assessments of potential social, ecological, and economic impacts of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania using the ScalA-FS approach. Food Sec. 9, 1255–1270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0639-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0639-x

Keywords

Navigation