Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A bio-economic ‘war game’ model to simulate plant disease incursions and test response strategies at the landscape scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss of area freedom from invasive alien species can have serious food security implications and place huge responsibility on incursion response managers. They make critical decisions despite profound uncertainty surrounding invasion ecology, surveillance and control technology effectiveness and human behaviour. We propose a spatially-explicit model that can aid response managers in devising and testing management strategies in a virtual world where the costs of failure are negligible. We apply the model in a group-based decision setting in which participants practise responding to fictional disease incursions in a pome fruit production area in Australia. Using the model, the response management group was able to develop mutually satisfactory rules of thumb for the use of quarantine and destruction zones and for when to withdraw resources from eradication efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS. (2014). Agricultural commodities, Australia, 2011–12. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B. (2002). Food security and food assistance programs. In B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics (Vol. 2, pp. 2103–2190). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, M. J. (2008). Review of software platforms for agent based models. Edinburgh: Defence Science and Technology Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, W., Rauschmayer, F., & Bräuer, I. (2005). Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman, M., Fidler, F., McBride, M., Walshe, T., & Wintle, B. (2006). Eliciting expert judgements: Literature review. Melbourne: Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, C. J. E., & Crooks, A. T. (2006). Principles and concepts of agent-based modelling for developing geospatial simulations. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Working Papers 110 (p. 60). London: University College London Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis.

  • Cook, D. C., Liu, S., Murphy, B., & Lonsdale, W. M. (2010). Adaptive approaches to biosecurity governance. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1303–1314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. C., Carrasco, L. R., Paini, D. R., & Fraser, R. W. (2011a). Estimating the social welfare effects of New Zealand apple imports. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. C., Fraser, R. W., Paini, D. R., Warden, A. C., Lonsdale, W. M., & Barro, P. J. D. (2011b). Biosecurity and yield improvement technologies are strategic complements in the fight against food insecurity. PLoS One, 6(10), e26084. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026084.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. C., Liu, S., Aurambout, J.-P., Villalta, O. N., Kriticos, D. J., Edwards, J., et al. (2012). Final report CRC10162 communicating uncertainties in biosecurity adaption (p. 266). Canberra: Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Primary Industries. (2008). Victorian land use information system (p. 2). Melbourne: Department of Primary Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne, E., Lange, M., Van der Stede, Y., Meroc, E., Durand, B., & Hendrickx, G. (2011). A stochastic predictive model for the natural spread of bluetongue. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 99(1), 48–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, B., & Boissy, A. (1999). Relations sociales et comportement alimentaire au pâturage. Productions Animales-Paris-Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique, 12, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliston, L., & Beare, S. (2006). Managing agricultural pest and disease incursions: An application of agent-based modelling. In P. Perez & D. F. Batten (Eds.), Complex science for a complex world: Exploring human ecosystems with agents (pp. 177–189). Canberra: ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, S. M., Harrison, G. W., Hughes, C. E., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Virtual experiments and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2009). The state of food insecurity in the world: Economic crises – impacts and lessons learned (p. 57). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GEOINT (2010). World Geodetic System 1984. http://web.archive.org/web/20120401083859/http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/index.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2014.

  • Horan, R. D., & Lupi, F. (2005). Tradeable risk permits to prevent future introductions of invasive alien species into the Great Lakes. Ecological Economics, 52, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). GIS-supported collaborative decision-making: results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(1), 48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennertz, B. (2011). High-touch/high-tech charrettes. Planning, 77(8), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Aurambout, J.-P., Villalta, O., Edwards, J., De Barro, P., Kriticos, D. J., et al. (2015). A structured war-gaming framework for managing extreme risks. Ecological Economics, 116(0), 369–377. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. (1996). Food security: a post-modern perspective. Food Policy, 21(2), 155–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne, B. A., & Hastings, A. (2009). Highly variable spread rates in replicated biological invasions: fundamental limits to predictability. Science, 325, 1536–1539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, P. (Ed.). (2002). Revised contingency plan for fire blight. Sydney: Horticulture Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerke, E. C. (2006). Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oerke, E. C., & Dehne, H. W. (2004). Safeguarding production - losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection, 23, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghu, S., Dhileepan, K., & Scanlan, J. C. (2007). Predicting risk and benefit a priori in biological control of invasive plant species: a systems modelling approach. Ecological Modelling, 208(2), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F., Lytinen, S. L., & Jackson, S. K. (2006). Agent-based simulation platforms: review and development recommendations. Simulation, 82(9), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbands, C. R. (1951). The flight range of the honey-bee. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 20(2), 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowski, M. R., Fletcher, J. D., Daly, A. M., Rodoni, B. C., & Viljanen-Rollinson, S. L. H. (2009). Techniques for the treatment, removal and disposal of host material during programmes for plant pathogen eradication. Plant Pathology, 58(4), 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel, A. (2008). High food prices: Causes, implications and solutions (p. 24). Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior construal level theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trostle, R. (2008). Global agricultural supply and demand: Factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices (p. 30). Washington: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Xiong, J., Yang, K., Peng, S., & Xu, Q. (2010). Use of GIS and agent-based modeling to simulate the spread of influenza. In 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Geoinformatics 2010.

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was presented at a conference sponsored by the OECD’s Co-operative Research Programme on Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems whose financial support made it possible for most of the invited speakers to participate. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its Member countries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Cook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cook, D.C., Aurambout, JP., Villalta, O.N. et al. A bio-economic ‘war game’ model to simulate plant disease incursions and test response strategies at the landscape scale. Food Sec. 8, 37–48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0524-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0524-z

Keywords

Navigation