Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gifted students’ attitudes towards mathematics: a qualitative multidimensional analysis

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine intellectually gifted students’ attitude towards mathematics. Affective domain has been considered as one of the pillar of giftedness although a limited number of studies have been carried out related to this issue and gifted students’ attitude towards mathematics has rarely been investigated. The three-dimensional model of attitude towards mathematics (emotional dimension, perceived competence and vision of mathematics) developed by Zan and Di Martino (Montana Math Enthusiast 3:157–168, 2007) was used in order to better understand the factors affecting the construction of students’ positive and negative attitudes. A total of 36 fifth grade (12 years old) students in a centre for gifted students participated in the study. The data were gathered through students’ metaphors about mathematics, students’ narratives about their mathematical experiences and interviews with each student. The data were analysed using the content analysis method. The findings showed that the majority of the students had a positive attitude towards mathematics and that this attitude was quite stable and developed at an early age, although one-third of the students had negative or unstable attitude towards mathematics. The findings also indicated that there was a strong interaction between the three dimensions of attitude, and the vision of mathematics often underlies students’ positive and negative emotions towards mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from Zan and Di Martino (2007) and Di Martino and Zan (2010)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adediwura, A. A. (2011). The development and confirmatory factor analysis of a scale for the measurement of gifted students’ attitude towards mathematics. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. A. (1973). Ability and creativity in mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 43(3), 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arıkan, E. E., & Ünal, H. (2015). Gifted students’ metaphor images about mathematics. Educational Research Reviews, 10, 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance and teaching (2nd edn.). Waco: Prufrock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2015). The construct of attitude in mathematics education. In B. Peppin & B. Roeskin-Winter (eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 51–72). Retrieved from 11 October 2017 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_3.

  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of gifted and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61–80). Waco: Prufrock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. R. (2008). An exploration of intellectually gifted students’ conceptual views of mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, ABD.

  • Goldin, G. A., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). No longer a hidden variable in mathematics teaching and learning processes. In J. Maaß, W. Schlöglmann (eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results pp 1–18. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, M., Homer, M., & Swinnerton, B. (2008). A comparison of performance and attitudes in mathematics amongst the ‘gifted’. Are boys better at mathematics or do they just think they are? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, A. (2005). Differences in problem solving strategies of mathematically gifted and non-gifted elementary students. International Education Journal, 6(2), 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrina-Trehan, T. L. (2011). Mathematically gifted students’ attitudes toward writing in the math classroom: A case study. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, ABD.

  • Koshy, V., Ernest, P., & Casey, R. (2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. S. (1999). Using metaphor analysis to explore adults’ images of mathematics. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal. Retrieved 11 October from http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome12/article9.htm.

  • Lim, C. S., & Ernest, P. (1999). Public images of mathematics. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 11, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maaß, J., & Schlöglmann, W. (2009). Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M. (2002). Math attitudes of gifted students: A focus on gifted girls in the elementary grades. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, ABD.

  • McLeod, D. B. (1987). A constructivist approach to research on attitude toward mathematics. Proceedings of the 11th PME, Montreal, Vol. 1, pp. 133–140.

  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and Learning. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 634–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education, (2009). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi. Retrieved 16 May from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2593_0.html.

  • Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Retrieved 11 October 2017 from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html.

  • Renzulli, J. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (2013). Gifted behaviors versus gifted individuals. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 36–48). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sak, U., Ayas, M. B., Sezerel, B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N. N., & Demirel Gürbüz, Ş. (2015). Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5(2), 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savaşır, I., & Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler Çocuklar için Zekâ Ölçeği (WISC-R). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinck, A. G., Neale, H. W., Pugalee, D. K., & Cifarelli, V. V. (2008). Using metaphors to unpack student beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 326–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004). Gifted ninth graders’ notions of proof: Investigating parallels in approaches of mathematically gifted students and professional mathematicians. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(4), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M. (1996). The attitudes toward mathematics instrument. The Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Tuscaloosa.

  • Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan, S., & Kılıç, Ş (2014). Identification of gifted and talented student and models in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(2), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarım, K., & Dinç Artut, P. (2016). Tutum ve matematik başarısı. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan & İÖ Zembat (eds.), Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (Eds.) (pp. 767–784). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toluk Uçar, Z., Pişkin, M., Akkaş, E. N., & Taşçı, D. (2010). Elementary students’ beliefs about mathematics, mathematics teachers and mathematicians. Education and Science, 35, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trisha, M. (1999). Changing student attitudes towards mathematics. Primary Educator, 5(4), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, J., Song, S., & Kim, J. (2008). The mathematically gifted elementary students’ revisiting of Euler’s polyhedron theorem. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(1), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Special Issue, 63(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3, 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey

    Abdulkadir Erdogan

  2. Institute of Educational Sciences, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey

    Esra Yemenli

Authors
  1. Abdulkadir Erdogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esra Yemenli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulkadir Erdogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdogan, A., Yemenli, E. Gifted students’ attitudes towards mathematics: a qualitative multidimensional analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 37–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9562-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9562-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation